Cargando…
A Peri-Implant Disease Risk Score for Patients with Dental Implants: Validation and the Influence of the Interval between Maintenance Appointments
Background: There is a need for tools that provide prediction of peri-implant disease. The purpose of this study was to validate a risk score for peri-implant disease and to assess the influence of the recall regimen in disease incidence based on a five-year retrospective cohort. Methods: Three hund...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30781553 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020252 |
_version_ | 1783401339088273408 |
---|---|
author | de Araújo Nobre, Miguel Salvado, Francisco Nogueira, Paulo Rocha, Evangelista Ilg, Peter Maló, Paulo |
author_facet | de Araújo Nobre, Miguel Salvado, Francisco Nogueira, Paulo Rocha, Evangelista Ilg, Peter Maló, Paulo |
author_sort | de Araújo Nobre, Miguel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: There is a need for tools that provide prediction of peri-implant disease. The purpose of this study was to validate a risk score for peri-implant disease and to assess the influence of the recall regimen in disease incidence based on a five-year retrospective cohort. Methods: Three hundred and fifty-three patients with 1238 implants were observed. A risk score was calculated from eight predictors and risk groups were established. Relative risk (RR) was estimated using logistic regression, and the c-statistic was calculated. The effect/impact of the recall regimen (≤ six months; > six months) on the incidence of peri-implant disease was evaluated for a subset of cases and matched controls. The RR and the proportional attributable risk (PAR) were estimated. Results: At baseline, patients fell into the following risk profiles: low-risk (n = 102, 28.9%), moderate-risk (n = 68, 19.3%), high-risk (n = 77, 21.8%), and very high-risk (n = 106, 30%). The incidence of peri-implant disease over five years was 24.1% (n = 85 patients). The RR for the risk groups was 5.52 (c-statistic = 0.858). The RR for a longer recall regimen was 1.06, corresponding to a PAR of 5.87%. Conclusions: The risk score for estimating peri-implant disease was validated and showed very good performance. Maintenance appointments of < six months or > six months did not influence the incidence of peri-implant disease when considering the matching of cases and controls by risk profile. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6406564 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64065642019-03-22 A Peri-Implant Disease Risk Score for Patients with Dental Implants: Validation and the Influence of the Interval between Maintenance Appointments de Araújo Nobre, Miguel Salvado, Francisco Nogueira, Paulo Rocha, Evangelista Ilg, Peter Maló, Paulo J Clin Med Article Background: There is a need for tools that provide prediction of peri-implant disease. The purpose of this study was to validate a risk score for peri-implant disease and to assess the influence of the recall regimen in disease incidence based on a five-year retrospective cohort. Methods: Three hundred and fifty-three patients with 1238 implants were observed. A risk score was calculated from eight predictors and risk groups were established. Relative risk (RR) was estimated using logistic regression, and the c-statistic was calculated. The effect/impact of the recall regimen (≤ six months; > six months) on the incidence of peri-implant disease was evaluated for a subset of cases and matched controls. The RR and the proportional attributable risk (PAR) were estimated. Results: At baseline, patients fell into the following risk profiles: low-risk (n = 102, 28.9%), moderate-risk (n = 68, 19.3%), high-risk (n = 77, 21.8%), and very high-risk (n = 106, 30%). The incidence of peri-implant disease over five years was 24.1% (n = 85 patients). The RR for the risk groups was 5.52 (c-statistic = 0.858). The RR for a longer recall regimen was 1.06, corresponding to a PAR of 5.87%. Conclusions: The risk score for estimating peri-implant disease was validated and showed very good performance. Maintenance appointments of < six months or > six months did not influence the incidence of peri-implant disease when considering the matching of cases and controls by risk profile. MDPI 2019-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6406564/ /pubmed/30781553 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020252 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article de Araújo Nobre, Miguel Salvado, Francisco Nogueira, Paulo Rocha, Evangelista Ilg, Peter Maló, Paulo A Peri-Implant Disease Risk Score for Patients with Dental Implants: Validation and the Influence of the Interval between Maintenance Appointments |
title | A Peri-Implant Disease Risk Score for Patients with Dental Implants: Validation and the Influence of the Interval between Maintenance Appointments |
title_full | A Peri-Implant Disease Risk Score for Patients with Dental Implants: Validation and the Influence of the Interval between Maintenance Appointments |
title_fullStr | A Peri-Implant Disease Risk Score for Patients with Dental Implants: Validation and the Influence of the Interval between Maintenance Appointments |
title_full_unstemmed | A Peri-Implant Disease Risk Score for Patients with Dental Implants: Validation and the Influence of the Interval between Maintenance Appointments |
title_short | A Peri-Implant Disease Risk Score for Patients with Dental Implants: Validation and the Influence of the Interval between Maintenance Appointments |
title_sort | peri-implant disease risk score for patients with dental implants: validation and the influence of the interval between maintenance appointments |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30781553 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020252 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dearaujonobremiguel aperiimplantdiseaseriskscoreforpatientswithdentalimplantsvalidationandtheinfluenceoftheintervalbetweenmaintenanceappointments AT salvadofrancisco aperiimplantdiseaseriskscoreforpatientswithdentalimplantsvalidationandtheinfluenceoftheintervalbetweenmaintenanceappointments AT nogueirapaulo aperiimplantdiseaseriskscoreforpatientswithdentalimplantsvalidationandtheinfluenceoftheintervalbetweenmaintenanceappointments AT rochaevangelista aperiimplantdiseaseriskscoreforpatientswithdentalimplantsvalidationandtheinfluenceoftheintervalbetweenmaintenanceappointments AT ilgpeter aperiimplantdiseaseriskscoreforpatientswithdentalimplantsvalidationandtheinfluenceoftheintervalbetweenmaintenanceappointments AT malopaulo aperiimplantdiseaseriskscoreforpatientswithdentalimplantsvalidationandtheinfluenceoftheintervalbetweenmaintenanceappointments AT dearaujonobremiguel periimplantdiseaseriskscoreforpatientswithdentalimplantsvalidationandtheinfluenceoftheintervalbetweenmaintenanceappointments AT salvadofrancisco periimplantdiseaseriskscoreforpatientswithdentalimplantsvalidationandtheinfluenceoftheintervalbetweenmaintenanceappointments AT nogueirapaulo periimplantdiseaseriskscoreforpatientswithdentalimplantsvalidationandtheinfluenceoftheintervalbetweenmaintenanceappointments AT rochaevangelista periimplantdiseaseriskscoreforpatientswithdentalimplantsvalidationandtheinfluenceoftheintervalbetweenmaintenanceappointments AT ilgpeter periimplantdiseaseriskscoreforpatientswithdentalimplantsvalidationandtheinfluenceoftheintervalbetweenmaintenanceappointments AT malopaulo periimplantdiseaseriskscoreforpatientswithdentalimplantsvalidationandtheinfluenceoftheintervalbetweenmaintenanceappointments |