Cargando…

MSK30: a validated tool to assess clinical musculoskeletal knowledge

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal (MSK) complaints comprise a large proportion of outpatient visits. However, multiple studies show that medical school curriculum often fails to adequately prepare graduates to diagnose and manage common MSK problems. Current standardised exams inadequately assess trainees...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cummings, Danielle L, Smith, Matthew, Merrigan, Brian, Leggit, Jeffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6407547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30899552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000495
_version_ 1783401578822107136
author Cummings, Danielle L
Smith, Matthew
Merrigan, Brian
Leggit, Jeffrey
author_facet Cummings, Danielle L
Smith, Matthew
Merrigan, Brian
Leggit, Jeffrey
author_sort Cummings, Danielle L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal (MSK) complaints comprise a large proportion of outpatient visits. However, multiple studies show that medical school curriculum often fails to adequately prepare graduates to diagnose and manage common MSK problems. Current standardised exams inadequately assess trainees’ MSK knowledge and other MSK-specific exams such as Freedman and Bernstein’s (1998) exam have limitations in implementation. We propose a new 30-question multiple choice exam for graduating medical students and primary care residents. Results highlight individual deficiencies and identify areas for curriculum improvement. METHODS/RESULTS: We developed a bank of multiple choice questions based on 10 critical topics in MSK medicine. The questions were validated with subject-matter experts (SMEs) using a modified Delphi method to obtain consensus on the importance of each question. Based on the SME input, we compiled 30 questions in the assessment. Results of the large-scale pilot test (167 post-clerkship medical students) were an average score of 74 % (range 53% – 90 %, SD 7.8%). In addition, the tool contains detailed explanations and references were created for each question to allow an individual or group to review and enhance learning. SUMMARY: The proposed MSK30 exam evaluates clinically important topics and offers an assessment tool for clinical MSK knowledge of medical students and residents. It fills a gap in current curriculum and improves on previous MSK-specific assessments through better clinical relevance and consistent grading. Educators can use the results of the exam to guide curriculum development and individual education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6407547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64075472019-03-21 MSK30: a validated tool to assess clinical musculoskeletal knowledge Cummings, Danielle L Smith, Matthew Merrigan, Brian Leggit, Jeffrey BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal (MSK) complaints comprise a large proportion of outpatient visits. However, multiple studies show that medical school curriculum often fails to adequately prepare graduates to diagnose and manage common MSK problems. Current standardised exams inadequately assess trainees’ MSK knowledge and other MSK-specific exams such as Freedman and Bernstein’s (1998) exam have limitations in implementation. We propose a new 30-question multiple choice exam for graduating medical students and primary care residents. Results highlight individual deficiencies and identify areas for curriculum improvement. METHODS/RESULTS: We developed a bank of multiple choice questions based on 10 critical topics in MSK medicine. The questions were validated with subject-matter experts (SMEs) using a modified Delphi method to obtain consensus on the importance of each question. Based on the SME input, we compiled 30 questions in the assessment. Results of the large-scale pilot test (167 post-clerkship medical students) were an average score of 74 % (range 53% – 90 %, SD 7.8%). In addition, the tool contains detailed explanations and references were created for each question to allow an individual or group to review and enhance learning. SUMMARY: The proposed MSK30 exam evaluates clinically important topics and offers an assessment tool for clinical MSK knowledge of medical students and residents. It fills a gap in current curriculum and improves on previous MSK-specific assessments through better clinical relevance and consistent grading. Educators can use the results of the exam to guide curriculum development and individual education. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6407547/ /pubmed/30899552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000495 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Cummings, Danielle L
Smith, Matthew
Merrigan, Brian
Leggit, Jeffrey
MSK30: a validated tool to assess clinical musculoskeletal knowledge
title MSK30: a validated tool to assess clinical musculoskeletal knowledge
title_full MSK30: a validated tool to assess clinical musculoskeletal knowledge
title_fullStr MSK30: a validated tool to assess clinical musculoskeletal knowledge
title_full_unstemmed MSK30: a validated tool to assess clinical musculoskeletal knowledge
title_short MSK30: a validated tool to assess clinical musculoskeletal knowledge
title_sort msk30: a validated tool to assess clinical musculoskeletal knowledge
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6407547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30899552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000495
work_keys_str_mv AT cummingsdaniellel msk30avalidatedtooltoassessclinicalmusculoskeletalknowledge
AT smithmatthew msk30avalidatedtooltoassessclinicalmusculoskeletalknowledge
AT merriganbrian msk30avalidatedtooltoassessclinicalmusculoskeletalknowledge
AT leggitjeffrey msk30avalidatedtooltoassessclinicalmusculoskeletalknowledge