Cargando…

Metacognition across sensory modalities: Vision, warmth, and nociceptive pain

The distinctive experience of pain, beyond mere processing of nociceptive inputs, is much debated in psychology and neuroscience. One aspect of perceptual experience is captured by metacognition—the ability to monitor and evaluate one’s own mental processes. We investigated confidence in judgements...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beck, Brianna, Peña-Vivas, Valentina, Fleming, Stephen, Haggard, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6411924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30739057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.01.018
_version_ 1783402484507607040
author Beck, Brianna
Peña-Vivas, Valentina
Fleming, Stephen
Haggard, Patrick
author_facet Beck, Brianna
Peña-Vivas, Valentina
Fleming, Stephen
Haggard, Patrick
author_sort Beck, Brianna
collection PubMed
description The distinctive experience of pain, beyond mere processing of nociceptive inputs, is much debated in psychology and neuroscience. One aspect of perceptual experience is captured by metacognition—the ability to monitor and evaluate one’s own mental processes. We investigated confidence in judgements about nociceptive pain (i.e. pain that arises from the activation of nociceptors by a noxious stimulus) to determine whether metacognitive processes contribute to the distinctiveness of the pain experience. Our participants made intensity judgements about noxious heat, innocuous warmth, and visual contrast (first-order, perceptual decisions) and rated their confidence in those judgements (second-order, metacognitive decisions). First-order task performance between modalities was balanced using adaptive staircase procedures. For each modality, we quantified metacognitive efficiency (meta-d’/d’)—the degree to which participants’ confidence reports were informed by the same evidence that contributed to their perceptual judgements—and metacognitive bias (mean confidence)—the participant’s tendency to report higher or lower confidence overall. We found no overall differences in metacognitive efficiency or mean confidence between modalities. Mean confidence ratings were highly correlated between all three tasks, reflecting stable inter-individual variability in metacognitive bias. However, metacognitive efficiency for pain varied independently of metacognitive efficiency for warmth and visual perception. That is, those participants who had higher metacognitive efficiency in the visual task also tended to have higher metacognitive efficiency in the warmth task, but not necessarily in the pain task. We thus suggest that some distinctive and idiosyncratic aspects of the pain experience may stem from additional variability at a metacognitive level. We further speculate that this additional variability may arise from the affective or arousal aspects of pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6411924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64119242019-05-01 Metacognition across sensory modalities: Vision, warmth, and nociceptive pain Beck, Brianna Peña-Vivas, Valentina Fleming, Stephen Haggard, Patrick Cognition Article The distinctive experience of pain, beyond mere processing of nociceptive inputs, is much debated in psychology and neuroscience. One aspect of perceptual experience is captured by metacognition—the ability to monitor and evaluate one’s own mental processes. We investigated confidence in judgements about nociceptive pain (i.e. pain that arises from the activation of nociceptors by a noxious stimulus) to determine whether metacognitive processes contribute to the distinctiveness of the pain experience. Our participants made intensity judgements about noxious heat, innocuous warmth, and visual contrast (first-order, perceptual decisions) and rated their confidence in those judgements (second-order, metacognitive decisions). First-order task performance between modalities was balanced using adaptive staircase procedures. For each modality, we quantified metacognitive efficiency (meta-d’/d’)—the degree to which participants’ confidence reports were informed by the same evidence that contributed to their perceptual judgements—and metacognitive bias (mean confidence)—the participant’s tendency to report higher or lower confidence overall. We found no overall differences in metacognitive efficiency or mean confidence between modalities. Mean confidence ratings were highly correlated between all three tasks, reflecting stable inter-individual variability in metacognitive bias. However, metacognitive efficiency for pain varied independently of metacognitive efficiency for warmth and visual perception. That is, those participants who had higher metacognitive efficiency in the visual task also tended to have higher metacognitive efficiency in the warmth task, but not necessarily in the pain task. We thus suggest that some distinctive and idiosyncratic aspects of the pain experience may stem from additional variability at a metacognitive level. We further speculate that this additional variability may arise from the affective or arousal aspects of pain. Elsevier 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6411924/ /pubmed/30739057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.01.018 Text en © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Beck, Brianna
Peña-Vivas, Valentina
Fleming, Stephen
Haggard, Patrick
Metacognition across sensory modalities: Vision, warmth, and nociceptive pain
title Metacognition across sensory modalities: Vision, warmth, and nociceptive pain
title_full Metacognition across sensory modalities: Vision, warmth, and nociceptive pain
title_fullStr Metacognition across sensory modalities: Vision, warmth, and nociceptive pain
title_full_unstemmed Metacognition across sensory modalities: Vision, warmth, and nociceptive pain
title_short Metacognition across sensory modalities: Vision, warmth, and nociceptive pain
title_sort metacognition across sensory modalities: vision, warmth, and nociceptive pain
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6411924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30739057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.01.018
work_keys_str_mv AT beckbrianna metacognitionacrosssensorymodalitiesvisionwarmthandnociceptivepain
AT penavivasvalentina metacognitionacrosssensorymodalitiesvisionwarmthandnociceptivepain
AT flemingstephen metacognitionacrosssensorymodalitiesvisionwarmthandnociceptivepain
AT haggardpatrick metacognitionacrosssensorymodalitiesvisionwarmthandnociceptivepain