Cargando…
Coronary Artery Bypass in Young Patients—On or Off-Pump?
A definitive conclusion regarding whether on-pump or off-pump coronary artery bypass is preferable in young patients is lacking. The aim of our study was to perform a long-term comparison of the two approaches in young patients. We analyzed the National Health Insurance Research Database, using data...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6407132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30678203 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020128 |
_version_ | 1783401478047662080 |
---|---|
author | Okano, Ryoi Liou, Yi-Jia Yu, Hsi-Yu Wu, I-Hui Chou, Nai-Kuan Chen, Yih-Sharng Chi, Nai-Hsin |
author_facet | Okano, Ryoi Liou, Yi-Jia Yu, Hsi-Yu Wu, I-Hui Chou, Nai-Kuan Chen, Yih-Sharng Chi, Nai-Hsin |
author_sort | Okano, Ryoi |
collection | PubMed |
description | A definitive conclusion regarding whether on-pump or off-pump coronary artery bypass is preferable in young patients is lacking. The aim of our study was to perform a long-term comparison of the two approaches in young patients. We analyzed the National Health Insurance Research Database, using data for patients between 18 and 45 years of age who had undergone isolated coronary artery bypass between 2001 and 2011. The study endpoints were: all-cause death, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, and repeat revascularization within 30 days, 1 year, 5 years, and the entire 10-year follow-up period. A total of 344 patients received off-pump surgery and 741 patients received on-pump surgery. Preoperative characteristics and comorbidities were similar in both groups, and all-cause mortality was almost equal (p = 0.716). The 5-year survival rates were 93.9% and 92.2% in the off-pump and on-pump groups, respectively, and the 10-year survival rates were 86.3% and 82.1%, respectively. The repeat revascularization rate was significantly lower in the on-pump group (p = 0.0407). Both the on-pump and off-pump methods offer equally good long-term outcomes in terms of mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. However, the need for repeat revascularization is a concern in the long term after off-pump surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6407132 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64071322019-03-22 Coronary Artery Bypass in Young Patients—On or Off-Pump? Okano, Ryoi Liou, Yi-Jia Yu, Hsi-Yu Wu, I-Hui Chou, Nai-Kuan Chen, Yih-Sharng Chi, Nai-Hsin J Clin Med Article A definitive conclusion regarding whether on-pump or off-pump coronary artery bypass is preferable in young patients is lacking. The aim of our study was to perform a long-term comparison of the two approaches in young patients. We analyzed the National Health Insurance Research Database, using data for patients between 18 and 45 years of age who had undergone isolated coronary artery bypass between 2001 and 2011. The study endpoints were: all-cause death, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, and repeat revascularization within 30 days, 1 year, 5 years, and the entire 10-year follow-up period. A total of 344 patients received off-pump surgery and 741 patients received on-pump surgery. Preoperative characteristics and comorbidities were similar in both groups, and all-cause mortality was almost equal (p = 0.716). The 5-year survival rates were 93.9% and 92.2% in the off-pump and on-pump groups, respectively, and the 10-year survival rates were 86.3% and 82.1%, respectively. The repeat revascularization rate was significantly lower in the on-pump group (p = 0.0407). Both the on-pump and off-pump methods offer equally good long-term outcomes in terms of mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. However, the need for repeat revascularization is a concern in the long term after off-pump surgery. MDPI 2019-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6407132/ /pubmed/30678203 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020128 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Okano, Ryoi Liou, Yi-Jia Yu, Hsi-Yu Wu, I-Hui Chou, Nai-Kuan Chen, Yih-Sharng Chi, Nai-Hsin Coronary Artery Bypass in Young Patients—On or Off-Pump? |
title | Coronary Artery Bypass in Young Patients—On or Off-Pump? |
title_full | Coronary Artery Bypass in Young Patients—On or Off-Pump? |
title_fullStr | Coronary Artery Bypass in Young Patients—On or Off-Pump? |
title_full_unstemmed | Coronary Artery Bypass in Young Patients—On or Off-Pump? |
title_short | Coronary Artery Bypass in Young Patients—On or Off-Pump? |
title_sort | coronary artery bypass in young patients—on or off-pump? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6407132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30678203 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020128 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT okanoryoi coronaryarterybypassinyoungpatientsonoroffpump AT liouyijia coronaryarterybypassinyoungpatientsonoroffpump AT yuhsiyu coronaryarterybypassinyoungpatientsonoroffpump AT wuihui coronaryarterybypassinyoungpatientsonoroffpump AT chounaikuan coronaryarterybypassinyoungpatientsonoroffpump AT chenyihsharng coronaryarterybypassinyoungpatientsonoroffpump AT chinaihsin coronaryarterybypassinyoungpatientsonoroffpump |