Cargando…
The Ethics of Human–Animal Relationships and Public Discourse: A Case Study of Lions Bred for Their Bones
SIMPLE SUMMARY: In South Africa, lions are farmed, and a product of that farming is lion skeletons that form part of an international trade to supply traditional medicine markets in Southeast Asia with felid bones. As a matter of public policy, the practice is a complicated nexus of concerns for ent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30744079 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9020052 |
_version_ | 1783401325281673216 |
---|---|
author | Coals, Peter Burnham, Dawn Loveridge, Andrew Macdonald, David W. ’t Sas-Rolfes, Michael Williams, Vivienne L. Vucetich, John A. |
author_facet | Coals, Peter Burnham, Dawn Loveridge, Andrew Macdonald, David W. ’t Sas-Rolfes, Michael Williams, Vivienne L. Vucetich, John A. |
author_sort | Coals, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: In South Africa, lions are farmed, and a product of that farming is lion skeletons that form part of an international trade to supply traditional medicine markets in Southeast Asia with felid bones. As a matter of public policy, the practice is a complicated nexus of concerns for entrepreneurial freedom, wildlife conservation, and the fair treatment of animals. We used this case to demonstrate how public discourse about ethically-charged policies can be aided by a technique from the academic field of applied ethics, i.e., formal argument analysis. We showed how the technique can be integrated into existing frameworks for public decision-making. To further facilitate the application of this technique to other cases, we also offered ten general lessons for formal analysis of ethical arguments. ABSTRACT: Conservation and natural resource management are increasingly attending the ethical elements of public decisions. Ethical considerations are challenging, in part, because they typically require accounting for the moral consideration of various human and nonhuman forms of life, whose interests sometimes conflict (or seem to conflict). A valuable tool for such evaluations is the formal analysis of ethical arguments. An ethical argument is a collection of premises, logically interrelated, to yield a conclusion that can be expressed in the form, “We ought to…” According to the rules of logic, a conclusion is supported by an argument if all its premises are true or appropriate and when it contains no mistaken inferences. We showed how the formal analysis of ethical arguments can be used to engage stakeholders and decision-makers in decision-making processes. We summarised the method with ten specific guidelines that would be applicable to any case. We illustrated the technique using a case study focused on captive-bred lions, the skeletons of which form part of an international trade to supply traditional medicine markets in Southeast Asia with felid bones. As a matter of public policy, the practice is a complicated nexus of concerns for entrepreneurial freedom, wildlife conservation, and the fair treatment of animals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6406519 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64065192019-03-08 The Ethics of Human–Animal Relationships and Public Discourse: A Case Study of Lions Bred for Their Bones Coals, Peter Burnham, Dawn Loveridge, Andrew Macdonald, David W. ’t Sas-Rolfes, Michael Williams, Vivienne L. Vucetich, John A. Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: In South Africa, lions are farmed, and a product of that farming is lion skeletons that form part of an international trade to supply traditional medicine markets in Southeast Asia with felid bones. As a matter of public policy, the practice is a complicated nexus of concerns for entrepreneurial freedom, wildlife conservation, and the fair treatment of animals. We used this case to demonstrate how public discourse about ethically-charged policies can be aided by a technique from the academic field of applied ethics, i.e., formal argument analysis. We showed how the technique can be integrated into existing frameworks for public decision-making. To further facilitate the application of this technique to other cases, we also offered ten general lessons for formal analysis of ethical arguments. ABSTRACT: Conservation and natural resource management are increasingly attending the ethical elements of public decisions. Ethical considerations are challenging, in part, because they typically require accounting for the moral consideration of various human and nonhuman forms of life, whose interests sometimes conflict (or seem to conflict). A valuable tool for such evaluations is the formal analysis of ethical arguments. An ethical argument is a collection of premises, logically interrelated, to yield a conclusion that can be expressed in the form, “We ought to…” According to the rules of logic, a conclusion is supported by an argument if all its premises are true or appropriate and when it contains no mistaken inferences. We showed how the formal analysis of ethical arguments can be used to engage stakeholders and decision-makers in decision-making processes. We summarised the method with ten specific guidelines that would be applicable to any case. We illustrated the technique using a case study focused on captive-bred lions, the skeletons of which form part of an international trade to supply traditional medicine markets in Southeast Asia with felid bones. As a matter of public policy, the practice is a complicated nexus of concerns for entrepreneurial freedom, wildlife conservation, and the fair treatment of animals. MDPI 2019-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6406519/ /pubmed/30744079 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9020052 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Coals, Peter Burnham, Dawn Loveridge, Andrew Macdonald, David W. ’t Sas-Rolfes, Michael Williams, Vivienne L. Vucetich, John A. The Ethics of Human–Animal Relationships and Public Discourse: A Case Study of Lions Bred for Their Bones |
title | The Ethics of Human–Animal Relationships and Public Discourse: A Case Study of Lions Bred for Their Bones |
title_full | The Ethics of Human–Animal Relationships and Public Discourse: A Case Study of Lions Bred for Their Bones |
title_fullStr | The Ethics of Human–Animal Relationships and Public Discourse: A Case Study of Lions Bred for Their Bones |
title_full_unstemmed | The Ethics of Human–Animal Relationships and Public Discourse: A Case Study of Lions Bred for Their Bones |
title_short | The Ethics of Human–Animal Relationships and Public Discourse: A Case Study of Lions Bred for Their Bones |
title_sort | ethics of human–animal relationships and public discourse: a case study of lions bred for their bones |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30744079 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9020052 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coalspeter theethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones AT burnhamdawn theethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones AT loveridgeandrew theethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones AT macdonalddavidw theethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones AT tsasrolfesmichael theethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones AT williamsviviennel theethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones AT vucetichjohna theethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones AT coalspeter ethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones AT burnhamdawn ethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones AT loveridgeandrew ethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones AT macdonalddavidw ethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones AT tsasrolfesmichael ethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones AT williamsviviennel ethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones AT vucetichjohna ethicsofhumananimalrelationshipsandpublicdiscourseacasestudyoflionsbredfortheirbones |