Cargando…

A Retrospective Dosimetric Study of Radiotherapy Patients with Left-Sided Breast Cancer; Patient Selection Criteria for Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Technique

Background: Several studies have investigated cardiac dose reduction when utilizing the deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique in patients undergoing radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer. This paper aims to recommend potential selection criteria based on a retrospective single institute...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dell’Oro, Mikaela, Giles, Eileen, Sharkey, Amy, Borg, Martin, Connell, Caroline, Bezak, Eva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30813346
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11020259
_version_ 1783401410721742848
author Dell’Oro, Mikaela
Giles, Eileen
Sharkey, Amy
Borg, Martin
Connell, Caroline
Bezak, Eva
author_facet Dell’Oro, Mikaela
Giles, Eileen
Sharkey, Amy
Borg, Martin
Connell, Caroline
Bezak, Eva
author_sort Dell’Oro, Mikaela
collection PubMed
description Background: Several studies have investigated cardiac dose reduction when utilizing the deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique in patients undergoing radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer. This paper aims to recommend potential selection criteria based on a retrospective single institute study of free breathing (FB) and DIBH computed tomography (CT) simulation planning scans. Methods: Dosimetric comparisons were performed retrospectively for 20 patients correlating the dose reduction and patient anatomical factors (anatomical variation of chest shape, chest wall separation, total lung volume (TLV) and others). Results: Paired t-tests demonstrated significant cardiac dose reduction for most patients but not all. Minimal cardiac dose reduction was observed for three patients using their DIBH plan, with one patient receiving a higher dose. Linear regression analysis identified a positive correlation between the patient’s TLV (on the FB CT simulation scan) and the magnitude of dosimetric benefit received (0.4045 R(2)). Conclusion: The TLV measured on a FB plan could potentially be utilised to predict cardiac exposure and assist with patient selection for DIBH. This is important in resource allocation, as DIBH may be unnecessarily recommended for some patients with little dosimetric benefit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6406815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64068152019-03-21 A Retrospective Dosimetric Study of Radiotherapy Patients with Left-Sided Breast Cancer; Patient Selection Criteria for Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Technique Dell’Oro, Mikaela Giles, Eileen Sharkey, Amy Borg, Martin Connell, Caroline Bezak, Eva Cancers (Basel) Article Background: Several studies have investigated cardiac dose reduction when utilizing the deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique in patients undergoing radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer. This paper aims to recommend potential selection criteria based on a retrospective single institute study of free breathing (FB) and DIBH computed tomography (CT) simulation planning scans. Methods: Dosimetric comparisons were performed retrospectively for 20 patients correlating the dose reduction and patient anatomical factors (anatomical variation of chest shape, chest wall separation, total lung volume (TLV) and others). Results: Paired t-tests demonstrated significant cardiac dose reduction for most patients but not all. Minimal cardiac dose reduction was observed for three patients using their DIBH plan, with one patient receiving a higher dose. Linear regression analysis identified a positive correlation between the patient’s TLV (on the FB CT simulation scan) and the magnitude of dosimetric benefit received (0.4045 R(2)). Conclusion: The TLV measured on a FB plan could potentially be utilised to predict cardiac exposure and assist with patient selection for DIBH. This is important in resource allocation, as DIBH may be unnecessarily recommended for some patients with little dosimetric benefit. MDPI 2019-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6406815/ /pubmed/30813346 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11020259 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dell’Oro, Mikaela
Giles, Eileen
Sharkey, Amy
Borg, Martin
Connell, Caroline
Bezak, Eva
A Retrospective Dosimetric Study of Radiotherapy Patients with Left-Sided Breast Cancer; Patient Selection Criteria for Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Technique
title A Retrospective Dosimetric Study of Radiotherapy Patients with Left-Sided Breast Cancer; Patient Selection Criteria for Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Technique
title_full A Retrospective Dosimetric Study of Radiotherapy Patients with Left-Sided Breast Cancer; Patient Selection Criteria for Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Technique
title_fullStr A Retrospective Dosimetric Study of Radiotherapy Patients with Left-Sided Breast Cancer; Patient Selection Criteria for Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Technique
title_full_unstemmed A Retrospective Dosimetric Study of Radiotherapy Patients with Left-Sided Breast Cancer; Patient Selection Criteria for Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Technique
title_short A Retrospective Dosimetric Study of Radiotherapy Patients with Left-Sided Breast Cancer; Patient Selection Criteria for Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Technique
title_sort retrospective dosimetric study of radiotherapy patients with left-sided breast cancer; patient selection criteria for deep inspiration breath hold technique
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30813346
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11020259
work_keys_str_mv AT delloromikaela aretrospectivedosimetricstudyofradiotherapypatientswithleftsidedbreastcancerpatientselectioncriteriafordeepinspirationbreathholdtechnique
AT gileseileen aretrospectivedosimetricstudyofradiotherapypatientswithleftsidedbreastcancerpatientselectioncriteriafordeepinspirationbreathholdtechnique
AT sharkeyamy aretrospectivedosimetricstudyofradiotherapypatientswithleftsidedbreastcancerpatientselectioncriteriafordeepinspirationbreathholdtechnique
AT borgmartin aretrospectivedosimetricstudyofradiotherapypatientswithleftsidedbreastcancerpatientselectioncriteriafordeepinspirationbreathholdtechnique
AT connellcaroline aretrospectivedosimetricstudyofradiotherapypatientswithleftsidedbreastcancerpatientselectioncriteriafordeepinspirationbreathholdtechnique
AT bezakeva aretrospectivedosimetricstudyofradiotherapypatientswithleftsidedbreastcancerpatientselectioncriteriafordeepinspirationbreathholdtechnique
AT delloromikaela retrospectivedosimetricstudyofradiotherapypatientswithleftsidedbreastcancerpatientselectioncriteriafordeepinspirationbreathholdtechnique
AT gileseileen retrospectivedosimetricstudyofradiotherapypatientswithleftsidedbreastcancerpatientselectioncriteriafordeepinspirationbreathholdtechnique
AT sharkeyamy retrospectivedosimetricstudyofradiotherapypatientswithleftsidedbreastcancerpatientselectioncriteriafordeepinspirationbreathholdtechnique
AT borgmartin retrospectivedosimetricstudyofradiotherapypatientswithleftsidedbreastcancerpatientselectioncriteriafordeepinspirationbreathholdtechnique
AT connellcaroline retrospectivedosimetricstudyofradiotherapypatientswithleftsidedbreastcancerpatientselectioncriteriafordeepinspirationbreathholdtechnique
AT bezakeva retrospectivedosimetricstudyofradiotherapypatientswithleftsidedbreastcancerpatientselectioncriteriafordeepinspirationbreathholdtechnique