Cargando…

Consent2Share: an integrated broad consenting process for re-contacting potential study subjects

Background and Aim: Obtaining sufficient subjects into research studies is an ongoing barrier to conducting clinical research. Privacy rules add to the complexity of identifying qualified study subjects. The process described facilitates consent of patients coming to their clinically scheduled appoi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iafrate, R Peter, Lipori, Gloria P, Harle, Christopher A, Nelson, David R, Barnash, Timothy J, Leebove, Patricia T, Adams, Kathleen A, Montgomery, Debbi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6410634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30873469
_version_ 1783402285412384768
author Iafrate, R Peter
Lipori, Gloria P
Harle, Christopher A
Nelson, David R
Barnash, Timothy J
Leebove, Patricia T
Adams, Kathleen A
Montgomery, Debbi
author_facet Iafrate, R Peter
Lipori, Gloria P
Harle, Christopher A
Nelson, David R
Barnash, Timothy J
Leebove, Patricia T
Adams, Kathleen A
Montgomery, Debbi
author_sort Iafrate, R Peter
collection PubMed
description Background and Aim: Obtaining sufficient subjects into research studies is an ongoing barrier to conducting clinical research. Privacy rules add to the complexity of identifying qualified study subjects. The process described facilitates consent of patients coming to their clinically scheduled appointments who are asked to consent to having researchers review their electronic medical records (EHR), and if they meet study criteria for future research, being contacted by those researchers and asked if they wish to be involved in a research project. Methods: An interdisciplinary group representing the Institutional Review Board (IRB), Information Technology (IT), Hospital, University and Research developed an initial paper then electronic method to consent all patients attending a medical subspecialty clinic. All consent data are integrated to the EHR to facilitate linking to clinical information. Results: Although the paper consenting method resulted in over an 80% “yes” rate of consent, it was complicated by significant procedural challenges which prevented scalability. Revising the process has resulted in nearly 28,000 patients consenting in a 3 year period and in 20 IRB approved protocols using subjects who agreed to Consent2Share. Conclusions: A multi-disciplinary effort is essential to develop a successful electronic based, integrated process to assist investigators and patients to facilitate study subject accrual. Relevance for patients: Consent2Share more efficiently assists researchers in identifying and contacting potential study subjects that meet entrance criteria. The process provides a model to comply with the proposed Notice of Public Rule Making (NPRM) where institutions will be strongly encouraged to develop broad research consent procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6410634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64106342019-03-14 Consent2Share: an integrated broad consenting process for re-contacting potential study subjects Iafrate, R Peter Lipori, Gloria P Harle, Christopher A Nelson, David R Barnash, Timothy J Leebove, Patricia T Adams, Kathleen A Montgomery, Debbi J Clin Transl Res Original Article Background and Aim: Obtaining sufficient subjects into research studies is an ongoing barrier to conducting clinical research. Privacy rules add to the complexity of identifying qualified study subjects. The process described facilitates consent of patients coming to their clinically scheduled appointments who are asked to consent to having researchers review their electronic medical records (EHR), and if they meet study criteria for future research, being contacted by those researchers and asked if they wish to be involved in a research project. Methods: An interdisciplinary group representing the Institutional Review Board (IRB), Information Technology (IT), Hospital, University and Research developed an initial paper then electronic method to consent all patients attending a medical subspecialty clinic. All consent data are integrated to the EHR to facilitate linking to clinical information. Results: Although the paper consenting method resulted in over an 80% “yes” rate of consent, it was complicated by significant procedural challenges which prevented scalability. Revising the process has resulted in nearly 28,000 patients consenting in a 3 year period and in 20 IRB approved protocols using subjects who agreed to Consent2Share. Conclusions: A multi-disciplinary effort is essential to develop a successful electronic based, integrated process to assist investigators and patients to facilitate study subject accrual. Relevance for patients: Consent2Share more efficiently assists researchers in identifying and contacting potential study subjects that meet entrance criteria. The process provides a model to comply with the proposed Notice of Public Rule Making (NPRM) where institutions will be strongly encouraged to develop broad research consent procedures. Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. 2016-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6410634/ /pubmed/30873469 Text en Copyright © 2016, Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Iafrate, R Peter
Lipori, Gloria P
Harle, Christopher A
Nelson, David R
Barnash, Timothy J
Leebove, Patricia T
Adams, Kathleen A
Montgomery, Debbi
Consent2Share: an integrated broad consenting process for re-contacting potential study subjects
title Consent2Share: an integrated broad consenting process for re-contacting potential study subjects
title_full Consent2Share: an integrated broad consenting process for re-contacting potential study subjects
title_fullStr Consent2Share: an integrated broad consenting process for re-contacting potential study subjects
title_full_unstemmed Consent2Share: an integrated broad consenting process for re-contacting potential study subjects
title_short Consent2Share: an integrated broad consenting process for re-contacting potential study subjects
title_sort consent2share: an integrated broad consenting process for re-contacting potential study subjects
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6410634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30873469
work_keys_str_mv AT iafraterpeter consent2shareanintegratedbroadconsentingprocessforrecontactingpotentialstudysubjects
AT liporigloriap consent2shareanintegratedbroadconsentingprocessforrecontactingpotentialstudysubjects
AT harlechristophera consent2shareanintegratedbroadconsentingprocessforrecontactingpotentialstudysubjects
AT nelsondavidr consent2shareanintegratedbroadconsentingprocessforrecontactingpotentialstudysubjects
AT barnashtimothyj consent2shareanintegratedbroadconsentingprocessforrecontactingpotentialstudysubjects
AT leebovepatriciat consent2shareanintegratedbroadconsentingprocessforrecontactingpotentialstudysubjects
AT adamskathleena consent2shareanintegratedbroadconsentingprocessforrecontactingpotentialstudysubjects
AT montgomerydebbi consent2shareanintegratedbroadconsentingprocessforrecontactingpotentialstudysubjects