Cargando…
PET Radiopharmaceuticals for Specific Bacteria Imaging: A Systematic Review
Background: Bacterial infections are still one of the main factors associated with mortality worldwide. Many radiopharmaceuticals were developed for bacterial imaging, both with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) isotopes. This review focuses on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30736324 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020197 |
_version_ | 1783401280613384192 |
---|---|
author | Auletta, Sveva Varani, Michela Horvat, Rika Galli, Filippo Signore, Alberto Hess, Søren |
author_facet | Auletta, Sveva Varani, Michela Horvat, Rika Galli, Filippo Signore, Alberto Hess, Søren |
author_sort | Auletta, Sveva |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Bacterial infections are still one of the main factors associated with mortality worldwide. Many radiopharmaceuticals were developed for bacterial imaging, both with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) isotopes. This review focuses on PET radiopharmaceuticals, performing a systematic literature review of published studies between 2005 and 2018. Methods: A systematic review of published studies between 2005 and 2018 was performed. A team of reviewers independently screened for eligible studies. Because of differences between studies, we pooled the data where possible, otherwise, we described separately. Quality of evidence was assessed by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) approach. Results: Eligible papers included 35 published studies. Because of the heterogeneity of animal models and bacterial strains, we classified studies in relation to the type of bacterium: Gram-positive, Gram-negative, Gram-positive and negative, others. Conclusions: Results highlighted the availability of many promising PET radiopharmaceuticals for bacterial imaging, despite some bias related to animal selection and index test, but few have been translated to human subjects. Results showed a lack of standardized infection models and experimental settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6406348 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64063482019-03-22 PET Radiopharmaceuticals for Specific Bacteria Imaging: A Systematic Review Auletta, Sveva Varani, Michela Horvat, Rika Galli, Filippo Signore, Alberto Hess, Søren J Clin Med Review Background: Bacterial infections are still one of the main factors associated with mortality worldwide. Many radiopharmaceuticals were developed for bacterial imaging, both with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) isotopes. This review focuses on PET radiopharmaceuticals, performing a systematic literature review of published studies between 2005 and 2018. Methods: A systematic review of published studies between 2005 and 2018 was performed. A team of reviewers independently screened for eligible studies. Because of differences between studies, we pooled the data where possible, otherwise, we described separately. Quality of evidence was assessed by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) approach. Results: Eligible papers included 35 published studies. Because of the heterogeneity of animal models and bacterial strains, we classified studies in relation to the type of bacterium: Gram-positive, Gram-negative, Gram-positive and negative, others. Conclusions: Results highlighted the availability of many promising PET radiopharmaceuticals for bacterial imaging, despite some bias related to animal selection and index test, but few have been translated to human subjects. Results showed a lack of standardized infection models and experimental settings. MDPI 2019-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6406348/ /pubmed/30736324 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020197 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Auletta, Sveva Varani, Michela Horvat, Rika Galli, Filippo Signore, Alberto Hess, Søren PET Radiopharmaceuticals for Specific Bacteria Imaging: A Systematic Review |
title | PET Radiopharmaceuticals for Specific Bacteria Imaging: A Systematic Review |
title_full | PET Radiopharmaceuticals for Specific Bacteria Imaging: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | PET Radiopharmaceuticals for Specific Bacteria Imaging: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | PET Radiopharmaceuticals for Specific Bacteria Imaging: A Systematic Review |
title_short | PET Radiopharmaceuticals for Specific Bacteria Imaging: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | pet radiopharmaceuticals for specific bacteria imaging: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30736324 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020197 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aulettasveva petradiopharmaceuticalsforspecificbacteriaimagingasystematicreview AT varanimichela petradiopharmaceuticalsforspecificbacteriaimagingasystematicreview AT horvatrika petradiopharmaceuticalsforspecificbacteriaimagingasystematicreview AT gallifilippo petradiopharmaceuticalsforspecificbacteriaimagingasystematicreview AT signorealberto petradiopharmaceuticalsforspecificbacteriaimagingasystematicreview AT hesssøren petradiopharmaceuticalsforspecificbacteriaimagingasystematicreview |