Cargando…

The importance of extracellular vesicle purification for downstream analysis: A comparison of differential centrifugation and size exclusion chromatography for helminth pathogens

BACKGROUND: Robust protocols for the isolation of extracellular vesicles (EVs) from the rest of their excretory-secretory products are necessary for downstream studies and application development. The most widely used purification method of EVs for helminth pathogens is currently differential centri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davis, Chelsea N., Phillips, Helen, Tomes, John J., Swain, Martin T., Wilkinson, Toby J., Brophy, Peter M., Morphew, Russell M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6411213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30811394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007191
_version_ 1783402357241937920
author Davis, Chelsea N.
Phillips, Helen
Tomes, John J.
Swain, Martin T.
Wilkinson, Toby J.
Brophy, Peter M.
Morphew, Russell M.
author_facet Davis, Chelsea N.
Phillips, Helen
Tomes, John J.
Swain, Martin T.
Wilkinson, Toby J.
Brophy, Peter M.
Morphew, Russell M.
author_sort Davis, Chelsea N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Robust protocols for the isolation of extracellular vesicles (EVs) from the rest of their excretory-secretory products are necessary for downstream studies and application development. The most widely used purification method of EVs for helminth pathogens is currently differential centrifugation (DC). In contrast, size exclusion chromatography (SEC) has been included in the purification pipeline for EVs from other pathogens, highlighting there is not an agreed research community ‘gold standard’ for EV isolation. In this case study, Fasciola hepatica from natural populations were cultured in order to collect EVs from culture media and evaluate a SEC or DC approach to pathogen helminth EV purification. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Transmission electron and atomic force microscopy demonstrated that EVs prepared by SEC were both smaller in size and less diverse than EV resolved by DC. Protein quantification and Western blotting further demonstrated that SEC purification realised a higher EV purity to free excretory-secretory protein (ESP) yield ratio compared to DC approaches as evident by the reduction of soluble free cathepsin L proteases in SEC EV preparations. Proteomic analysis further highlighted DC contamination from ESP as shown by an increased diversity of protein identifications and unique peptide hits in DC EVs as compared to SEC EVs. In addition, SEC purified EVs contained less tegumental based proteins than DC purified EVs. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The data suggests that DC and SEC purification methods do not isolate equivalent EV population profiles and caution should be taken in the choice of EV purification utilised, with certain protocols for DC preparations including more free ES proteins and tegumental artefacts. We propose that SEC methods should be used for EV purification prior to downstream studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6411213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64112132019-04-02 The importance of extracellular vesicle purification for downstream analysis: A comparison of differential centrifugation and size exclusion chromatography for helminth pathogens Davis, Chelsea N. Phillips, Helen Tomes, John J. Swain, Martin T. Wilkinson, Toby J. Brophy, Peter M. Morphew, Russell M. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Robust protocols for the isolation of extracellular vesicles (EVs) from the rest of their excretory-secretory products are necessary for downstream studies and application development. The most widely used purification method of EVs for helminth pathogens is currently differential centrifugation (DC). In contrast, size exclusion chromatography (SEC) has been included in the purification pipeline for EVs from other pathogens, highlighting there is not an agreed research community ‘gold standard’ for EV isolation. In this case study, Fasciola hepatica from natural populations were cultured in order to collect EVs from culture media and evaluate a SEC or DC approach to pathogen helminth EV purification. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Transmission electron and atomic force microscopy demonstrated that EVs prepared by SEC were both smaller in size and less diverse than EV resolved by DC. Protein quantification and Western blotting further demonstrated that SEC purification realised a higher EV purity to free excretory-secretory protein (ESP) yield ratio compared to DC approaches as evident by the reduction of soluble free cathepsin L proteases in SEC EV preparations. Proteomic analysis further highlighted DC contamination from ESP as shown by an increased diversity of protein identifications and unique peptide hits in DC EVs as compared to SEC EVs. In addition, SEC purified EVs contained less tegumental based proteins than DC purified EVs. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The data suggests that DC and SEC purification methods do not isolate equivalent EV population profiles and caution should be taken in the choice of EV purification utilised, with certain protocols for DC preparations including more free ES proteins and tegumental artefacts. We propose that SEC methods should be used for EV purification prior to downstream studies. Public Library of Science 2019-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6411213/ /pubmed/30811394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007191 Text en © 2019 Davis et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Davis, Chelsea N.
Phillips, Helen
Tomes, John J.
Swain, Martin T.
Wilkinson, Toby J.
Brophy, Peter M.
Morphew, Russell M.
The importance of extracellular vesicle purification for downstream analysis: A comparison of differential centrifugation and size exclusion chromatography for helminth pathogens
title The importance of extracellular vesicle purification for downstream analysis: A comparison of differential centrifugation and size exclusion chromatography for helminth pathogens
title_full The importance of extracellular vesicle purification for downstream analysis: A comparison of differential centrifugation and size exclusion chromatography for helminth pathogens
title_fullStr The importance of extracellular vesicle purification for downstream analysis: A comparison of differential centrifugation and size exclusion chromatography for helminth pathogens
title_full_unstemmed The importance of extracellular vesicle purification for downstream analysis: A comparison of differential centrifugation and size exclusion chromatography for helminth pathogens
title_short The importance of extracellular vesicle purification for downstream analysis: A comparison of differential centrifugation and size exclusion chromatography for helminth pathogens
title_sort importance of extracellular vesicle purification for downstream analysis: a comparison of differential centrifugation and size exclusion chromatography for helminth pathogens
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6411213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30811394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007191
work_keys_str_mv AT davischelsean theimportanceofextracellularvesiclepurificationfordownstreamanalysisacomparisonofdifferentialcentrifugationandsizeexclusionchromatographyforhelminthpathogens
AT phillipshelen theimportanceofextracellularvesiclepurificationfordownstreamanalysisacomparisonofdifferentialcentrifugationandsizeexclusionchromatographyforhelminthpathogens
AT tomesjohnj theimportanceofextracellularvesiclepurificationfordownstreamanalysisacomparisonofdifferentialcentrifugationandsizeexclusionchromatographyforhelminthpathogens
AT swainmartint theimportanceofextracellularvesiclepurificationfordownstreamanalysisacomparisonofdifferentialcentrifugationandsizeexclusionchromatographyforhelminthpathogens
AT wilkinsontobyj theimportanceofextracellularvesiclepurificationfordownstreamanalysisacomparisonofdifferentialcentrifugationandsizeexclusionchromatographyforhelminthpathogens
AT brophypeterm theimportanceofextracellularvesiclepurificationfordownstreamanalysisacomparisonofdifferentialcentrifugationandsizeexclusionchromatographyforhelminthpathogens
AT morphewrussellm theimportanceofextracellularvesiclepurificationfordownstreamanalysisacomparisonofdifferentialcentrifugationandsizeexclusionchromatographyforhelminthpathogens
AT davischelsean importanceofextracellularvesiclepurificationfordownstreamanalysisacomparisonofdifferentialcentrifugationandsizeexclusionchromatographyforhelminthpathogens
AT phillipshelen importanceofextracellularvesiclepurificationfordownstreamanalysisacomparisonofdifferentialcentrifugationandsizeexclusionchromatographyforhelminthpathogens
AT tomesjohnj importanceofextracellularvesiclepurificationfordownstreamanalysisacomparisonofdifferentialcentrifugationandsizeexclusionchromatographyforhelminthpathogens
AT swainmartint importanceofextracellularvesiclepurificationfordownstreamanalysisacomparisonofdifferentialcentrifugationandsizeexclusionchromatographyforhelminthpathogens
AT wilkinsontobyj importanceofextracellularvesiclepurificationfordownstreamanalysisacomparisonofdifferentialcentrifugationandsizeexclusionchromatographyforhelminthpathogens
AT brophypeterm importanceofextracellularvesiclepurificationfordownstreamanalysisacomparisonofdifferentialcentrifugationandsizeexclusionchromatographyforhelminthpathogens
AT morphewrussellm importanceofextracellularvesiclepurificationfordownstreamanalysisacomparisonofdifferentialcentrifugationandsizeexclusionchromatographyforhelminthpathogens