Cargando…

Is there a reliable size cut-off for splenic involvement in lymphoma? A [18F]FDG-PET controlled study

PURPOSE: Aim of present study was to determine whether the currently recommended 13-cm cranio-caudal diameter cut-off on CT for assessment of splenic involvement in lymphoma offers adequate sensitivity and specificity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically proven lymphoma who had under...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berzaczy, Dominik, Haug, Alexander R., Raderer, Markus, Kiesewetter, Barbara, Berzaczy, Gundula, Weber, Michael, Mayerhoefer, Marius E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6407760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30849131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213551
_version_ 1783401622957719552
author Berzaczy, Dominik
Haug, Alexander R.
Raderer, Markus
Kiesewetter, Barbara
Berzaczy, Gundula
Weber, Michael
Mayerhoefer, Marius E.
author_facet Berzaczy, Dominik
Haug, Alexander R.
Raderer, Markus
Kiesewetter, Barbara
Berzaczy, Gundula
Weber, Michael
Mayerhoefer, Marius E.
author_sort Berzaczy, Dominik
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Aim of present study was to determine whether the currently recommended 13-cm cranio-caudal diameter cut-off on CT for assessment of splenic involvement in lymphoma offers adequate sensitivity and specificity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically proven lymphoma who had undergone [18F]FDG-PET/CT before therapy were included. Cranio-caudal diameters of the spleen were measured on the CT component of PET/CT, and ROC analyses with calculation of respective areas under the curve (AUC) were used to determine cut-off values of cranio-caudal measurements with their respective sensitivities and specificities, using [18F]FDG-PET as the reference standard. RESULTS: In 93 patients, we found a sensitivity of 74.1% and a specificity of 47% for the 13-cm splenic diameter cut-off. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show reasonable, though far from perfect sensitivities and specificities for the currently recommend 13-cm splenic diameter cut-off.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6407760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64077602019-03-17 Is there a reliable size cut-off for splenic involvement in lymphoma? A [18F]FDG-PET controlled study Berzaczy, Dominik Haug, Alexander R. Raderer, Markus Kiesewetter, Barbara Berzaczy, Gundula Weber, Michael Mayerhoefer, Marius E. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: Aim of present study was to determine whether the currently recommended 13-cm cranio-caudal diameter cut-off on CT for assessment of splenic involvement in lymphoma offers adequate sensitivity and specificity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically proven lymphoma who had undergone [18F]FDG-PET/CT before therapy were included. Cranio-caudal diameters of the spleen were measured on the CT component of PET/CT, and ROC analyses with calculation of respective areas under the curve (AUC) were used to determine cut-off values of cranio-caudal measurements with their respective sensitivities and specificities, using [18F]FDG-PET as the reference standard. RESULTS: In 93 patients, we found a sensitivity of 74.1% and a specificity of 47% for the 13-cm splenic diameter cut-off. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show reasonable, though far from perfect sensitivities and specificities for the currently recommend 13-cm splenic diameter cut-off. Public Library of Science 2019-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6407760/ /pubmed/30849131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213551 Text en © 2019 Berzaczy et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Berzaczy, Dominik
Haug, Alexander R.
Raderer, Markus
Kiesewetter, Barbara
Berzaczy, Gundula
Weber, Michael
Mayerhoefer, Marius E.
Is there a reliable size cut-off for splenic involvement in lymphoma? A [18F]FDG-PET controlled study
title Is there a reliable size cut-off for splenic involvement in lymphoma? A [18F]FDG-PET controlled study
title_full Is there a reliable size cut-off for splenic involvement in lymphoma? A [18F]FDG-PET controlled study
title_fullStr Is there a reliable size cut-off for splenic involvement in lymphoma? A [18F]FDG-PET controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Is there a reliable size cut-off for splenic involvement in lymphoma? A [18F]FDG-PET controlled study
title_short Is there a reliable size cut-off for splenic involvement in lymphoma? A [18F]FDG-PET controlled study
title_sort is there a reliable size cut-off for splenic involvement in lymphoma? a [18f]fdg-pet controlled study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6407760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30849131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213551
work_keys_str_mv AT berzaczydominik isthereareliablesizecutoffforsplenicinvolvementinlymphomaa18ffdgpetcontrolledstudy
AT haugalexanderr isthereareliablesizecutoffforsplenicinvolvementinlymphomaa18ffdgpetcontrolledstudy
AT raderermarkus isthereareliablesizecutoffforsplenicinvolvementinlymphomaa18ffdgpetcontrolledstudy
AT kiesewetterbarbara isthereareliablesizecutoffforsplenicinvolvementinlymphomaa18ffdgpetcontrolledstudy
AT berzaczygundula isthereareliablesizecutoffforsplenicinvolvementinlymphomaa18ffdgpetcontrolledstudy
AT webermichael isthereareliablesizecutoffforsplenicinvolvementinlymphomaa18ffdgpetcontrolledstudy
AT mayerhoefermariuse isthereareliablesizecutoffforsplenicinvolvementinlymphomaa18ffdgpetcontrolledstudy