Cargando…
Consent2Share: an integrated broad consenting process for re-contacting potential study subjects
Background and Aim: Obtaining sufficient subjects into research studies is an ongoing barrier to conducting clinical research. Privacy rules add to the complexity of identifying qualified study subjects. The process described facilitates consent of patients coming to their clinically scheduled appoi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6410634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30873469 |
_version_ | 1783402285412384768 |
---|---|
author | Iafrate, R Peter Lipori, Gloria P Harle, Christopher A Nelson, David R Barnash, Timothy J Leebove, Patricia T Adams, Kathleen A Montgomery, Debbi |
author_facet | Iafrate, R Peter Lipori, Gloria P Harle, Christopher A Nelson, David R Barnash, Timothy J Leebove, Patricia T Adams, Kathleen A Montgomery, Debbi |
author_sort | Iafrate, R Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Aim: Obtaining sufficient subjects into research studies is an ongoing barrier to conducting clinical research. Privacy rules add to the complexity of identifying qualified study subjects. The process described facilitates consent of patients coming to their clinically scheduled appointments who are asked to consent to having researchers review their electronic medical records (EHR), and if they meet study criteria for future research, being contacted by those researchers and asked if they wish to be involved in a research project. Methods: An interdisciplinary group representing the Institutional Review Board (IRB), Information Technology (IT), Hospital, University and Research developed an initial paper then electronic method to consent all patients attending a medical subspecialty clinic. All consent data are integrated to the EHR to facilitate linking to clinical information. Results: Although the paper consenting method resulted in over an 80% “yes” rate of consent, it was complicated by significant procedural challenges which prevented scalability. Revising the process has resulted in nearly 28,000 patients consenting in a 3 year period and in 20 IRB approved protocols using subjects who agreed to Consent2Share. Conclusions: A multi-disciplinary effort is essential to develop a successful electronic based, integrated process to assist investigators and patients to facilitate study subject accrual. Relevance for patients: Consent2Share more efficiently assists researchers in identifying and contacting potential study subjects that meet entrance criteria. The process provides a model to comply with the proposed Notice of Public Rule Making (NPRM) where institutions will be strongly encouraged to develop broad research consent procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6410634 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64106342019-03-14 Consent2Share: an integrated broad consenting process for re-contacting potential study subjects Iafrate, R Peter Lipori, Gloria P Harle, Christopher A Nelson, David R Barnash, Timothy J Leebove, Patricia T Adams, Kathleen A Montgomery, Debbi J Clin Transl Res Original Article Background and Aim: Obtaining sufficient subjects into research studies is an ongoing barrier to conducting clinical research. Privacy rules add to the complexity of identifying qualified study subjects. The process described facilitates consent of patients coming to their clinically scheduled appointments who are asked to consent to having researchers review their electronic medical records (EHR), and if they meet study criteria for future research, being contacted by those researchers and asked if they wish to be involved in a research project. Methods: An interdisciplinary group representing the Institutional Review Board (IRB), Information Technology (IT), Hospital, University and Research developed an initial paper then electronic method to consent all patients attending a medical subspecialty clinic. All consent data are integrated to the EHR to facilitate linking to clinical information. Results: Although the paper consenting method resulted in over an 80% “yes” rate of consent, it was complicated by significant procedural challenges which prevented scalability. Revising the process has resulted in nearly 28,000 patients consenting in a 3 year period and in 20 IRB approved protocols using subjects who agreed to Consent2Share. Conclusions: A multi-disciplinary effort is essential to develop a successful electronic based, integrated process to assist investigators and patients to facilitate study subject accrual. Relevance for patients: Consent2Share more efficiently assists researchers in identifying and contacting potential study subjects that meet entrance criteria. The process provides a model to comply with the proposed Notice of Public Rule Making (NPRM) where institutions will be strongly encouraged to develop broad research consent procedures. Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. 2016-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6410634/ /pubmed/30873469 Text en Copyright © 2016, Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Iafrate, R Peter Lipori, Gloria P Harle, Christopher A Nelson, David R Barnash, Timothy J Leebove, Patricia T Adams, Kathleen A Montgomery, Debbi Consent2Share: an integrated broad consenting process for re-contacting potential study subjects |
title | Consent2Share: an integrated broad consenting process for re-contacting potential study subjects |
title_full | Consent2Share: an integrated broad consenting process for re-contacting potential study subjects |
title_fullStr | Consent2Share: an integrated broad consenting process for re-contacting potential study subjects |
title_full_unstemmed | Consent2Share: an integrated broad consenting process for re-contacting potential study subjects |
title_short | Consent2Share: an integrated broad consenting process for re-contacting potential study subjects |
title_sort | consent2share: an integrated broad consenting process for re-contacting potential study subjects |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6410634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30873469 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iafraterpeter consent2shareanintegratedbroadconsentingprocessforrecontactingpotentialstudysubjects AT liporigloriap consent2shareanintegratedbroadconsentingprocessforrecontactingpotentialstudysubjects AT harlechristophera consent2shareanintegratedbroadconsentingprocessforrecontactingpotentialstudysubjects AT nelsondavidr consent2shareanintegratedbroadconsentingprocessforrecontactingpotentialstudysubjects AT barnashtimothyj consent2shareanintegratedbroadconsentingprocessforrecontactingpotentialstudysubjects AT leebovepatriciat consent2shareanintegratedbroadconsentingprocessforrecontactingpotentialstudysubjects AT adamskathleena consent2shareanintegratedbroadconsentingprocessforrecontactingpotentialstudysubjects AT montgomerydebbi consent2shareanintegratedbroadconsentingprocessforrecontactingpotentialstudysubjects |