Cargando…

PET Radiopharmaceuticals for Specific Bacteria Imaging: A Systematic Review

Background: Bacterial infections are still one of the main factors associated with mortality worldwide. Many radiopharmaceuticals were developed for bacterial imaging, both with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) isotopes. This review focuses on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Auletta, Sveva, Varani, Michela, Horvat, Rika, Galli, Filippo, Signore, Alberto, Hess, Søren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30736324
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020197
_version_ 1783401280613384192
author Auletta, Sveva
Varani, Michela
Horvat, Rika
Galli, Filippo
Signore, Alberto
Hess, Søren
author_facet Auletta, Sveva
Varani, Michela
Horvat, Rika
Galli, Filippo
Signore, Alberto
Hess, Søren
author_sort Auletta, Sveva
collection PubMed
description Background: Bacterial infections are still one of the main factors associated with mortality worldwide. Many radiopharmaceuticals were developed for bacterial imaging, both with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) isotopes. This review focuses on PET radiopharmaceuticals, performing a systematic literature review of published studies between 2005 and 2018. Methods: A systematic review of published studies between 2005 and 2018 was performed. A team of reviewers independently screened for eligible studies. Because of differences between studies, we pooled the data where possible, otherwise, we described separately. Quality of evidence was assessed by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) approach. Results: Eligible papers included 35 published studies. Because of the heterogeneity of animal models and bacterial strains, we classified studies in relation to the type of bacterium: Gram-positive, Gram-negative, Gram-positive and negative, others. Conclusions: Results highlighted the availability of many promising PET radiopharmaceuticals for bacterial imaging, despite some bias related to animal selection and index test, but few have been translated to human subjects. Results showed a lack of standardized infection models and experimental settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6406348
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64063482019-03-22 PET Radiopharmaceuticals for Specific Bacteria Imaging: A Systematic Review Auletta, Sveva Varani, Michela Horvat, Rika Galli, Filippo Signore, Alberto Hess, Søren J Clin Med Review Background: Bacterial infections are still one of the main factors associated with mortality worldwide. Many radiopharmaceuticals were developed for bacterial imaging, both with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) isotopes. This review focuses on PET radiopharmaceuticals, performing a systematic literature review of published studies between 2005 and 2018. Methods: A systematic review of published studies between 2005 and 2018 was performed. A team of reviewers independently screened for eligible studies. Because of differences between studies, we pooled the data where possible, otherwise, we described separately. Quality of evidence was assessed by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) approach. Results: Eligible papers included 35 published studies. Because of the heterogeneity of animal models and bacterial strains, we classified studies in relation to the type of bacterium: Gram-positive, Gram-negative, Gram-positive and negative, others. Conclusions: Results highlighted the availability of many promising PET radiopharmaceuticals for bacterial imaging, despite some bias related to animal selection and index test, but few have been translated to human subjects. Results showed a lack of standardized infection models and experimental settings. MDPI 2019-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6406348/ /pubmed/30736324 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020197 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Auletta, Sveva
Varani, Michela
Horvat, Rika
Galli, Filippo
Signore, Alberto
Hess, Søren
PET Radiopharmaceuticals for Specific Bacteria Imaging: A Systematic Review
title PET Radiopharmaceuticals for Specific Bacteria Imaging: A Systematic Review
title_full PET Radiopharmaceuticals for Specific Bacteria Imaging: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr PET Radiopharmaceuticals for Specific Bacteria Imaging: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed PET Radiopharmaceuticals for Specific Bacteria Imaging: A Systematic Review
title_short PET Radiopharmaceuticals for Specific Bacteria Imaging: A Systematic Review
title_sort pet radiopharmaceuticals for specific bacteria imaging: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30736324
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020197
work_keys_str_mv AT aulettasveva petradiopharmaceuticalsforspecificbacteriaimagingasystematicreview
AT varanimichela petradiopharmaceuticalsforspecificbacteriaimagingasystematicreview
AT horvatrika petradiopharmaceuticalsforspecificbacteriaimagingasystematicreview
AT gallifilippo petradiopharmaceuticalsforspecificbacteriaimagingasystematicreview
AT signorealberto petradiopharmaceuticalsforspecificbacteriaimagingasystematicreview
AT hesssøren petradiopharmaceuticalsforspecificbacteriaimagingasystematicreview