Cargando…

Prognostic Factors of Early Stage Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma

We aimed to determine prognostic factors of early stage (I/II) epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) including clinicopathologic and chemotherapeutic regimens. Four hundred and thirty-seven women who underwent primary staging surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsieh, Shu-Feng, Lau, Hei-Yu, Wu, Hua-Hsi, Hsu, Heng-Cheng, Twu, Nae-Fang, Cheng, Wen-Fang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30795566
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16040637
_version_ 1783401379336814592
author Hsieh, Shu-Feng
Lau, Hei-Yu
Wu, Hua-Hsi
Hsu, Heng-Cheng
Twu, Nae-Fang
Cheng, Wen-Fang
author_facet Hsieh, Shu-Feng
Lau, Hei-Yu
Wu, Hua-Hsi
Hsu, Heng-Cheng
Twu, Nae-Fang
Cheng, Wen-Fang
author_sort Hsieh, Shu-Feng
collection PubMed
description We aimed to determine prognostic factors of early stage (I/II) epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) including clinicopathologic and chemotherapeutic regimens. Four hundred and thirty-seven women who underwent primary staging surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2010 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed from two medical centers. The prognostic factors were determined from multivariate survival analyses using Cox regression models. The majority of women were diagnosed with stage Ic (244/437, 55.8%). The histopathologic types were clear cell (37.5%), endometrioid (27.2%), serous (14.0%), and mucinous (13.3%). Fifty-seven percent (249/437) of the women received taxane-based (platinum plus paclitaxel) regimens and 43.0% received non-taxane (platinum plus cyclophosphamide) regimens as frontline adjuvant chemotherapy. Clear cell tumors (adjusted Hazard ratio (aHR) 0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21–0.73, p = 0.001) showed better 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) than serous tumors. Women diagnosed at FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage II (aHR 5.97, 95% CI = 2.47–14.39, p < 0.001), grade 3 tumor without clear cell (aHR 2.28, 95% CI = 1.02–5.07, p = 0.004) and who received 3–5 cycles of non-taxane regimens (aHR 3.29, 95% CI = 1.47–7.34, p = 0.004) had worse 5-year overall survival (OS). Clear cell histology treated with taxane-based regimens showed significantly higher 5-year DFS (91.2% vs. 82.0%, aHR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.21–0.93, p = 0.043) and 5-year OS (93.5% vs. 79.0%, aHR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.13–0.70, p = 0.005) than those treated with non-taxane-based regimens. We conclude that stage, tumor grade, and chemotherapeutic regimens/cycles are independent prognostic factors for early stage ovarian cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6406698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64066982019-03-21 Prognostic Factors of Early Stage Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma Hsieh, Shu-Feng Lau, Hei-Yu Wu, Hua-Hsi Hsu, Heng-Cheng Twu, Nae-Fang Cheng, Wen-Fang Int J Environ Res Public Health Article We aimed to determine prognostic factors of early stage (I/II) epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) including clinicopathologic and chemotherapeutic regimens. Four hundred and thirty-seven women who underwent primary staging surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2010 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed from two medical centers. The prognostic factors were determined from multivariate survival analyses using Cox regression models. The majority of women were diagnosed with stage Ic (244/437, 55.8%). The histopathologic types were clear cell (37.5%), endometrioid (27.2%), serous (14.0%), and mucinous (13.3%). Fifty-seven percent (249/437) of the women received taxane-based (platinum plus paclitaxel) regimens and 43.0% received non-taxane (platinum plus cyclophosphamide) regimens as frontline adjuvant chemotherapy. Clear cell tumors (adjusted Hazard ratio (aHR) 0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21–0.73, p = 0.001) showed better 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) than serous tumors. Women diagnosed at FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage II (aHR 5.97, 95% CI = 2.47–14.39, p < 0.001), grade 3 tumor without clear cell (aHR 2.28, 95% CI = 1.02–5.07, p = 0.004) and who received 3–5 cycles of non-taxane regimens (aHR 3.29, 95% CI = 1.47–7.34, p = 0.004) had worse 5-year overall survival (OS). Clear cell histology treated with taxane-based regimens showed significantly higher 5-year DFS (91.2% vs. 82.0%, aHR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.21–0.93, p = 0.043) and 5-year OS (93.5% vs. 79.0%, aHR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.13–0.70, p = 0.005) than those treated with non-taxane-based regimens. We conclude that stage, tumor grade, and chemotherapeutic regimens/cycles are independent prognostic factors for early stage ovarian cancer. MDPI 2019-02-21 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6406698/ /pubmed/30795566 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16040637 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hsieh, Shu-Feng
Lau, Hei-Yu
Wu, Hua-Hsi
Hsu, Heng-Cheng
Twu, Nae-Fang
Cheng, Wen-Fang
Prognostic Factors of Early Stage Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma
title Prognostic Factors of Early Stage Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma
title_full Prognostic Factors of Early Stage Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma
title_fullStr Prognostic Factors of Early Stage Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Factors of Early Stage Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma
title_short Prognostic Factors of Early Stage Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma
title_sort prognostic factors of early stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30795566
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16040637
work_keys_str_mv AT hsiehshufeng prognosticfactorsofearlystageepithelialovariancarcinoma
AT lauheiyu prognosticfactorsofearlystageepithelialovariancarcinoma
AT wuhuahsi prognosticfactorsofearlystageepithelialovariancarcinoma
AT hsuhengcheng prognosticfactorsofearlystageepithelialovariancarcinoma
AT twunaefang prognosticfactorsofearlystageepithelialovariancarcinoma
AT chengwenfang prognosticfactorsofearlystageepithelialovariancarcinoma