Cargando…
Understanding how, why, for whom, and under what circumstances opt-out blood-borne virus testing programmes work to increase test engagement and uptake within prison: a rapid-realist review
BACKGROUND: Prisons represent a unique opportunity to diagnose blood-borne viruses. Opt-out testing is receiving increasing interest, as a result of mounting evidence to suggest that the manner in which a test offer is delivered, affects test uptake. Although the effectiveness of opt-out testing wit...
Autores principales: | Francis-Graham, Seth, Ekeke, Nnenna Adaniya, Nelson, Corey Andrew, Lee, Tin Yan, Haj, Sulaima El, Rhodes, Tim, Vindrola, Cecilia, Colbourn, Tim, Rosenberg, William |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6408812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30849986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-3970-z |
Ejemplares similares
-
What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A realist review
por: Husk, Kerryn, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Internet-based medical education: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances
por: Wong, Geoff, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Comparing HIV Case Detection in Prison During Opt-In vs. Opt-Out Testing Policies
por: Rosen, David L., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
A realist review of shared medical appointments: How, for whom, and under what circumstances do they work?
por: Kirsh, Susan R., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A protocol for a realist review
por: Husk, Kerryn, et al.
Publicado: (2016)