Cargando…

Updated Sniffin’ Sticks normative data based on an extended sample of 9139 subjects

PURPOSE: To provide up-to-date and detailed normative data based on a large-scale sample, increasing diagnostic validity by reference to narrow age groups as previous normative values were based upon smaller sample sizes—especially in the group of older subjects. METHOD: Data were obtained from 9139...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oleszkiewicz, A., Schriever, V. A., Croy, I., Hähner, A., Hummel, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6411676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30554358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5248-1
_version_ 1783402428461219840
author Oleszkiewicz, A.
Schriever, V. A.
Croy, I.
Hähner, A.
Hummel, Thomas
author_facet Oleszkiewicz, A.
Schriever, V. A.
Croy, I.
Hähner, A.
Hummel, Thomas
author_sort Oleszkiewicz, A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To provide up-to-date and detailed normative data based on a large-scale sample, increasing diagnostic validity by reference to narrow age groups as previous normative values were based upon smaller sample sizes—especially in the group of older subjects. METHOD: Data were obtained from 9139 healthy subjects (4928 females aged 5–96 years and 4211 males aged 5–91 years). The standard “Sniffin’ Sticks” test was applied, comprising threshold (T), discrimination (D) and identification (I) subtests, and yielding a TDI sum score. RESULTS: Hyposmia was established at a TDI score of less than 30.75. Age-related changes were found in each domain, most pronounced for thresholds. Individuals aged 20–30 years performed best, whereas children below the age of 10 and adults above the age of 71 scored only half as well. Sex-related differences were in favor of women. CONCLUSIONS: Data provide guidance for assessing individual olfactory performance in relation to specific age groups. Significant gender and age effects were observed, with a most pronounced increase of olfactory test scores between age 5 through 20 years and a dramatic decrease at the age of 60 through 71 years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6411676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64116762019-04-03 Updated Sniffin’ Sticks normative data based on an extended sample of 9139 subjects Oleszkiewicz, A. Schriever, V. A. Croy, I. Hähner, A. Hummel, Thomas Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Rhinology PURPOSE: To provide up-to-date and detailed normative data based on a large-scale sample, increasing diagnostic validity by reference to narrow age groups as previous normative values were based upon smaller sample sizes—especially in the group of older subjects. METHOD: Data were obtained from 9139 healthy subjects (4928 females aged 5–96 years and 4211 males aged 5–91 years). The standard “Sniffin’ Sticks” test was applied, comprising threshold (T), discrimination (D) and identification (I) subtests, and yielding a TDI sum score. RESULTS: Hyposmia was established at a TDI score of less than 30.75. Age-related changes were found in each domain, most pronounced for thresholds. Individuals aged 20–30 years performed best, whereas children below the age of 10 and adults above the age of 71 scored only half as well. Sex-related differences were in favor of women. CONCLUSIONS: Data provide guidance for assessing individual olfactory performance in relation to specific age groups. Significant gender and age effects were observed, with a most pronounced increase of olfactory test scores between age 5 through 20 years and a dramatic decrease at the age of 60 through 71 years. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-12-15 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6411676/ /pubmed/30554358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5248-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Rhinology
Oleszkiewicz, A.
Schriever, V. A.
Croy, I.
Hähner, A.
Hummel, Thomas
Updated Sniffin’ Sticks normative data based on an extended sample of 9139 subjects
title Updated Sniffin’ Sticks normative data based on an extended sample of 9139 subjects
title_full Updated Sniffin’ Sticks normative data based on an extended sample of 9139 subjects
title_fullStr Updated Sniffin’ Sticks normative data based on an extended sample of 9139 subjects
title_full_unstemmed Updated Sniffin’ Sticks normative data based on an extended sample of 9139 subjects
title_short Updated Sniffin’ Sticks normative data based on an extended sample of 9139 subjects
title_sort updated sniffin’ sticks normative data based on an extended sample of 9139 subjects
topic Rhinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6411676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30554358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5248-1
work_keys_str_mv AT oleszkiewicza updatedsniffinsticksnormativedatabasedonanextendedsampleof9139subjects
AT schrieverva updatedsniffinsticksnormativedatabasedonanextendedsampleof9139subjects
AT croyi updatedsniffinsticksnormativedatabasedonanextendedsampleof9139subjects
AT hahnera updatedsniffinsticksnormativedatabasedonanextendedsampleof9139subjects
AT hummelthomas updatedsniffinsticksnormativedatabasedonanextendedsampleof9139subjects