Cargando…

Comparison of Simple Stylet versus Lighted Stylet for Intubating the Trachea with a Direct Laryngoscope: A Randomized Clinical Trial

This study investigated the effectiveness of a lighted stylet during tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy. The study randomly assigned 284 patients undergoing general anesthesia to either the simple stylet (Group S) or lighted stylet (Group L) groups. In both groups, stylet-assisted intubati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Seongjoo, Hong, Jeongpyo, Park, Jin-Woo, Han, Sung-Hee, Kim, Jin-Hee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30691054
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020140
_version_ 1783401410257223680
author Park, Seongjoo
Hong, Jeongpyo
Park, Jin-Woo
Han, Sung-Hee
Kim, Jin-Hee
author_facet Park, Seongjoo
Hong, Jeongpyo
Park, Jin-Woo
Han, Sung-Hee
Kim, Jin-Hee
author_sort Park, Seongjoo
collection PubMed
description This study investigated the effectiveness of a lighted stylet during tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy. The study randomly assigned 284 patients undergoing general anesthesia to either the simple stylet (Group S) or lighted stylet (Group L) groups. In both groups, stylet-assisted intubation was performed with direct laryngoscopy. In group S, a simple stylet was used and removed when the tip of the endotracheal tube was thought to have passed the larynx. In Group L, a lighted stylet was used and removed after confirming transillumination of the suprasternal notch. The success rate at the first attempt, total intubation time, incidence of mucosal bleeding, and severity of postoperative sore throat were compared. Compared to a simple stylet, the lighted stylet significantly increased the success rate of tracheal intubation at the first attempt (128 (90%) vs. 140 (99%), p = 0.003, Groups S and L, respectively). The incidence of mucosal bleeding was significantly higher in Group S (35 (25%) vs. 19 (13%), p = 0.011, Groups S and L, respectively). The total intubation time and degree of postoperative sore throat were not significantly different between the two groups. A lighted stylet increased the success rate of tracheal intubation during stylet-assisted tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6406813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64068132019-03-22 Comparison of Simple Stylet versus Lighted Stylet for Intubating the Trachea with a Direct Laryngoscope: A Randomized Clinical Trial Park, Seongjoo Hong, Jeongpyo Park, Jin-Woo Han, Sung-Hee Kim, Jin-Hee J Clin Med Article This study investigated the effectiveness of a lighted stylet during tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy. The study randomly assigned 284 patients undergoing general anesthesia to either the simple stylet (Group S) or lighted stylet (Group L) groups. In both groups, stylet-assisted intubation was performed with direct laryngoscopy. In group S, a simple stylet was used and removed when the tip of the endotracheal tube was thought to have passed the larynx. In Group L, a lighted stylet was used and removed after confirming transillumination of the suprasternal notch. The success rate at the first attempt, total intubation time, incidence of mucosal bleeding, and severity of postoperative sore throat were compared. Compared to a simple stylet, the lighted stylet significantly increased the success rate of tracheal intubation at the first attempt (128 (90%) vs. 140 (99%), p = 0.003, Groups S and L, respectively). The incidence of mucosal bleeding was significantly higher in Group S (35 (25%) vs. 19 (13%), p = 0.011, Groups S and L, respectively). The total intubation time and degree of postoperative sore throat were not significantly different between the two groups. A lighted stylet increased the success rate of tracheal intubation during stylet-assisted tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy. MDPI 2019-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6406813/ /pubmed/30691054 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020140 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Park, Seongjoo
Hong, Jeongpyo
Park, Jin-Woo
Han, Sung-Hee
Kim, Jin-Hee
Comparison of Simple Stylet versus Lighted Stylet for Intubating the Trachea with a Direct Laryngoscope: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title Comparison of Simple Stylet versus Lighted Stylet for Intubating the Trachea with a Direct Laryngoscope: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Comparison of Simple Stylet versus Lighted Stylet for Intubating the Trachea with a Direct Laryngoscope: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of Simple Stylet versus Lighted Stylet for Intubating the Trachea with a Direct Laryngoscope: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Simple Stylet versus Lighted Stylet for Intubating the Trachea with a Direct Laryngoscope: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Comparison of Simple Stylet versus Lighted Stylet for Intubating the Trachea with a Direct Laryngoscope: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort comparison of simple stylet versus lighted stylet for intubating the trachea with a direct laryngoscope: a randomized clinical trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30691054
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020140
work_keys_str_mv AT parkseongjoo comparisonofsimplestyletversuslightedstyletforintubatingthetracheawithadirectlaryngoscopearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT hongjeongpyo comparisonofsimplestyletversuslightedstyletforintubatingthetracheawithadirectlaryngoscopearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT parkjinwoo comparisonofsimplestyletversuslightedstyletforintubatingthetracheawithadirectlaryngoscopearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT hansunghee comparisonofsimplestyletversuslightedstyletforintubatingthetracheawithadirectlaryngoscopearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kimjinhee comparisonofsimplestyletversuslightedstyletforintubatingthetracheawithadirectlaryngoscopearandomizedclinicaltrial