Cargando…

Strategies to Improve Follow-up After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests in a Community-Based Setting: A Mixed-Methods Study

The effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening for colorectal cancer depends on timely colonoscopy follow-up of positive tests, although limited data exist regarding effective system-level strategies for improving follow-up rates. METHODS: Using a mixed-methods design (qualitative an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Selby, Kevin, Jensen, Christopher D., Zhao, Wei K., Lee, Jeffrey K., Slam, Arielle, Schottinger, Joanne E., Bacchetti, Peter, Levin, Theodore R., Corley, Douglas A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6407828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30829917
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000010
_version_ 1783401643644026880
author Selby, Kevin
Jensen, Christopher D.
Zhao, Wei K.
Lee, Jeffrey K.
Slam, Arielle
Schottinger, Joanne E.
Bacchetti, Peter
Levin, Theodore R.
Corley, Douglas A.
author_facet Selby, Kevin
Jensen, Christopher D.
Zhao, Wei K.
Lee, Jeffrey K.
Slam, Arielle
Schottinger, Joanne E.
Bacchetti, Peter
Levin, Theodore R.
Corley, Douglas A.
author_sort Selby, Kevin
collection PubMed
description The effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening for colorectal cancer depends on timely colonoscopy follow-up of positive tests, although limited data exist regarding effective system-level strategies for improving follow-up rates. METHODS: Using a mixed-methods design (qualitative and quantitative), we first identified system-level strategies that were implemented for improving timely follow-up after a positive FIT test in a large community-based setting between 2006 and 2016. We then evaluated changes in time to colonoscopy among FIT-positive patients across 3 periods during the study interval, controlling for screening participant age, sex, race/ethnicity, comorbidity, FIT date, and previous screening history. RESULTS: Implemented strategies over the study period included setting a goal of colonoscopy follow-up within 30 days of a positive FIT, tracking FIT-positive patients, early telephone contact to directly schedule follow-up colonoscopies, assigning the responsibility for follow-up tracking and scheduling to gastroenterology departments (vs primary care), and increasing colonoscopy capacity. Among 160,051 patients who had a positive FIT between 2006 and 2016, 126,420 (79%) had a follow-up colonoscopy within 180 days, including 67% in 2006–2008, 79% in 2009–2012, and 83% in 2013–2016 (P < 0.001). Follow-up within 180 days in 2016 varied moderately across service areas, between 72% (95% CI 70–75) and 88% (95% CI 86–91), but there were no obvious differences in the pattern of strategies implemented in higher- vs lower-performing service areas. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of system-level strategies coincided with substantial improvements in timely colonoscopy follow-up after a positive FIT. Intervention studies are needed to identify the most effective strategies for promoting timely follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6407828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64078282019-03-16 Strategies to Improve Follow-up After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests in a Community-Based Setting: A Mixed-Methods Study Selby, Kevin Jensen, Christopher D. Zhao, Wei K. Lee, Jeffrey K. Slam, Arielle Schottinger, Joanne E. Bacchetti, Peter Levin, Theodore R. Corley, Douglas A. Clin Transl Gastroenterol Article The effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening for colorectal cancer depends on timely colonoscopy follow-up of positive tests, although limited data exist regarding effective system-level strategies for improving follow-up rates. METHODS: Using a mixed-methods design (qualitative and quantitative), we first identified system-level strategies that were implemented for improving timely follow-up after a positive FIT test in a large community-based setting between 2006 and 2016. We then evaluated changes in time to colonoscopy among FIT-positive patients across 3 periods during the study interval, controlling for screening participant age, sex, race/ethnicity, comorbidity, FIT date, and previous screening history. RESULTS: Implemented strategies over the study period included setting a goal of colonoscopy follow-up within 30 days of a positive FIT, tracking FIT-positive patients, early telephone contact to directly schedule follow-up colonoscopies, assigning the responsibility for follow-up tracking and scheduling to gastroenterology departments (vs primary care), and increasing colonoscopy capacity. Among 160,051 patients who had a positive FIT between 2006 and 2016, 126,420 (79%) had a follow-up colonoscopy within 180 days, including 67% in 2006–2008, 79% in 2009–2012, and 83% in 2013–2016 (P < 0.001). Follow-up within 180 days in 2016 varied moderately across service areas, between 72% (95% CI 70–75) and 88% (95% CI 86–91), but there were no obvious differences in the pattern of strategies implemented in higher- vs lower-performing service areas. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of system-level strategies coincided with substantial improvements in timely colonoscopy follow-up after a positive FIT. Intervention studies are needed to identify the most effective strategies for promoting timely follow-up. Wolters Kluwer 2019-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6407828/ /pubmed/30829917 http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000010 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology Open Access This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Article
Selby, Kevin
Jensen, Christopher D.
Zhao, Wei K.
Lee, Jeffrey K.
Slam, Arielle
Schottinger, Joanne E.
Bacchetti, Peter
Levin, Theodore R.
Corley, Douglas A.
Strategies to Improve Follow-up After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests in a Community-Based Setting: A Mixed-Methods Study
title Strategies to Improve Follow-up After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests in a Community-Based Setting: A Mixed-Methods Study
title_full Strategies to Improve Follow-up After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests in a Community-Based Setting: A Mixed-Methods Study
title_fullStr Strategies to Improve Follow-up After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests in a Community-Based Setting: A Mixed-Methods Study
title_full_unstemmed Strategies to Improve Follow-up After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests in a Community-Based Setting: A Mixed-Methods Study
title_short Strategies to Improve Follow-up After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests in a Community-Based Setting: A Mixed-Methods Study
title_sort strategies to improve follow-up after positive fecal immunochemical tests in a community-based setting: a mixed-methods study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6407828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30829917
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000010
work_keys_str_mv AT selbykevin strategiestoimprovefollowupafterpositivefecalimmunochemicaltestsinacommunitybasedsettingamixedmethodsstudy
AT jensenchristopherd strategiestoimprovefollowupafterpositivefecalimmunochemicaltestsinacommunitybasedsettingamixedmethodsstudy
AT zhaoweik strategiestoimprovefollowupafterpositivefecalimmunochemicaltestsinacommunitybasedsettingamixedmethodsstudy
AT leejeffreyk strategiestoimprovefollowupafterpositivefecalimmunochemicaltestsinacommunitybasedsettingamixedmethodsstudy
AT slamarielle strategiestoimprovefollowupafterpositivefecalimmunochemicaltestsinacommunitybasedsettingamixedmethodsstudy
AT schottingerjoannee strategiestoimprovefollowupafterpositivefecalimmunochemicaltestsinacommunitybasedsettingamixedmethodsstudy
AT bacchettipeter strategiestoimprovefollowupafterpositivefecalimmunochemicaltestsinacommunitybasedsettingamixedmethodsstudy
AT levintheodorer strategiestoimprovefollowupafterpositivefecalimmunochemicaltestsinacommunitybasedsettingamixedmethodsstudy
AT corleydouglasa strategiestoimprovefollowupafterpositivefecalimmunochemicaltestsinacommunitybasedsettingamixedmethodsstudy