Cargando…

Implementing a perioperative efficiency initiative for orthopedic surgery instrumentation at an academic center: A comparative before-and-after study

Optimizing surgical instrumentation may contribute to value-based care, particularly in commonly performed procedures. We report our experience in implementing a perioperative efficiency program in 2 types of orthopedic surgery (primary total-knee arthroplasty, TKA, and total-hip arthroplasty, THA)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Capra, Richard, Bini, Stefano A., Bowden, Dawn E., Etter, Katherine, Callahan, Matt, Smith, Richard T., Vail, Thomas Parker
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6407992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30762733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014338
_version_ 1783401673964650496
author Capra, Richard
Bini, Stefano A.
Bowden, Dawn E.
Etter, Katherine
Callahan, Matt
Smith, Richard T.
Vail, Thomas Parker
author_facet Capra, Richard
Bini, Stefano A.
Bowden, Dawn E.
Etter, Katherine
Callahan, Matt
Smith, Richard T.
Vail, Thomas Parker
author_sort Capra, Richard
collection PubMed
description Optimizing surgical instrumentation may contribute to value-based care, particularly in commonly performed procedures. We report our experience in implementing a perioperative efficiency program in 2 types of orthopedic surgery (primary total-knee arthroplasty, TKA, and total-hip arthroplasty, THA). A comparative before-and-after study with 2 participating surgeons, each performing both THA and TKA, was conducted. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of surgical tray optimization on operating and processing time, cost, and waste associated with preparation, delivery, and staging of sterile surgical instruments. The study was designed as a prospective quality improvement initiative with pre- and postimplementation operational measures and a provider satisfaction survey. A total of 96 procedures (38 preimplementation and 58 postimplementation) were assessed using time-stamped performance endpoints. The number and weight of trays and instruments processed were reduced substantially after the optimization intervention, particularly for TKA. Setup time was reduced by 23% (6 minutes, P = .01) for TKA procedures but did not differ for THA. The number of survey respondents was small, but satisfaction was high overall among personnel involved in implementation. Optimizing instrumentation trays for orthopedic procedures yielded reduction in processing time and cost. Future research should evaluate patient outcomes and incremental/additive impact on institutional quality measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6407992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64079922019-03-16 Implementing a perioperative efficiency initiative for orthopedic surgery instrumentation at an academic center: A comparative before-and-after study Capra, Richard Bini, Stefano A. Bowden, Dawn E. Etter, Katherine Callahan, Matt Smith, Richard T. Vail, Thomas Parker Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article Optimizing surgical instrumentation may contribute to value-based care, particularly in commonly performed procedures. We report our experience in implementing a perioperative efficiency program in 2 types of orthopedic surgery (primary total-knee arthroplasty, TKA, and total-hip arthroplasty, THA). A comparative before-and-after study with 2 participating surgeons, each performing both THA and TKA, was conducted. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of surgical tray optimization on operating and processing time, cost, and waste associated with preparation, delivery, and staging of sterile surgical instruments. The study was designed as a prospective quality improvement initiative with pre- and postimplementation operational measures and a provider satisfaction survey. A total of 96 procedures (38 preimplementation and 58 postimplementation) were assessed using time-stamped performance endpoints. The number and weight of trays and instruments processed were reduced substantially after the optimization intervention, particularly for TKA. Setup time was reduced by 23% (6 minutes, P = .01) for TKA procedures but did not differ for THA. The number of survey respondents was small, but satisfaction was high overall among personnel involved in implementation. Optimizing instrumentation trays for orthopedic procedures yielded reduction in processing time and cost. Future research should evaluate patient outcomes and incremental/additive impact on institutional quality measures. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6407992/ /pubmed/30762733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014338 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Capra, Richard
Bini, Stefano A.
Bowden, Dawn E.
Etter, Katherine
Callahan, Matt
Smith, Richard T.
Vail, Thomas Parker
Implementing a perioperative efficiency initiative for orthopedic surgery instrumentation at an academic center: A comparative before-and-after study
title Implementing a perioperative efficiency initiative for orthopedic surgery instrumentation at an academic center: A comparative before-and-after study
title_full Implementing a perioperative efficiency initiative for orthopedic surgery instrumentation at an academic center: A comparative before-and-after study
title_fullStr Implementing a perioperative efficiency initiative for orthopedic surgery instrumentation at an academic center: A comparative before-and-after study
title_full_unstemmed Implementing a perioperative efficiency initiative for orthopedic surgery instrumentation at an academic center: A comparative before-and-after study
title_short Implementing a perioperative efficiency initiative for orthopedic surgery instrumentation at an academic center: A comparative before-and-after study
title_sort implementing a perioperative efficiency initiative for orthopedic surgery instrumentation at an academic center: a comparative before-and-after study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6407992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30762733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014338
work_keys_str_mv AT caprarichard implementingaperioperativeefficiencyinitiativefororthopedicsurgeryinstrumentationatanacademiccenteracomparativebeforeandafterstudy
AT binistefanoa implementingaperioperativeefficiencyinitiativefororthopedicsurgeryinstrumentationatanacademiccenteracomparativebeforeandafterstudy
AT bowdendawne implementingaperioperativeefficiencyinitiativefororthopedicsurgeryinstrumentationatanacademiccenteracomparativebeforeandafterstudy
AT etterkatherine implementingaperioperativeefficiencyinitiativefororthopedicsurgeryinstrumentationatanacademiccenteracomparativebeforeandafterstudy
AT callahanmatt implementingaperioperativeefficiencyinitiativefororthopedicsurgeryinstrumentationatanacademiccenteracomparativebeforeandafterstudy
AT smithrichardt implementingaperioperativeefficiencyinitiativefororthopedicsurgeryinstrumentationatanacademiccenteracomparativebeforeandafterstudy
AT vailthomasparker implementingaperioperativeefficiencyinitiativefororthopedicsurgeryinstrumentationatanacademiccenteracomparativebeforeandafterstudy