Cargando…

Coronary Physiology in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory

Coronary angiography has been the principle modality for assessing the severity of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease for several decades. However, there is a complex relationship between angiographic coronary stenosis and the presence or absence of myocardial ischemia. Recent technological adv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shah, Samit M., Pfau, Steven E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30781631
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020255
_version_ 1783401406898634752
author Shah, Samit M.
Pfau, Steven E.
author_facet Shah, Samit M.
Pfau, Steven E.
author_sort Shah, Samit M.
collection PubMed
description Coronary angiography has been the principle modality for assessing the severity of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease for several decades. However, there is a complex relationship between angiographic coronary stenosis and the presence or absence of myocardial ischemia. Recent technological advances now allow for the assessment of coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory at the time of diagnostic coronary angiography. Early studies focused on coronary flow reserve (CFR) but more recent work has demonstrated the physiologic accuracy and prognostic value of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave free ratio (iFR) for the assessment of coronary artery disease. These measurements have been validated in large multi-center clinical trials and have become indispensable tools for guiding revascularization in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. The physiological assessment of chest pain in the absence of epicardial coronary artery disease involves coronary thermodilution to obtain the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) or Doppler velocity measurement to determine the coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR). Physiology-based coronary artery assessment brings “personalized medicine” to the catheterization laboratory and allows cardiologists and referring providers to make decisions based on objective findings and evidence-based treatment algorithms. The purpose of this review is to describe the theory, technical aspects, and relevant clinical trials related to coronary physiology assessment for an intended audience of general medical practitioners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6406799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64067992019-03-22 Coronary Physiology in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Shah, Samit M. Pfau, Steven E. J Clin Med Review Coronary angiography has been the principle modality for assessing the severity of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease for several decades. However, there is a complex relationship between angiographic coronary stenosis and the presence or absence of myocardial ischemia. Recent technological advances now allow for the assessment of coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory at the time of diagnostic coronary angiography. Early studies focused on coronary flow reserve (CFR) but more recent work has demonstrated the physiologic accuracy and prognostic value of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave free ratio (iFR) for the assessment of coronary artery disease. These measurements have been validated in large multi-center clinical trials and have become indispensable tools for guiding revascularization in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. The physiological assessment of chest pain in the absence of epicardial coronary artery disease involves coronary thermodilution to obtain the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) or Doppler velocity measurement to determine the coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR). Physiology-based coronary artery assessment brings “personalized medicine” to the catheterization laboratory and allows cardiologists and referring providers to make decisions based on objective findings and evidence-based treatment algorithms. The purpose of this review is to describe the theory, technical aspects, and relevant clinical trials related to coronary physiology assessment for an intended audience of general medical practitioners. MDPI 2019-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6406799/ /pubmed/30781631 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020255 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Shah, Samit M.
Pfau, Steven E.
Coronary Physiology in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory
title Coronary Physiology in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory
title_full Coronary Physiology in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory
title_fullStr Coronary Physiology in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory
title_full_unstemmed Coronary Physiology in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory
title_short Coronary Physiology in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory
title_sort coronary physiology in the cardiac catheterization laboratory
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30781631
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020255
work_keys_str_mv AT shahsamitm coronaryphysiologyinthecardiaccatheterizationlaboratory
AT pfaustevene coronaryphysiologyinthecardiaccatheterizationlaboratory