Cargando…

Dosimetry of Critical Organs in Maxillofacial Imaging with Cone-beam Computed Tomography

BACKGROUND: While the benefits of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) are well known in maxillofacial imaging, the use of this modality is not risk-free. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the exposure doses received by patients during maxillofacial imaging with CBCT. METHODS: Entranc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghanbarnezhad Farshi, R., Mesbahi, A., Johari, M., Kara, Ü., Gharehaghaji, N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6409370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881934
_version_ 1783401953462583296
author Ghanbarnezhad Farshi, R.
Mesbahi, A.
Johari, M.
Kara, Ü.
Gharehaghaji, N.
author_facet Ghanbarnezhad Farshi, R.
Mesbahi, A.
Johari, M.
Kara, Ü.
Gharehaghaji, N.
author_sort Ghanbarnezhad Farshi, R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While the benefits of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) are well known in maxillofacial imaging, the use of this modality is not risk-free. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the exposure doses received by patients during maxillofacial imaging with CBCT. METHODS: Entrance surface dose (ESD) was measured by using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) attached to the eyes lids, parotid glands and thyroid of 64 patients in two imaging centers (A and B). Phantom dosimetry was performed by a cylindrical poly-methyl methacrylate (PMMA) head-size phantom and an ionization chamber for different exposure parameters. NewTom VGi and Planmeca Promax 3D CBCT scanners were used at centers A and B, respectively. RESULTS: The mean ESD of the eyes, parotid glands and thyroid were 2.57, 2.33 and 0.28 mGy in center A, 0.35, 2.11 and 0.37 mGy in center B, respectively. ESD of the eyes revealed a significant difference in two centers; in center B, it was 86.4% lower than center A. In the phantom dosimetry, the measured doses of NewTom VGi were 2.63 and 2.08 mGy, respectively by changing field of view (FOV) size from 8×8 cm(2) (height × diameter) to 6×6 cm(2). For Planmeca Promax 3D, it ranged from 0.98 to 3.24 mGy depending on exposure parameters. CONCLUSION: There is a wide range of radiation doses dependent on the units, patients and selected scan parameters. Inappropriate selection of exposure settings, especially FOV size, can seriously increase patient dose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6409370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64093702019-03-16 Dosimetry of Critical Organs in Maxillofacial Imaging with Cone-beam Computed Tomography Ghanbarnezhad Farshi, R. Mesbahi, A. Johari, M. Kara, Ü. Gharehaghaji, N. J Biomed Phys Eng Original Article BACKGROUND: While the benefits of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) are well known in maxillofacial imaging, the use of this modality is not risk-free. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the exposure doses received by patients during maxillofacial imaging with CBCT. METHODS: Entrance surface dose (ESD) was measured by using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) attached to the eyes lids, parotid glands and thyroid of 64 patients in two imaging centers (A and B). Phantom dosimetry was performed by a cylindrical poly-methyl methacrylate (PMMA) head-size phantom and an ionization chamber for different exposure parameters. NewTom VGi and Planmeca Promax 3D CBCT scanners were used at centers A and B, respectively. RESULTS: The mean ESD of the eyes, parotid glands and thyroid were 2.57, 2.33 and 0.28 mGy in center A, 0.35, 2.11 and 0.37 mGy in center B, respectively. ESD of the eyes revealed a significant difference in two centers; in center B, it was 86.4% lower than center A. In the phantom dosimetry, the measured doses of NewTom VGi were 2.63 and 2.08 mGy, respectively by changing field of view (FOV) size from 8×8 cm(2) (height × diameter) to 6×6 cm(2). For Planmeca Promax 3D, it ranged from 0.98 to 3.24 mGy depending on exposure parameters. CONCLUSION: There is a wide range of radiation doses dependent on the units, patients and selected scan parameters. Inappropriate selection of exposure settings, especially FOV size, can seriously increase patient dose. Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering 2019-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6409370/ /pubmed/30881934 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ghanbarnezhad Farshi, R.
Mesbahi, A.
Johari, M.
Kara, Ü.
Gharehaghaji, N.
Dosimetry of Critical Organs in Maxillofacial Imaging with Cone-beam Computed Tomography
title Dosimetry of Critical Organs in Maxillofacial Imaging with Cone-beam Computed Tomography
title_full Dosimetry of Critical Organs in Maxillofacial Imaging with Cone-beam Computed Tomography
title_fullStr Dosimetry of Critical Organs in Maxillofacial Imaging with Cone-beam Computed Tomography
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetry of Critical Organs in Maxillofacial Imaging with Cone-beam Computed Tomography
title_short Dosimetry of Critical Organs in Maxillofacial Imaging with Cone-beam Computed Tomography
title_sort dosimetry of critical organs in maxillofacial imaging with cone-beam computed tomography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6409370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881934
work_keys_str_mv AT ghanbarnezhadfarshir dosimetryofcriticalorgansinmaxillofacialimagingwithconebeamcomputedtomography
AT mesbahia dosimetryofcriticalorgansinmaxillofacialimagingwithconebeamcomputedtomography
AT joharim dosimetryofcriticalorgansinmaxillofacialimagingwithconebeamcomputedtomography
AT karau dosimetryofcriticalorgansinmaxillofacialimagingwithconebeamcomputedtomography
AT gharehaghajin dosimetryofcriticalorgansinmaxillofacialimagingwithconebeamcomputedtomography