Cargando…

Nonconsensual Neurocorrectives and Bodily Integrity: a Reply to Shaw and Barn

In this issue, Elizabeth Shaw and Gulzaar Barn offer a number of replies to my arguments in ‘Criminal Rehabilitation Through Medical Intervention: Moral Liability and the Right to Bodily Integrity’, Journal of Ethics (2014). In this article I respond to some of their criticisms.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Douglas, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6411672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30956728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12152-016-9275-6
_version_ 1783402427531132928
author Douglas, Thomas
author_facet Douglas, Thomas
author_sort Douglas, Thomas
collection PubMed
description In this issue, Elizabeth Shaw and Gulzaar Barn offer a number of replies to my arguments in ‘Criminal Rehabilitation Through Medical Intervention: Moral Liability and the Right to Bodily Integrity’, Journal of Ethics (2014). In this article I respond to some of their criticisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6411672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64116722019-04-03 Nonconsensual Neurocorrectives and Bodily Integrity: a Reply to Shaw and Barn Douglas, Thomas Neuroethics Original Paper In this issue, Elizabeth Shaw and Gulzaar Barn offer a number of replies to my arguments in ‘Criminal Rehabilitation Through Medical Intervention: Moral Liability and the Right to Bodily Integrity’, Journal of Ethics (2014). In this article I respond to some of their criticisms. Springer Netherlands 2016-08-24 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6411672/ /pubmed/30956728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12152-016-9275-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Douglas, Thomas
Nonconsensual Neurocorrectives and Bodily Integrity: a Reply to Shaw and Barn
title Nonconsensual Neurocorrectives and Bodily Integrity: a Reply to Shaw and Barn
title_full Nonconsensual Neurocorrectives and Bodily Integrity: a Reply to Shaw and Barn
title_fullStr Nonconsensual Neurocorrectives and Bodily Integrity: a Reply to Shaw and Barn
title_full_unstemmed Nonconsensual Neurocorrectives and Bodily Integrity: a Reply to Shaw and Barn
title_short Nonconsensual Neurocorrectives and Bodily Integrity: a Reply to Shaw and Barn
title_sort nonconsensual neurocorrectives and bodily integrity: a reply to shaw and barn
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6411672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30956728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12152-016-9275-6
work_keys_str_mv AT douglasthomas nonconsensualneurocorrectivesandbodilyintegrityareplytoshawandbarn