Cargando…

Is the PrePex device an alternative for surgical male circumcision in adolescents ages 13–17 years? Findings from routine service delivery during active surveillance in Zimbabwe

BACKGROUND: Male circumcision devices have the potential to accelerate adolescent voluntary medical male circumcision roll-out. Here, we present findings on safety, acceptability and satisfaction from active surveillance of PrePex implementation among 618 adolescent males (13–17 years) circumcised i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mavhu, Webster, Hatzold, Karin, Madidi, Ngonidzashe, Maponga, Brian, Dhlamini, Roy, Munjoma, Malvern, Xaba, Sinokuthemba, Ncube, Getrude, Mugurungi, Owen, Cowan, Frances M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6411138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30856228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213399
_version_ 1783402346261250048
author Mavhu, Webster
Hatzold, Karin
Madidi, Ngonidzashe
Maponga, Brian
Dhlamini, Roy
Munjoma, Malvern
Xaba, Sinokuthemba
Ncube, Getrude
Mugurungi, Owen
Cowan, Frances M.
author_facet Mavhu, Webster
Hatzold, Karin
Madidi, Ngonidzashe
Maponga, Brian
Dhlamini, Roy
Munjoma, Malvern
Xaba, Sinokuthemba
Ncube, Getrude
Mugurungi, Owen
Cowan, Frances M.
author_sort Mavhu, Webster
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Male circumcision devices have the potential to accelerate adolescent voluntary medical male circumcision roll-out. Here, we present findings on safety, acceptability and satisfaction from active surveillance of PrePex implementation among 618 adolescent males (13–17 years) circumcised in Zimbabwe. METHODS: The first 618 adolescents consecutively circumcised from October 2015 to October 2016 using PrePex during routine service delivery were actively followed up. Outcome measures included PrePex uptake, attendance for post-circumcision visits and adverse events (AEs). A survey was conducted amongst 500 consecutive active surveillance clients to assess acceptability and satisfaction with PrePex. RESULTS: A total of 1,811 adolescent males were circumcised across the three PrePex active surveillance sites. Of these, 870 (48%) opted for PrePex but only 618/870 (71%) were eligible. Among the 618, two (0.3%) self-removals requiring surgery (severe AEs), were observed. Four (0.6%) removals by providers (moderate AEs) did not require surgery. Another 6 (1%) mild AEs were due to: bleeding (n = 2), swelling (n = 2), and infection (n = 2). All AEs resolved without sequelae. Adherence to follow-up appointments was high (97.7% attended 7 day visit). A high proportion (71.6%) of survey respondents said they heard about PrePex from a mobilizer; 49.8% said they chose PrePex because they wanted to avoid the pain associated with the surgical procedure/surgery on their penis. Acceptability and satisfaction with PrePex was high; 95.4% indicated willingness to recommend PrePex to peers. A majority (92%) reported experiencing pain when PrePex was being removed. CONCLUSIONS: Active surveillance of the first 618 adolescent males circumcised using PrePex suggests that the device is both safe and acceptable when used in routine service delivery among 13–17 year-olds. There is need to intensify specific demand generation activities for PrePex male circumcision among this group of males.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6411138
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64111382019-04-01 Is the PrePex device an alternative for surgical male circumcision in adolescents ages 13–17 years? Findings from routine service delivery during active surveillance in Zimbabwe Mavhu, Webster Hatzold, Karin Madidi, Ngonidzashe Maponga, Brian Dhlamini, Roy Munjoma, Malvern Xaba, Sinokuthemba Ncube, Getrude Mugurungi, Owen Cowan, Frances M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Male circumcision devices have the potential to accelerate adolescent voluntary medical male circumcision roll-out. Here, we present findings on safety, acceptability and satisfaction from active surveillance of PrePex implementation among 618 adolescent males (13–17 years) circumcised in Zimbabwe. METHODS: The first 618 adolescents consecutively circumcised from October 2015 to October 2016 using PrePex during routine service delivery were actively followed up. Outcome measures included PrePex uptake, attendance for post-circumcision visits and adverse events (AEs). A survey was conducted amongst 500 consecutive active surveillance clients to assess acceptability and satisfaction with PrePex. RESULTS: A total of 1,811 adolescent males were circumcised across the three PrePex active surveillance sites. Of these, 870 (48%) opted for PrePex but only 618/870 (71%) were eligible. Among the 618, two (0.3%) self-removals requiring surgery (severe AEs), were observed. Four (0.6%) removals by providers (moderate AEs) did not require surgery. Another 6 (1%) mild AEs were due to: bleeding (n = 2), swelling (n = 2), and infection (n = 2). All AEs resolved without sequelae. Adherence to follow-up appointments was high (97.7% attended 7 day visit). A high proportion (71.6%) of survey respondents said they heard about PrePex from a mobilizer; 49.8% said they chose PrePex because they wanted to avoid the pain associated with the surgical procedure/surgery on their penis. Acceptability and satisfaction with PrePex was high; 95.4% indicated willingness to recommend PrePex to peers. A majority (92%) reported experiencing pain when PrePex was being removed. CONCLUSIONS: Active surveillance of the first 618 adolescent males circumcised using PrePex suggests that the device is both safe and acceptable when used in routine service delivery among 13–17 year-olds. There is need to intensify specific demand generation activities for PrePex male circumcision among this group of males. Public Library of Science 2019-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6411138/ /pubmed/30856228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213399 Text en © 2019 Mavhu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mavhu, Webster
Hatzold, Karin
Madidi, Ngonidzashe
Maponga, Brian
Dhlamini, Roy
Munjoma, Malvern
Xaba, Sinokuthemba
Ncube, Getrude
Mugurungi, Owen
Cowan, Frances M.
Is the PrePex device an alternative for surgical male circumcision in adolescents ages 13–17 years? Findings from routine service delivery during active surveillance in Zimbabwe
title Is the PrePex device an alternative for surgical male circumcision in adolescents ages 13–17 years? Findings from routine service delivery during active surveillance in Zimbabwe
title_full Is the PrePex device an alternative for surgical male circumcision in adolescents ages 13–17 years? Findings from routine service delivery during active surveillance in Zimbabwe
title_fullStr Is the PrePex device an alternative for surgical male circumcision in adolescents ages 13–17 years? Findings from routine service delivery during active surveillance in Zimbabwe
title_full_unstemmed Is the PrePex device an alternative for surgical male circumcision in adolescents ages 13–17 years? Findings from routine service delivery during active surveillance in Zimbabwe
title_short Is the PrePex device an alternative for surgical male circumcision in adolescents ages 13–17 years? Findings from routine service delivery during active surveillance in Zimbabwe
title_sort is the prepex device an alternative for surgical male circumcision in adolescents ages 13–17 years? findings from routine service delivery during active surveillance in zimbabwe
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6411138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30856228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213399
work_keys_str_mv AT mavhuwebster istheprepexdeviceanalternativeforsurgicalmalecircumcisioninadolescentsages1317yearsfindingsfromroutineservicedeliveryduringactivesurveillanceinzimbabwe
AT hatzoldkarin istheprepexdeviceanalternativeforsurgicalmalecircumcisioninadolescentsages1317yearsfindingsfromroutineservicedeliveryduringactivesurveillanceinzimbabwe
AT madidingonidzashe istheprepexdeviceanalternativeforsurgicalmalecircumcisioninadolescentsages1317yearsfindingsfromroutineservicedeliveryduringactivesurveillanceinzimbabwe
AT mapongabrian istheprepexdeviceanalternativeforsurgicalmalecircumcisioninadolescentsages1317yearsfindingsfromroutineservicedeliveryduringactivesurveillanceinzimbabwe
AT dhlaminiroy istheprepexdeviceanalternativeforsurgicalmalecircumcisioninadolescentsages1317yearsfindingsfromroutineservicedeliveryduringactivesurveillanceinzimbabwe
AT munjomamalvern istheprepexdeviceanalternativeforsurgicalmalecircumcisioninadolescentsages1317yearsfindingsfromroutineservicedeliveryduringactivesurveillanceinzimbabwe
AT xabasinokuthemba istheprepexdeviceanalternativeforsurgicalmalecircumcisioninadolescentsages1317yearsfindingsfromroutineservicedeliveryduringactivesurveillanceinzimbabwe
AT ncubegetrude istheprepexdeviceanalternativeforsurgicalmalecircumcisioninadolescentsages1317yearsfindingsfromroutineservicedeliveryduringactivesurveillanceinzimbabwe
AT mugurungiowen istheprepexdeviceanalternativeforsurgicalmalecircumcisioninadolescentsages1317yearsfindingsfromroutineservicedeliveryduringactivesurveillanceinzimbabwe
AT cowanfrancesm istheprepexdeviceanalternativeforsurgicalmalecircumcisioninadolescentsages1317yearsfindingsfromroutineservicedeliveryduringactivesurveillanceinzimbabwe