Cargando…
Nonconsensual Neurocorrectives and Bodily Integrity: a Reply to Shaw and Barn
In this issue, Elizabeth Shaw and Gulzaar Barn offer a number of replies to my arguments in ‘Criminal Rehabilitation Through Medical Intervention: Moral Liability and the Right to Bodily Integrity’, Journal of Ethics (2014). In this article I respond to some of their criticisms.
Autor principal: | Douglas, Thomas |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6411672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30956728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12152-016-9275-6 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Expressivist Objection to Nonconsensual Neurocorrectives
por: De Marco, Gabriel, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Nonconsensual neurocorrectives, bypassing, and free action
por: De Marco, Gabriel
Publicado: (2021) -
‘If we don't have consent, we need to have beneficence’: Requiring beneficence in nonconsensual neurocorrection
por: Dore‐Horgan, Emma
Publicado: (2022) -
Nonconsensual sexual relationship and prevalence of HIV infection in adolescent in Jos, Nigeria
por: John, Collins, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Private Shaw and public Shaw : a dual portrait of Lawrence of Arabia and G. B. S.
por: Weintraub, Stanley, 1929-
Publicado: (1963)