Cargando…
Intestinal Permeation Enhancers for Oral Delivery of Macromolecules: A Comparison between Salcaprozate Sodium (SNAC) and Sodium Caprate (C(10))
Salcaprozate sodium (SNAC) and sodium caprate (C(10)) are two of the most advanced intestinal permeation enhancers (PEs) that have been tested in clinical trials for oral delivery of macromolecules. Their effects on intestinal epithelia were studied for over 30 years, yet there is still debate over...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6410172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30781867 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics11020078 |
_version_ | 1783402179056369664 |
---|---|
author | Twarog, Caroline Fattah, Sarinj Heade, Joanne Maher, Sam Fattal, Elias Brayden, David J. |
author_facet | Twarog, Caroline Fattah, Sarinj Heade, Joanne Maher, Sam Fattal, Elias Brayden, David J. |
author_sort | Twarog, Caroline |
collection | PubMed |
description | Salcaprozate sodium (SNAC) and sodium caprate (C(10)) are two of the most advanced intestinal permeation enhancers (PEs) that have been tested in clinical trials for oral delivery of macromolecules. Their effects on intestinal epithelia were studied for over 30 years, yet there is still debate over their mechanisms of action. C(10) acts via openings of epithelial tight junctions and/or membrane perturbation, while for decades SNAC was thought to increase passive transcellular permeation across small intestinal epithelia based on increased lipophilicity arising from non-covalent macromolecule complexation. More recently, an additional mechanism for SNAC associated with a pH-elevating, monomer-inducing, and pepsin-inhibiting effect in the stomach for oral delivery of semaglutide was advocated. Comparing the two surfactants, we found equivocal evidence for discrete mechanisms at the level of epithelial interactions in the small intestine, especially at the high doses used in vivo. Evidence that one agent is more efficacious compared to the other is not convincing, with tablets containing these PEs inducing single-digit highly variable increases in oral bioavailability of payloads in human trials, although this may be adequate for potent macromolecules. Regarding safety, SNAC has generally regarded as safe (GRAS) status and is Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved as a medical food (Eligen(®)-Vitamin B(12), Emisphere, Roseland, NJ, USA), whereas C(10) has a long history of use in man, and has food additive status. Evidence for co-absorption of microorganisms in the presence of either SNAC or C(10) has not emerged from clinical trials to date, and long-term effects from repeat dosing beyond six months have yet to be assessed. Since there are no obvious scientific reasons to prefer SNAC over C(10) in orally delivering a poorly permeable macromolecule, then formulation, manufacturing, and commercial considerations are the key drivers in decision-making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6410172 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64101722019-03-29 Intestinal Permeation Enhancers for Oral Delivery of Macromolecules: A Comparison between Salcaprozate Sodium (SNAC) and Sodium Caprate (C(10)) Twarog, Caroline Fattah, Sarinj Heade, Joanne Maher, Sam Fattal, Elias Brayden, David J. Pharmaceutics Review Salcaprozate sodium (SNAC) and sodium caprate (C(10)) are two of the most advanced intestinal permeation enhancers (PEs) that have been tested in clinical trials for oral delivery of macromolecules. Their effects on intestinal epithelia were studied for over 30 years, yet there is still debate over their mechanisms of action. C(10) acts via openings of epithelial tight junctions and/or membrane perturbation, while for decades SNAC was thought to increase passive transcellular permeation across small intestinal epithelia based on increased lipophilicity arising from non-covalent macromolecule complexation. More recently, an additional mechanism for SNAC associated with a pH-elevating, monomer-inducing, and pepsin-inhibiting effect in the stomach for oral delivery of semaglutide was advocated. Comparing the two surfactants, we found equivocal evidence for discrete mechanisms at the level of epithelial interactions in the small intestine, especially at the high doses used in vivo. Evidence that one agent is more efficacious compared to the other is not convincing, with tablets containing these PEs inducing single-digit highly variable increases in oral bioavailability of payloads in human trials, although this may be adequate for potent macromolecules. Regarding safety, SNAC has generally regarded as safe (GRAS) status and is Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved as a medical food (Eligen(®)-Vitamin B(12), Emisphere, Roseland, NJ, USA), whereas C(10) has a long history of use in man, and has food additive status. Evidence for co-absorption of microorganisms in the presence of either SNAC or C(10) has not emerged from clinical trials to date, and long-term effects from repeat dosing beyond six months have yet to be assessed. Since there are no obvious scientific reasons to prefer SNAC over C(10) in orally delivering a poorly permeable macromolecule, then formulation, manufacturing, and commercial considerations are the key drivers in decision-making. MDPI 2019-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6410172/ /pubmed/30781867 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics11020078 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Twarog, Caroline Fattah, Sarinj Heade, Joanne Maher, Sam Fattal, Elias Brayden, David J. Intestinal Permeation Enhancers for Oral Delivery of Macromolecules: A Comparison between Salcaprozate Sodium (SNAC) and Sodium Caprate (C(10)) |
title | Intestinal Permeation Enhancers for Oral Delivery of Macromolecules: A Comparison between Salcaprozate Sodium (SNAC) and Sodium Caprate (C(10)) |
title_full | Intestinal Permeation Enhancers for Oral Delivery of Macromolecules: A Comparison between Salcaprozate Sodium (SNAC) and Sodium Caprate (C(10)) |
title_fullStr | Intestinal Permeation Enhancers for Oral Delivery of Macromolecules: A Comparison between Salcaprozate Sodium (SNAC) and Sodium Caprate (C(10)) |
title_full_unstemmed | Intestinal Permeation Enhancers for Oral Delivery of Macromolecules: A Comparison between Salcaprozate Sodium (SNAC) and Sodium Caprate (C(10)) |
title_short | Intestinal Permeation Enhancers for Oral Delivery of Macromolecules: A Comparison between Salcaprozate Sodium (SNAC) and Sodium Caprate (C(10)) |
title_sort | intestinal permeation enhancers for oral delivery of macromolecules: a comparison between salcaprozate sodium (snac) and sodium caprate (c(10)) |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6410172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30781867 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics11020078 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT twarogcaroline intestinalpermeationenhancersfororaldeliveryofmacromoleculesacomparisonbetweensalcaprozatesodiumsnacandsodiumcapratec10 AT fattahsarinj intestinalpermeationenhancersfororaldeliveryofmacromoleculesacomparisonbetweensalcaprozatesodiumsnacandsodiumcapratec10 AT headejoanne intestinalpermeationenhancersfororaldeliveryofmacromoleculesacomparisonbetweensalcaprozatesodiumsnacandsodiumcapratec10 AT mahersam intestinalpermeationenhancersfororaldeliveryofmacromoleculesacomparisonbetweensalcaprozatesodiumsnacandsodiumcapratec10 AT fattalelias intestinalpermeationenhancersfororaldeliveryofmacromoleculesacomparisonbetweensalcaprozatesodiumsnacandsodiumcapratec10 AT braydendavidj intestinalpermeationenhancersfororaldeliveryofmacromoleculesacomparisonbetweensalcaprozatesodiumsnacandsodiumcapratec10 |