Cargando…

Composite Alloplastic Biomaterial vs. Autologous Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Ridge Preservation

Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the clinical and histological differences of using a combination of alloplastic beta triphasic calcium phosphate (β-TCP) and a cross-linked collagen membrane versus autologous platelet-rich fibrin (PRF-L) in ridge preservation after dental extraction. Materi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mendoza-Azpur, Gerardo, Olaechea, Allinson, Padial-Molina, Miguel, Gutiérrez-Garrido, Lourdes, O’Valle, Francisco, Mesa, Francisco, Galindo-Moreno, Pablo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30744095
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020223
_version_ 1783401356100370432
author Mendoza-Azpur, Gerardo
Olaechea, Allinson
Padial-Molina, Miguel
Gutiérrez-Garrido, Lourdes
O’Valle, Francisco
Mesa, Francisco
Galindo-Moreno, Pablo
author_facet Mendoza-Azpur, Gerardo
Olaechea, Allinson
Padial-Molina, Miguel
Gutiérrez-Garrido, Lourdes
O’Valle, Francisco
Mesa, Francisco
Galindo-Moreno, Pablo
author_sort Mendoza-Azpur, Gerardo
collection PubMed
description Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the clinical and histological differences of using a combination of alloplastic beta triphasic calcium phosphate (β-TCP) and a cross-linked collagen membrane versus autologous platelet-rich fibrin (PRF-L) in ridge preservation after dental extraction. Material and methods: Fifty-one patients were included in this observational case-series study. Dental extractions were performed, after which 25 patients were grafted with β-TCP and 26 with PRF-L. After four months of healing, clinical, radiological, histomorphometric and histological evaluations were performed. Results: A significantly higher percentage of mineralized tissue was observed in samples from the PRF-L grafted areas. Cellularity was higher in PRF-L grafted areas (osteocytes in newly formed bone per mm(2) = 123.25 (5.12) vs. 84.02 (26.53) for PRF-L and β-TCP, respectively, p = 0.01). However, sockets grafted with PRF-L showed a higher reduction in the bucco-lingual dimension after four months of healing (2.19 (0.80) vs. 1.16 (0.55) mm, p < 0.001), as well as a higher alteration in the final position of the mid muco-gingival junction (1.73 (1.34) vs. 0.88 (0.88) mm, p < 0.01). Conclusion: PRF-L concentrate accelerates wound healing in post-extraction sockets in terms of new mineralized tissue component. However, the use of β-TCP biomaterial appears to be superior to maintain bucco-lingual volume and the final position of the muco-gingival junction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6406621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64066212019-03-22 Composite Alloplastic Biomaterial vs. Autologous Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Ridge Preservation Mendoza-Azpur, Gerardo Olaechea, Allinson Padial-Molina, Miguel Gutiérrez-Garrido, Lourdes O’Valle, Francisco Mesa, Francisco Galindo-Moreno, Pablo J Clin Med Article Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the clinical and histological differences of using a combination of alloplastic beta triphasic calcium phosphate (β-TCP) and a cross-linked collagen membrane versus autologous platelet-rich fibrin (PRF-L) in ridge preservation after dental extraction. Material and methods: Fifty-one patients were included in this observational case-series study. Dental extractions were performed, after which 25 patients were grafted with β-TCP and 26 with PRF-L. After four months of healing, clinical, radiological, histomorphometric and histological evaluations were performed. Results: A significantly higher percentage of mineralized tissue was observed in samples from the PRF-L grafted areas. Cellularity was higher in PRF-L grafted areas (osteocytes in newly formed bone per mm(2) = 123.25 (5.12) vs. 84.02 (26.53) for PRF-L and β-TCP, respectively, p = 0.01). However, sockets grafted with PRF-L showed a higher reduction in the bucco-lingual dimension after four months of healing (2.19 (0.80) vs. 1.16 (0.55) mm, p < 0.001), as well as a higher alteration in the final position of the mid muco-gingival junction (1.73 (1.34) vs. 0.88 (0.88) mm, p < 0.01). Conclusion: PRF-L concentrate accelerates wound healing in post-extraction sockets in terms of new mineralized tissue component. However, the use of β-TCP biomaterial appears to be superior to maintain bucco-lingual volume and the final position of the muco-gingival junction. MDPI 2019-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6406621/ /pubmed/30744095 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020223 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mendoza-Azpur, Gerardo
Olaechea, Allinson
Padial-Molina, Miguel
Gutiérrez-Garrido, Lourdes
O’Valle, Francisco
Mesa, Francisco
Galindo-Moreno, Pablo
Composite Alloplastic Biomaterial vs. Autologous Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Ridge Preservation
title Composite Alloplastic Biomaterial vs. Autologous Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Ridge Preservation
title_full Composite Alloplastic Biomaterial vs. Autologous Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Ridge Preservation
title_fullStr Composite Alloplastic Biomaterial vs. Autologous Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Ridge Preservation
title_full_unstemmed Composite Alloplastic Biomaterial vs. Autologous Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Ridge Preservation
title_short Composite Alloplastic Biomaterial vs. Autologous Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Ridge Preservation
title_sort composite alloplastic biomaterial vs. autologous platelet-rich fibrin in ridge preservation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30744095
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020223
work_keys_str_mv AT mendozaazpurgerardo compositealloplasticbiomaterialvsautologousplateletrichfibrininridgepreservation
AT olaecheaallinson compositealloplasticbiomaterialvsautologousplateletrichfibrininridgepreservation
AT padialmolinamiguel compositealloplasticbiomaterialvsautologousplateletrichfibrininridgepreservation
AT gutierrezgarridolourdes compositealloplasticbiomaterialvsautologousplateletrichfibrininridgepreservation
AT ovallefrancisco compositealloplasticbiomaterialvsautologousplateletrichfibrininridgepreservation
AT mesafrancisco compositealloplasticbiomaterialvsautologousplateletrichfibrininridgepreservation
AT galindomorenopablo compositealloplasticbiomaterialvsautologousplateletrichfibrininridgepreservation