Cargando…

Patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstructive surgery: A prospective cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: With advancements in and the evolution of the medical field, several methods and surgical techniques have been developed for breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Generally, we can categorize these strategies into two broad groups: autologous reconstruction and implant-based reconstruc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alshammari, Salem Mohammad, Aldossary, Mohammed Yousef, Almutairi, Khaled, Almulhim, Abdulaziz, Alkhazmari, Gousay, Alyaqout, Mohammed, Abrar, Hussain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6409383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30899456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2019.02.002
_version_ 1783401957211242496
author Alshammari, Salem Mohammad
Aldossary, Mohammed Yousef
Almutairi, Khaled
Almulhim, Abdulaziz
Alkhazmari, Gousay
Alyaqout, Mohammed
Abrar, Hussain
author_facet Alshammari, Salem Mohammad
Aldossary, Mohammed Yousef
Almutairi, Khaled
Almulhim, Abdulaziz
Alkhazmari, Gousay
Alyaqout, Mohammed
Abrar, Hussain
author_sort Alshammari, Salem Mohammad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With advancements in and the evolution of the medical field, several methods and surgical techniques have been developed for breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Generally, we can categorize these strategies into two broad groups: autologous reconstruction and implant-based reconstruction. This study aimed to analyze the satisfaction rate between these groups, considering age, timing of breast reconstruction, body mass index (BMI), major complications, and the need for radiotherapy or chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All the patients who underwent a mastectomy and subsequent breast reconstruction surgery at our institution between August 1, 2013, and August 31, 2017, were invited to complete a BREAST-Q questionnaire. To compare the quality of life and complication rate between the autologous and implant-based reconstruction groups, data were collected from specific patients. All participants completed the Arabic version of the postoperative reconstruction module. RESULTS: Among 61 patients, 43 (70.5%) completed the two domains of the BREAST-Q questionnaire, about the satisfaction with the implanted breast and satisfaction with the surgical outcome. These patients were divided into two groups: autologous (n = 21) and implant-based (n = 22) groups. The mean score of satisfaction with the implanted breast was 43.5 for the autologous group and 39.6 for the implant-based group. For the surgical outcome, the scores for the autologous and implant-based groups were 45.4 and 56.0, respectively. However, there was neither a statistical significance in the satisfaction with the implanted breast nor the surgical outcome between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Although there are many different surgical techniques to reconstruct a breast after mastectomy, there is still no specific surgical method that is perfect or well-suited for all patients undergoing breast reconstruction surgery. In our study, we found that there was no significant difference in satisfaction between the ABR and IBR group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6409383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64093832019-03-21 Patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstructive surgery: A prospective cross-sectional study Alshammari, Salem Mohammad Aldossary, Mohammed Yousef Almutairi, Khaled Almulhim, Abdulaziz Alkhazmari, Gousay Alyaqout, Mohammed Abrar, Hussain Ann Med Surg (Lond) Original Research BACKGROUND: With advancements in and the evolution of the medical field, several methods and surgical techniques have been developed for breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Generally, we can categorize these strategies into two broad groups: autologous reconstruction and implant-based reconstruction. This study aimed to analyze the satisfaction rate between these groups, considering age, timing of breast reconstruction, body mass index (BMI), major complications, and the need for radiotherapy or chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All the patients who underwent a mastectomy and subsequent breast reconstruction surgery at our institution between August 1, 2013, and August 31, 2017, were invited to complete a BREAST-Q questionnaire. To compare the quality of life and complication rate between the autologous and implant-based reconstruction groups, data were collected from specific patients. All participants completed the Arabic version of the postoperative reconstruction module. RESULTS: Among 61 patients, 43 (70.5%) completed the two domains of the BREAST-Q questionnaire, about the satisfaction with the implanted breast and satisfaction with the surgical outcome. These patients were divided into two groups: autologous (n = 21) and implant-based (n = 22) groups. The mean score of satisfaction with the implanted breast was 43.5 for the autologous group and 39.6 for the implant-based group. For the surgical outcome, the scores for the autologous and implant-based groups were 45.4 and 56.0, respectively. However, there was neither a statistical significance in the satisfaction with the implanted breast nor the surgical outcome between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Although there are many different surgical techniques to reconstruct a breast after mastectomy, there is still no specific surgical method that is perfect or well-suited for all patients undergoing breast reconstruction surgery. In our study, we found that there was no significant difference in satisfaction between the ABR and IBR group. Elsevier 2019-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6409383/ /pubmed/30899456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2019.02.002 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Alshammari, Salem Mohammad
Aldossary, Mohammed Yousef
Almutairi, Khaled
Almulhim, Abdulaziz
Alkhazmari, Gousay
Alyaqout, Mohammed
Abrar, Hussain
Patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstructive surgery: A prospective cross-sectional study
title Patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstructive surgery: A prospective cross-sectional study
title_full Patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstructive surgery: A prospective cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstructive surgery: A prospective cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstructive surgery: A prospective cross-sectional study
title_short Patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstructive surgery: A prospective cross-sectional study
title_sort patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstructive surgery: a prospective cross-sectional study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6409383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30899456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2019.02.002
work_keys_str_mv AT alshammarisalemmohammad patientreportedoutcomesafterbreastreconstructivesurgeryaprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT aldossarymohammedyousef patientreportedoutcomesafterbreastreconstructivesurgeryaprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT almutairikhaled patientreportedoutcomesafterbreastreconstructivesurgeryaprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT almulhimabdulaziz patientreportedoutcomesafterbreastreconstructivesurgeryaprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT alkhazmarigousay patientreportedoutcomesafterbreastreconstructivesurgeryaprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT alyaqoutmohammed patientreportedoutcomesafterbreastreconstructivesurgeryaprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT abrarhussain patientreportedoutcomesafterbreastreconstructivesurgeryaprospectivecrosssectionalstudy