Cargando…

The Ethics of Human–Animal Relationships and Public Discourse: A Case Study of Lions Bred for Their Bones

SIMPLE SUMMARY: In South Africa, lions are farmed, and a product of that farming is lion skeletons that form part of an international trade to supply traditional medicine markets in Southeast Asia with felid bones. As a matter of public policy, the practice is a complicated nexus of concerns for ent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coals, Peter, Burnham, Dawn, Loveridge, Andrew, Macdonald, David W., ’t Sas-Rolfes, Michael, Williams, Vivienne L., Vucetich, John A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30744079
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9020052
_version_ 1783401325281673216
author Coals, Peter
Burnham, Dawn
Loveridge, Andrew
Macdonald, David W.
’t Sas-Rolfes, Michael
Williams, Vivienne L.
Vucetich, John A.
author_facet Coals, Peter
Burnham, Dawn
Loveridge, Andrew
Macdonald, David W.
’t Sas-Rolfes, Michael
Williams, Vivienne L.
Vucetich, John A.
author_sort Coals, Peter
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: In South Africa, lions are farmed, and a product of that farming is lion skeletons that form part of an international trade to supply traditional medicine markets in Southeast Asia with felid bones. As a matter of public policy, the practice is a complicated nexus of concerns for entrepreneurial freedom, wildlife conservation, and the fair treatment of animals. We used this case to demonstrate how public discourse about ethically-charged policies can be aided by a technique from the academic field of applied ethics, i.e., formal argument analysis. We showed how the technique can be integrated into existing frameworks for public decision-making. To further facilitate the application of this technique to other cases, we also offered ten general lessons for formal analysis of ethical arguments. ABSTRACT: Conservation and natural resource management are increasingly attending the ethical elements of public decisions. Ethical considerations are challenging, in part, because they typically require accounting for the moral consideration of various human and nonhuman forms of life, whose interests sometimes conflict (or seem to conflict). A valuable tool for such evaluations is the formal analysis of ethical arguments. An ethical argument is a collection of premises, logically interrelated, to yield a conclusion that can be expressed in the form, “We ought to…” According to the rules of logic, a conclusion is supported by an argument if all its premises are true or appropriate and when it contains no mistaken inferences. We showed how the formal analysis of ethical arguments can be used to engage stakeholders and decision-makers in decision-making processes. We summarised the method with ten specific guidelines that would be applicable to any case. We illustrated the technique using a case study focused on captive-bred lions, the skeletons of which form part of an international trade to supply traditional medicine markets in Southeast Asia with felid bones. As a matter of public policy, the practice is a complicated nexus of concerns for entrepreneurial freedom, wildlife conservation, and the fair treatment of animals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6406519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64065192019-03-08 The Ethics of Human–Animal Relationships and Public Discourse: A Case Study of Lions Bred for Their Bones Coals, Peter Burnham, Dawn Loveridge, Andrew Macdonald, David W. ’t Sas-Rolfes, Michael Williams, Vivienne L. Vucetich, John A. Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: In South Africa, lions are farmed, and a product of that farming is lion skeletons that form part of an international trade to supply traditional medicine markets in Southeast Asia with felid bones. As a matter of public policy, the practice is a complicated nexus of concerns for entrepreneurial freedom, wildlife conservation, and the fair treatment of animals. We used this case to demonstrate how public discourse about ethically-charged policies can be aided by a technique from the academic field of applied ethics, i.e., formal argument analysis. We showed how the technique can be integrated into existing frameworks for public decision-making. To further facilitate the application of this technique to other cases, we also offered ten general lessons for formal analysis of ethical arguments. ABSTRACT: Conservation and natural resource management are increasingly attending the ethical elements of public decisions. Ethical considerations are challenging, in part, because they typically require accounting for the moral consideration of various human and nonhuman forms of life, whose interests sometimes conflict (or seem to conflict). A valuable tool for such evaluations is the formal analysis of ethical arguments. An ethical argument is a collection of premises, logically interrelated, to yield a conclusion that can be expressed in the form, “We ought to…” According to the rules of logic, a conclusion is supported by an argument if all its premises are true or appropriate and when it contains no mistaken inferences. We showed how the formal analysis of ethical arguments can be used to engage stakeholders and decision-makers in decision-making processes. We summarised the method with ten specific guidelines that would be applicable to any case. We illustrated the technique using a case study focused on captive-bred lions, the skeletons of which form part of an international trade to supply traditional medicine markets in Southeast Asia with felid bones. As a matter of public policy, the practice is a complicated nexus of concerns for entrepreneurial freedom, wildlife conservation, and the fair treatment of animals. MDPI 2019-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6406519/ /pubmed/30744079 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9020052 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Coals, Peter
Burnham, Dawn
Loveridge, Andrew
Macdonald, David W.
’t Sas-Rolfes, Michael
Williams, Vivienne L.
Vucetich, John A.
The Ethics of Human–Animal Relationships and Public Discourse: A Case Study of Lions Bred for Their Bones
title The Ethics of Human–Animal Relationships and Public Discourse: A Case Study of Lions Bred for Their Bones
title_full The Ethics of Human–Animal Relationships and Public Discourse: A Case Study of Lions Bred for Their Bones
title_fullStr The Ethics of Human–Animal Relationships and Public Discourse: A Case Study of Lions Bred for Their Bones
title_full_unstemmed The Ethics of Human–Animal Relationships and Public Discourse: A Case Study of Lions Bred for Their Bones
title_short The Ethics of Human–Animal Relationships and Public Discourse: A Case Study of Lions Bred for Their Bones
title_sort ethics of human–animal relationships and public discourse: a case study of lions bred for their bones
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30744079
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9020052
work_keys_str_mv AT coalspeter theethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones
AT burnhamdawn theethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones
AT loveridgeandrew theethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones
AT macdonalddavidw theethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones
AT tsasrolfesmichael theethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones
AT williamsviviennel theethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones
AT vucetichjohna theethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones
AT coalspeter ethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones
AT burnhamdawn ethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones
AT loveridgeandrew ethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones
AT macdonalddavidw ethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones
AT tsasrolfesmichael ethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones
AT williamsviviennel ethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones
AT vucetichjohna ethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones