Cargando…

Can trauma surgeons keep up? A prospective cohort study comparing outcomes between patients with traumatic brain injury cared for in a trauma versus neuroscience intensive care unit

BACKGROUND: Although many patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are admitted to trauma intensive care units (ICUs), some question whether outcomes would improve if their care was provided in neurocritical care units. We sought to compare characteristics and outcomes of patients with TBI admitte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberts, Derek J, Leonard, Samuel D, Stein, Deborah M, Williams, George W, Wade, Charles E, Cotton, Bryan A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6407533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30899790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2018-000229
_version_ 1783401574385582080
author Roberts, Derek J
Leonard, Samuel D
Stein, Deborah M
Williams, George W
Wade, Charles E
Cotton, Bryan A
author_facet Roberts, Derek J
Leonard, Samuel D
Stein, Deborah M
Williams, George W
Wade, Charles E
Cotton, Bryan A
author_sort Roberts, Derek J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although many patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are admitted to trauma intensive care units (ICUs), some question whether outcomes would improve if their care was provided in neurocritical care units. We sought to compare characteristics and outcomes of patients with TBI admitted to and cared for in a trauma versus neuroscience ICU. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of adult (≥18 years of age) blunt trauma patients with TBI admitted to a trauma versus neuroscience ICU between May 2015 and December 2016. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate an adjusted odds ratio (OR) comparing 30-day mortality between cohorts. RESULTS: In total, 548 patients were included in the study, including 207 (38%) who were admitted to the trauma ICU and 341 (62%) to the neuroscience ICU. When compared with neuroscience ICU admissions, patients admitted to the trauma ICU were more likely to have sustained their injuries from a high-speed mechanism (71% vs. 34%) and had a higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) (median 25 vs. 16) despite a similar head Abbreviated Injury Scale score (3 vs. 3, p=0.47) (all p<0.05). Trauma ICU patients also had a lower initial Glasgow Coma Scale score (5 vs. 15) and systolic blood pressure (128 mm Hg vs. 136 mm Hg) and were more likely to have fixed or unequal pupils at admission (13% vs. 8%) (all p<0.05). After adjusting for age, ISS, a high-speed mechanism of injury, fixed or unequal pupils at admission, and field intubation, the odds of 30-day mortality was 70% lower among patients admitted to the trauma versus neuroscience ICU (adjusted OR=0.30, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a higher injury burden and worse neurological examination and hemodynamics at presentation, patients admitted to the trauma ICU had a lower adjusted 30-day mortality. This finding may relate to improved care of associated injuries in trauma versus neuroscience ICUs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective comparative study, level II.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6407533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64075332019-03-21 Can trauma surgeons keep up? A prospective cohort study comparing outcomes between patients with traumatic brain injury cared for in a trauma versus neuroscience intensive care unit Roberts, Derek J Leonard, Samuel D Stein, Deborah M Williams, George W Wade, Charles E Cotton, Bryan A Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Although many patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are admitted to trauma intensive care units (ICUs), some question whether outcomes would improve if their care was provided in neurocritical care units. We sought to compare characteristics and outcomes of patients with TBI admitted to and cared for in a trauma versus neuroscience ICU. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of adult (≥18 years of age) blunt trauma patients with TBI admitted to a trauma versus neuroscience ICU between May 2015 and December 2016. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate an adjusted odds ratio (OR) comparing 30-day mortality between cohorts. RESULTS: In total, 548 patients were included in the study, including 207 (38%) who were admitted to the trauma ICU and 341 (62%) to the neuroscience ICU. When compared with neuroscience ICU admissions, patients admitted to the trauma ICU were more likely to have sustained their injuries from a high-speed mechanism (71% vs. 34%) and had a higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) (median 25 vs. 16) despite a similar head Abbreviated Injury Scale score (3 vs. 3, p=0.47) (all p<0.05). Trauma ICU patients also had a lower initial Glasgow Coma Scale score (5 vs. 15) and systolic blood pressure (128 mm Hg vs. 136 mm Hg) and were more likely to have fixed or unequal pupils at admission (13% vs. 8%) (all p<0.05). After adjusting for age, ISS, a high-speed mechanism of injury, fixed or unequal pupils at admission, and field intubation, the odds of 30-day mortality was 70% lower among patients admitted to the trauma versus neuroscience ICU (adjusted OR=0.30, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a higher injury burden and worse neurological examination and hemodynamics at presentation, patients admitted to the trauma ICU had a lower adjusted 30-day mortality. This finding may relate to improved care of associated injuries in trauma versus neuroscience ICUs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective comparative study, level II. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6407533/ /pubmed/30899790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2018-000229 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Roberts, Derek J
Leonard, Samuel D
Stein, Deborah M
Williams, George W
Wade, Charles E
Cotton, Bryan A
Can trauma surgeons keep up? A prospective cohort study comparing outcomes between patients with traumatic brain injury cared for in a trauma versus neuroscience intensive care unit
title Can trauma surgeons keep up? A prospective cohort study comparing outcomes between patients with traumatic brain injury cared for in a trauma versus neuroscience intensive care unit
title_full Can trauma surgeons keep up? A prospective cohort study comparing outcomes between patients with traumatic brain injury cared for in a trauma versus neuroscience intensive care unit
title_fullStr Can trauma surgeons keep up? A prospective cohort study comparing outcomes between patients with traumatic brain injury cared for in a trauma versus neuroscience intensive care unit
title_full_unstemmed Can trauma surgeons keep up? A prospective cohort study comparing outcomes between patients with traumatic brain injury cared for in a trauma versus neuroscience intensive care unit
title_short Can trauma surgeons keep up? A prospective cohort study comparing outcomes between patients with traumatic brain injury cared for in a trauma versus neuroscience intensive care unit
title_sort can trauma surgeons keep up? a prospective cohort study comparing outcomes between patients with traumatic brain injury cared for in a trauma versus neuroscience intensive care unit
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6407533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30899790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2018-000229
work_keys_str_mv AT robertsderekj cantraumasurgeonskeepupaprospectivecohortstudycomparingoutcomesbetweenpatientswithtraumaticbraininjurycaredforinatraumaversusneuroscienceintensivecareunit
AT leonardsamueld cantraumasurgeonskeepupaprospectivecohortstudycomparingoutcomesbetweenpatientswithtraumaticbraininjurycaredforinatraumaversusneuroscienceintensivecareunit
AT steindeborahm cantraumasurgeonskeepupaprospectivecohortstudycomparingoutcomesbetweenpatientswithtraumaticbraininjurycaredforinatraumaversusneuroscienceintensivecareunit
AT williamsgeorgew cantraumasurgeonskeepupaprospectivecohortstudycomparingoutcomesbetweenpatientswithtraumaticbraininjurycaredforinatraumaversusneuroscienceintensivecareunit
AT wadecharlese cantraumasurgeonskeepupaprospectivecohortstudycomparingoutcomesbetweenpatientswithtraumaticbraininjurycaredforinatraumaversusneuroscienceintensivecareunit
AT cottonbryana cantraumasurgeonskeepupaprospectivecohortstudycomparingoutcomesbetweenpatientswithtraumaticbraininjurycaredforinatraumaversusneuroscienceintensivecareunit