Cargando…
Dosimetry of Critical Organs in Maxillofacial Imaging with Cone-beam Computed Tomography
BACKGROUND: While the benefits of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) are well known in maxillofacial imaging, the use of this modality is not risk-free. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the exposure doses received by patients during maxillofacial imaging with CBCT. METHODS: Entranc...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6409370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881934 |
_version_ | 1783401953462583296 |
---|---|
author | Ghanbarnezhad Farshi, R. Mesbahi, A. Johari, M. Kara, Ü. Gharehaghaji, N. |
author_facet | Ghanbarnezhad Farshi, R. Mesbahi, A. Johari, M. Kara, Ü. Gharehaghaji, N. |
author_sort | Ghanbarnezhad Farshi, R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While the benefits of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) are well known in maxillofacial imaging, the use of this modality is not risk-free. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the exposure doses received by patients during maxillofacial imaging with CBCT. METHODS: Entrance surface dose (ESD) was measured by using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) attached to the eyes lids, parotid glands and thyroid of 64 patients in two imaging centers (A and B). Phantom dosimetry was performed by a cylindrical poly-methyl methacrylate (PMMA) head-size phantom and an ionization chamber for different exposure parameters. NewTom VGi and Planmeca Promax 3D CBCT scanners were used at centers A and B, respectively. RESULTS: The mean ESD of the eyes, parotid glands and thyroid were 2.57, 2.33 and 0.28 mGy in center A, 0.35, 2.11 and 0.37 mGy in center B, respectively. ESD of the eyes revealed a significant difference in two centers; in center B, it was 86.4% lower than center A. In the phantom dosimetry, the measured doses of NewTom VGi were 2.63 and 2.08 mGy, respectively by changing field of view (FOV) size from 8×8 cm(2) (height × diameter) to 6×6 cm(2). For Planmeca Promax 3D, it ranged from 0.98 to 3.24 mGy depending on exposure parameters. CONCLUSION: There is a wide range of radiation doses dependent on the units, patients and selected scan parameters. Inappropriate selection of exposure settings, especially FOV size, can seriously increase patient dose. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6409370 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64093702019-03-16 Dosimetry of Critical Organs in Maxillofacial Imaging with Cone-beam Computed Tomography Ghanbarnezhad Farshi, R. Mesbahi, A. Johari, M. Kara, Ü. Gharehaghaji, N. J Biomed Phys Eng Original Article BACKGROUND: While the benefits of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) are well known in maxillofacial imaging, the use of this modality is not risk-free. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the exposure doses received by patients during maxillofacial imaging with CBCT. METHODS: Entrance surface dose (ESD) was measured by using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) attached to the eyes lids, parotid glands and thyroid of 64 patients in two imaging centers (A and B). Phantom dosimetry was performed by a cylindrical poly-methyl methacrylate (PMMA) head-size phantom and an ionization chamber for different exposure parameters. NewTom VGi and Planmeca Promax 3D CBCT scanners were used at centers A and B, respectively. RESULTS: The mean ESD of the eyes, parotid glands and thyroid were 2.57, 2.33 and 0.28 mGy in center A, 0.35, 2.11 and 0.37 mGy in center B, respectively. ESD of the eyes revealed a significant difference in two centers; in center B, it was 86.4% lower than center A. In the phantom dosimetry, the measured doses of NewTom VGi were 2.63 and 2.08 mGy, respectively by changing field of view (FOV) size from 8×8 cm(2) (height × diameter) to 6×6 cm(2). For Planmeca Promax 3D, it ranged from 0.98 to 3.24 mGy depending on exposure parameters. CONCLUSION: There is a wide range of radiation doses dependent on the units, patients and selected scan parameters. Inappropriate selection of exposure settings, especially FOV size, can seriously increase patient dose. Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering 2019-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6409370/ /pubmed/30881934 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ghanbarnezhad Farshi, R. Mesbahi, A. Johari, M. Kara, Ü. Gharehaghaji, N. Dosimetry of Critical Organs in Maxillofacial Imaging with Cone-beam Computed Tomography |
title | Dosimetry of Critical Organs in Maxillofacial Imaging with Cone-beam Computed Tomography
|
title_full | Dosimetry of Critical Organs in Maxillofacial Imaging with Cone-beam Computed Tomography
|
title_fullStr | Dosimetry of Critical Organs in Maxillofacial Imaging with Cone-beam Computed Tomography
|
title_full_unstemmed | Dosimetry of Critical Organs in Maxillofacial Imaging with Cone-beam Computed Tomography
|
title_short | Dosimetry of Critical Organs in Maxillofacial Imaging with Cone-beam Computed Tomography
|
title_sort | dosimetry of critical organs in maxillofacial imaging with cone-beam computed tomography |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6409370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881934 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ghanbarnezhadfarshir dosimetryofcriticalorgansinmaxillofacialimagingwithconebeamcomputedtomography AT mesbahia dosimetryofcriticalorgansinmaxillofacialimagingwithconebeamcomputedtomography AT joharim dosimetryofcriticalorgansinmaxillofacialimagingwithconebeamcomputedtomography AT karau dosimetryofcriticalorgansinmaxillofacialimagingwithconebeamcomputedtomography AT gharehaghajin dosimetryofcriticalorgansinmaxillofacialimagingwithconebeamcomputedtomography |