Cargando…

Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness and safety of cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures. METHODS: We searched PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from their inception to February 2016. All RCTs com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Feng Fei, Chen, Yi Fang, Chen, Bin, Lin, Chao Hui, Zheng, Ke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6407990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30813202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014634
_version_ 1783401673402613760
author Lin, Feng Fei
Chen, Yi Fang
Chen, Bin
Lin, Chao Hui
Zheng, Ke
author_facet Lin, Feng Fei
Chen, Yi Fang
Chen, Bin
Lin, Chao Hui
Zheng, Ke
author_sort Lin, Feng Fei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness and safety of cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures. METHODS: We searched PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from their inception to February 2016. All RCTs comparing cemented with uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures were eligible. The participants who underwent primary hemiarthroplasty for unilateral femoral neck fracture were older than 55 and the mean age of more than 75 years old. For the trials before 2006 used old designed prostheses, so we excluded trails before 2006 which used old designed prostheses. Outcomes of interest include postoperative hip function, Harris hip score (HHS), mortality, reoperation rate, complications, operation time, intraoperative blood loss. Two reviewers independently evaluated the included studies and extracted data into RevMan. Quality Assessments were classified by agreement of 2 authors based on the Cochrane tool. RESULTS: Seven trials were eligible. Postoperative hip function at 12 months cemented hemiarthroplasty was better than that in uncemented hemiarthroplasty (OR = 0.52, 95% CI, 0.31–0.88; P = .01). Postoperative fractures rates in cemented hemiarthroplasty were lower than that in uncemented hemiarthroplasty (OR = 0.09, 95% CI, 0.02–0.38; P = .001). Also, the interoperative fracture rates in cemented hemiarthroplasty were lower than that in uncemented hemiarthroplasty (OR = 0.29, 95% CI, 0.13–0.68; P = .004). Shorter operation time was achieved in uncemented hemiarthroplasty than that in cemented hemiarthroplasty (WMD = 8.22 min, 95% CI, 5.57–10.86 min; P<.00001). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with HHS, mortality, wound infection, dislocation, general complications, reoperation rate, and intraoperative blood loss. CONCLUSION: The available evidence indicates that compared with uncemented hemiarthroplasty cemented hemiarthroplasty achieved better postoperative hip function, less postoperative, and interoperative fractures in displaced femoral neck fracture. Uncemented hemiarthroplasty achieved shorter operation time. There was no difference between the 2 groups with HHS at 1 year, mortality, and complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6407990
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64079902019-03-16 Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails Lin, Feng Fei Chen, Yi Fang Chen, Bin Lin, Chao Hui Zheng, Ke Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness and safety of cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures. METHODS: We searched PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from their inception to February 2016. All RCTs comparing cemented with uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures were eligible. The participants who underwent primary hemiarthroplasty for unilateral femoral neck fracture were older than 55 and the mean age of more than 75 years old. For the trials before 2006 used old designed prostheses, so we excluded trails before 2006 which used old designed prostheses. Outcomes of interest include postoperative hip function, Harris hip score (HHS), mortality, reoperation rate, complications, operation time, intraoperative blood loss. Two reviewers independently evaluated the included studies and extracted data into RevMan. Quality Assessments were classified by agreement of 2 authors based on the Cochrane tool. RESULTS: Seven trials were eligible. Postoperative hip function at 12 months cemented hemiarthroplasty was better than that in uncemented hemiarthroplasty (OR = 0.52, 95% CI, 0.31–0.88; P = .01). Postoperative fractures rates in cemented hemiarthroplasty were lower than that in uncemented hemiarthroplasty (OR = 0.09, 95% CI, 0.02–0.38; P = .001). Also, the interoperative fracture rates in cemented hemiarthroplasty were lower than that in uncemented hemiarthroplasty (OR = 0.29, 95% CI, 0.13–0.68; P = .004). Shorter operation time was achieved in uncemented hemiarthroplasty than that in cemented hemiarthroplasty (WMD = 8.22 min, 95% CI, 5.57–10.86 min; P<.00001). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with HHS, mortality, wound infection, dislocation, general complications, reoperation rate, and intraoperative blood loss. CONCLUSION: The available evidence indicates that compared with uncemented hemiarthroplasty cemented hemiarthroplasty achieved better postoperative hip function, less postoperative, and interoperative fractures in displaced femoral neck fracture. Uncemented hemiarthroplasty achieved shorter operation time. There was no difference between the 2 groups with HHS at 1 year, mortality, and complications. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6407990/ /pubmed/30813202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014634 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Lin, Feng Fei
Chen, Yi Fang
Chen, Bin
Lin, Chao Hui
Zheng, Ke
Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails
title Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails
title_full Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails
title_fullStr Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails
title_full_unstemmed Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails
title_short Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails
title_sort cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6407990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30813202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014634
work_keys_str_mv AT linfengfei cementedversusuncementedhemiarthroplastyfordisplacedfemoralneckfracturesametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrails
AT chenyifang cementedversusuncementedhemiarthroplastyfordisplacedfemoralneckfracturesametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrails
AT chenbin cementedversusuncementedhemiarthroplastyfordisplacedfemoralneckfracturesametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrails
AT linchaohui cementedversusuncementedhemiarthroplastyfordisplacedfemoralneckfracturesametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrails
AT zhengke cementedversusuncementedhemiarthroplastyfordisplacedfemoralneckfracturesametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrails