Cargando…

A Peri-Implant Disease Risk Score for Patients with Dental Implants: Validation and the Influence of the Interval between Maintenance Appointments

Background: There is a need for tools that provide prediction of peri-implant disease. The purpose of this study was to validate a risk score for peri-implant disease and to assess the influence of the recall regimen in disease incidence based on a five-year retrospective cohort. Methods: Three hund...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Araújo Nobre, Miguel, Salvado, Francisco, Nogueira, Paulo, Rocha, Evangelista, Ilg, Peter, Maló, Paulo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30781553
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020252
_version_ 1783401339088273408
author de Araújo Nobre, Miguel
Salvado, Francisco
Nogueira, Paulo
Rocha, Evangelista
Ilg, Peter
Maló, Paulo
author_facet de Araújo Nobre, Miguel
Salvado, Francisco
Nogueira, Paulo
Rocha, Evangelista
Ilg, Peter
Maló, Paulo
author_sort de Araújo Nobre, Miguel
collection PubMed
description Background: There is a need for tools that provide prediction of peri-implant disease. The purpose of this study was to validate a risk score for peri-implant disease and to assess the influence of the recall regimen in disease incidence based on a five-year retrospective cohort. Methods: Three hundred and fifty-three patients with 1238 implants were observed. A risk score was calculated from eight predictors and risk groups were established. Relative risk (RR) was estimated using logistic regression, and the c-statistic was calculated. The effect/impact of the recall regimen (≤ six months; > six months) on the incidence of peri-implant disease was evaluated for a subset of cases and matched controls. The RR and the proportional attributable risk (PAR) were estimated. Results: At baseline, patients fell into the following risk profiles: low-risk (n = 102, 28.9%), moderate-risk (n = 68, 19.3%), high-risk (n = 77, 21.8%), and very high-risk (n = 106, 30%). The incidence of peri-implant disease over five years was 24.1% (n = 85 patients). The RR for the risk groups was 5.52 (c-statistic = 0.858). The RR for a longer recall regimen was 1.06, corresponding to a PAR of 5.87%. Conclusions: The risk score for estimating peri-implant disease was validated and showed very good performance. Maintenance appointments of < six months or > six months did not influence the incidence of peri-implant disease when considering the matching of cases and controls by risk profile.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6406564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64065642019-03-22 A Peri-Implant Disease Risk Score for Patients with Dental Implants: Validation and the Influence of the Interval between Maintenance Appointments de Araújo Nobre, Miguel Salvado, Francisco Nogueira, Paulo Rocha, Evangelista Ilg, Peter Maló, Paulo J Clin Med Article Background: There is a need for tools that provide prediction of peri-implant disease. The purpose of this study was to validate a risk score for peri-implant disease and to assess the influence of the recall regimen in disease incidence based on a five-year retrospective cohort. Methods: Three hundred and fifty-three patients with 1238 implants were observed. A risk score was calculated from eight predictors and risk groups were established. Relative risk (RR) was estimated using logistic regression, and the c-statistic was calculated. The effect/impact of the recall regimen (≤ six months; > six months) on the incidence of peri-implant disease was evaluated for a subset of cases and matched controls. The RR and the proportional attributable risk (PAR) were estimated. Results: At baseline, patients fell into the following risk profiles: low-risk (n = 102, 28.9%), moderate-risk (n = 68, 19.3%), high-risk (n = 77, 21.8%), and very high-risk (n = 106, 30%). The incidence of peri-implant disease over five years was 24.1% (n = 85 patients). The RR for the risk groups was 5.52 (c-statistic = 0.858). The RR for a longer recall regimen was 1.06, corresponding to a PAR of 5.87%. Conclusions: The risk score for estimating peri-implant disease was validated and showed very good performance. Maintenance appointments of < six months or > six months did not influence the incidence of peri-implant disease when considering the matching of cases and controls by risk profile. MDPI 2019-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6406564/ /pubmed/30781553 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020252 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
de Araújo Nobre, Miguel
Salvado, Francisco
Nogueira, Paulo
Rocha, Evangelista
Ilg, Peter
Maló, Paulo
A Peri-Implant Disease Risk Score for Patients with Dental Implants: Validation and the Influence of the Interval between Maintenance Appointments
title A Peri-Implant Disease Risk Score for Patients with Dental Implants: Validation and the Influence of the Interval between Maintenance Appointments
title_full A Peri-Implant Disease Risk Score for Patients with Dental Implants: Validation and the Influence of the Interval between Maintenance Appointments
title_fullStr A Peri-Implant Disease Risk Score for Patients with Dental Implants: Validation and the Influence of the Interval between Maintenance Appointments
title_full_unstemmed A Peri-Implant Disease Risk Score for Patients with Dental Implants: Validation and the Influence of the Interval between Maintenance Appointments
title_short A Peri-Implant Disease Risk Score for Patients with Dental Implants: Validation and the Influence of the Interval between Maintenance Appointments
title_sort peri-implant disease risk score for patients with dental implants: validation and the influence of the interval between maintenance appointments
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30781553
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020252
work_keys_str_mv AT dearaujonobremiguel aperiimplantdiseaseriskscoreforpatientswithdentalimplantsvalidationandtheinfluenceoftheintervalbetweenmaintenanceappointments
AT salvadofrancisco aperiimplantdiseaseriskscoreforpatientswithdentalimplantsvalidationandtheinfluenceoftheintervalbetweenmaintenanceappointments
AT nogueirapaulo aperiimplantdiseaseriskscoreforpatientswithdentalimplantsvalidationandtheinfluenceoftheintervalbetweenmaintenanceappointments
AT rochaevangelista aperiimplantdiseaseriskscoreforpatientswithdentalimplantsvalidationandtheinfluenceoftheintervalbetweenmaintenanceappointments
AT ilgpeter aperiimplantdiseaseriskscoreforpatientswithdentalimplantsvalidationandtheinfluenceoftheintervalbetweenmaintenanceappointments
AT malopaulo aperiimplantdiseaseriskscoreforpatientswithdentalimplantsvalidationandtheinfluenceoftheintervalbetweenmaintenanceappointments
AT dearaujonobremiguel periimplantdiseaseriskscoreforpatientswithdentalimplantsvalidationandtheinfluenceoftheintervalbetweenmaintenanceappointments
AT salvadofrancisco periimplantdiseaseriskscoreforpatientswithdentalimplantsvalidationandtheinfluenceoftheintervalbetweenmaintenanceappointments
AT nogueirapaulo periimplantdiseaseriskscoreforpatientswithdentalimplantsvalidationandtheinfluenceoftheintervalbetweenmaintenanceappointments
AT rochaevangelista periimplantdiseaseriskscoreforpatientswithdentalimplantsvalidationandtheinfluenceoftheintervalbetweenmaintenanceappointments
AT ilgpeter periimplantdiseaseriskscoreforpatientswithdentalimplantsvalidationandtheinfluenceoftheintervalbetweenmaintenanceappointments
AT malopaulo periimplantdiseaseriskscoreforpatientswithdentalimplantsvalidationandtheinfluenceoftheintervalbetweenmaintenanceappointments