Cargando…

Comparison of Echocardiographic and Electrocardiographic Mapping for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Optimisation

STUDY HYPOTHESIS: We sought to investigate the association between echocardiographic optimisation and ventricular activation time in cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) patients, obtained through the use of electrocardiographic mapping (ECM). We hypothesised that echocardiographic optimisation o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pereira, Helder, Jackson, Tom A., Claridge, Simon, Behar, Jonathan M., Yao, Cheng, Sieniewicz, Benjamin, Gould, Justin, Porter, Bradley, Sidhu, Baldeep, Gill, Jaswinder, Niederer, Steven, Rinaldi, Christopher A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6409049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30918721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4351693
_version_ 1783401905361256448
author Pereira, Helder
Jackson, Tom A.
Claridge, Simon
Behar, Jonathan M.
Yao, Cheng
Sieniewicz, Benjamin
Gould, Justin
Porter, Bradley
Sidhu, Baldeep
Gill, Jaswinder
Niederer, Steven
Rinaldi, Christopher A.
author_facet Pereira, Helder
Jackson, Tom A.
Claridge, Simon
Behar, Jonathan M.
Yao, Cheng
Sieniewicz, Benjamin
Gould, Justin
Porter, Bradley
Sidhu, Baldeep
Gill, Jaswinder
Niederer, Steven
Rinaldi, Christopher A.
author_sort Pereira, Helder
collection PubMed
description STUDY HYPOTHESIS: We sought to investigate the association between echocardiographic optimisation and ventricular activation time in cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) patients, obtained through the use of electrocardiographic mapping (ECM). We hypothesised that echocardiographic optimisation of the pacing delay between the atrial and ventricular leads—atrioventricular delay (AVD)—and the delay between ventricular leads—interventricular pacing interval (VVD)—would correlate with reductions in ventricular activation time. BACKGROUND: Optimisation of AVD and VVD may improve CRT patient outcome. Optimal delays are currently set based on echocardiographic indices; however, acute studies have found that reductions in bulk ventricular activation time correlate with improvements in acute haemodynamic performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with established CRT criteria were recruited. After implantation, patients underwent echo-guided optimisation of the AVD and VVD. During this procedure, the participants also underwent noninvasive ECM. ECM maps were constructed for each AVD and VVD. ECM maps were analysed offline. Total ventricular activation time (TVaT) and a ventricular activation time index (VaT(10-90)) were calculated to identify the optimal AVD and VVD timings that gave the minimal TVaT and VaT(10-90) values. We correlated cardiac output with these electrical timings. RESULTS: Echocardiographic programming optimisation was not associated with the greatest reductions in biventricular activation time (VaT(10-90) and TVaT). Instead, bulk activation times were reduced by a further 20% when optimised with ECM. A significant inverse correlation was identified between reductions in bulk ventricular activation time and improvements in LVOT VTI (p < 0.001), suggesting that improved ventricular haemodynamics are a sequelae of more rapid ventricular activation. CONCLUSIONS: EAM-guided programming optimisation may achieve superior fusion of activation wave fronts leading to improvements in CRT response.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6409049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64090492019-03-27 Comparison of Echocardiographic and Electrocardiographic Mapping for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Optimisation Pereira, Helder Jackson, Tom A. Claridge, Simon Behar, Jonathan M. Yao, Cheng Sieniewicz, Benjamin Gould, Justin Porter, Bradley Sidhu, Baldeep Gill, Jaswinder Niederer, Steven Rinaldi, Christopher A. Cardiol Res Pract Clinical Study STUDY HYPOTHESIS: We sought to investigate the association between echocardiographic optimisation and ventricular activation time in cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) patients, obtained through the use of electrocardiographic mapping (ECM). We hypothesised that echocardiographic optimisation of the pacing delay between the atrial and ventricular leads—atrioventricular delay (AVD)—and the delay between ventricular leads—interventricular pacing interval (VVD)—would correlate with reductions in ventricular activation time. BACKGROUND: Optimisation of AVD and VVD may improve CRT patient outcome. Optimal delays are currently set based on echocardiographic indices; however, acute studies have found that reductions in bulk ventricular activation time correlate with improvements in acute haemodynamic performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with established CRT criteria were recruited. After implantation, patients underwent echo-guided optimisation of the AVD and VVD. During this procedure, the participants also underwent noninvasive ECM. ECM maps were constructed for each AVD and VVD. ECM maps were analysed offline. Total ventricular activation time (TVaT) and a ventricular activation time index (VaT(10-90)) were calculated to identify the optimal AVD and VVD timings that gave the minimal TVaT and VaT(10-90) values. We correlated cardiac output with these electrical timings. RESULTS: Echocardiographic programming optimisation was not associated with the greatest reductions in biventricular activation time (VaT(10-90) and TVaT). Instead, bulk activation times were reduced by a further 20% when optimised with ECM. A significant inverse correlation was identified between reductions in bulk ventricular activation time and improvements in LVOT VTI (p < 0.001), suggesting that improved ventricular haemodynamics are a sequelae of more rapid ventricular activation. CONCLUSIONS: EAM-guided programming optimisation may achieve superior fusion of activation wave fronts leading to improvements in CRT response. Hindawi 2019-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6409049/ /pubmed/30918721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4351693 Text en Copyright © 2019 Helder Pereira et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Pereira, Helder
Jackson, Tom A.
Claridge, Simon
Behar, Jonathan M.
Yao, Cheng
Sieniewicz, Benjamin
Gould, Justin
Porter, Bradley
Sidhu, Baldeep
Gill, Jaswinder
Niederer, Steven
Rinaldi, Christopher A.
Comparison of Echocardiographic and Electrocardiographic Mapping for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Optimisation
title Comparison of Echocardiographic and Electrocardiographic Mapping for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Optimisation
title_full Comparison of Echocardiographic and Electrocardiographic Mapping for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Optimisation
title_fullStr Comparison of Echocardiographic and Electrocardiographic Mapping for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Optimisation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Echocardiographic and Electrocardiographic Mapping for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Optimisation
title_short Comparison of Echocardiographic and Electrocardiographic Mapping for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Optimisation
title_sort comparison of echocardiographic and electrocardiographic mapping for cardiac resynchronisation therapy optimisation
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6409049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30918721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4351693
work_keys_str_mv AT pereirahelder comparisonofechocardiographicandelectrocardiographicmappingforcardiacresynchronisationtherapyoptimisation
AT jacksontoma comparisonofechocardiographicandelectrocardiographicmappingforcardiacresynchronisationtherapyoptimisation
AT claridgesimon comparisonofechocardiographicandelectrocardiographicmappingforcardiacresynchronisationtherapyoptimisation
AT beharjonathanm comparisonofechocardiographicandelectrocardiographicmappingforcardiacresynchronisationtherapyoptimisation
AT yaocheng comparisonofechocardiographicandelectrocardiographicmappingforcardiacresynchronisationtherapyoptimisation
AT sieniewiczbenjamin comparisonofechocardiographicandelectrocardiographicmappingforcardiacresynchronisationtherapyoptimisation
AT gouldjustin comparisonofechocardiographicandelectrocardiographicmappingforcardiacresynchronisationtherapyoptimisation
AT porterbradley comparisonofechocardiographicandelectrocardiographicmappingforcardiacresynchronisationtherapyoptimisation
AT sidhubaldeep comparisonofechocardiographicandelectrocardiographicmappingforcardiacresynchronisationtherapyoptimisation
AT gilljaswinder comparisonofechocardiographicandelectrocardiographicmappingforcardiacresynchronisationtherapyoptimisation
AT niederersteven comparisonofechocardiographicandelectrocardiographicmappingforcardiacresynchronisationtherapyoptimisation
AT rinaldichristophera comparisonofechocardiographicandelectrocardiographicmappingforcardiacresynchronisationtherapyoptimisation