Cargando…

Investigating Items to Improve the Validity of the Five-Item Healthy Eating Score Compared with the 2015 Healthy Eating Index in a Military Population

Military researchers utilize a five-item healthy eating score (HES-5) in the Global Assessment Tool (GAT) questionnaire to quickly assess the overall diet quality of military personnel. This study aimed to modify the HES-5 to improve its validity relative to the 2015 Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2015)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shams-White, Marissa M., Chui, Kenneth, Deuster, Patricia A., McKeown, Nicola M., Must, Aviva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6412234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30678099
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11020251
_version_ 1783402557905829888
author Shams-White, Marissa M.
Chui, Kenneth
Deuster, Patricia A.
McKeown, Nicola M.
Must, Aviva
author_facet Shams-White, Marissa M.
Chui, Kenneth
Deuster, Patricia A.
McKeown, Nicola M.
Must, Aviva
author_sort Shams-White, Marissa M.
collection PubMed
description Military researchers utilize a five-item healthy eating score (HES-5) in the Global Assessment Tool (GAT) questionnaire to quickly assess the overall diet quality of military personnel. This study aimed to modify the HES-5 to improve its validity relative to the 2015 Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2015) in active duty military personnel (n = 333). A food frequency questionnaire was used to calculate HEI-2015 scores and to assess sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake in 8-oz (SSB-8) and 12-oz servings. GAT nutrition questions were used to calculate HES-5 scores and capture breakfast and post-exercise recovery fueling snack (RFsnack) frequencies. Two scoring options were considered for the highest RFsnack category: “4” vs. “5” (RFsnack-5). Potential candidates were added alone and in combination to the HES-5 and compared to the HEI-2015 with a Pearson correlation coefficient. Scores with the highest correlations were compared via a z-score equation to identify the simplest modification to the HES-5. Correlations between HES-5 and HEI-2015 scores in total participants, males, and females were 0.41, 0.45 and 0.32, respectively. Correlations were most significantly improved in total participants by adding RFsnack-5, SSB-8, RFsnack-5 + SSB-8, and RFsnack-5 + SSB-8 + breakfast, though the addition of SSB-8 + RFsnack-5 performed best (r = 0.53). Future work should consider scoring mechanisms, serving sizes, and question wording.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6412234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64122342019-03-29 Investigating Items to Improve the Validity of the Five-Item Healthy Eating Score Compared with the 2015 Healthy Eating Index in a Military Population Shams-White, Marissa M. Chui, Kenneth Deuster, Patricia A. McKeown, Nicola M. Must, Aviva Nutrients Article Military researchers utilize a five-item healthy eating score (HES-5) in the Global Assessment Tool (GAT) questionnaire to quickly assess the overall diet quality of military personnel. This study aimed to modify the HES-5 to improve its validity relative to the 2015 Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2015) in active duty military personnel (n = 333). A food frequency questionnaire was used to calculate HEI-2015 scores and to assess sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake in 8-oz (SSB-8) and 12-oz servings. GAT nutrition questions were used to calculate HES-5 scores and capture breakfast and post-exercise recovery fueling snack (RFsnack) frequencies. Two scoring options were considered for the highest RFsnack category: “4” vs. “5” (RFsnack-5). Potential candidates were added alone and in combination to the HES-5 and compared to the HEI-2015 with a Pearson correlation coefficient. Scores with the highest correlations were compared via a z-score equation to identify the simplest modification to the HES-5. Correlations between HES-5 and HEI-2015 scores in total participants, males, and females were 0.41, 0.45 and 0.32, respectively. Correlations were most significantly improved in total participants by adding RFsnack-5, SSB-8, RFsnack-5 + SSB-8, and RFsnack-5 + SSB-8 + breakfast, though the addition of SSB-8 + RFsnack-5 performed best (r = 0.53). Future work should consider scoring mechanisms, serving sizes, and question wording. MDPI 2019-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6412234/ /pubmed/30678099 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11020251 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Shams-White, Marissa M.
Chui, Kenneth
Deuster, Patricia A.
McKeown, Nicola M.
Must, Aviva
Investigating Items to Improve the Validity of the Five-Item Healthy Eating Score Compared with the 2015 Healthy Eating Index in a Military Population
title Investigating Items to Improve the Validity of the Five-Item Healthy Eating Score Compared with the 2015 Healthy Eating Index in a Military Population
title_full Investigating Items to Improve the Validity of the Five-Item Healthy Eating Score Compared with the 2015 Healthy Eating Index in a Military Population
title_fullStr Investigating Items to Improve the Validity of the Five-Item Healthy Eating Score Compared with the 2015 Healthy Eating Index in a Military Population
title_full_unstemmed Investigating Items to Improve the Validity of the Five-Item Healthy Eating Score Compared with the 2015 Healthy Eating Index in a Military Population
title_short Investigating Items to Improve the Validity of the Five-Item Healthy Eating Score Compared with the 2015 Healthy Eating Index in a Military Population
title_sort investigating items to improve the validity of the five-item healthy eating score compared with the 2015 healthy eating index in a military population
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6412234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30678099
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11020251
work_keys_str_mv AT shamswhitemarissam investigatingitemstoimprovethevalidityofthefiveitemhealthyeatingscorecomparedwiththe2015healthyeatingindexinamilitarypopulation
AT chuikenneth investigatingitemstoimprovethevalidityofthefiveitemhealthyeatingscorecomparedwiththe2015healthyeatingindexinamilitarypopulation
AT deusterpatriciaa investigatingitemstoimprovethevalidityofthefiveitemhealthyeatingscorecomparedwiththe2015healthyeatingindexinamilitarypopulation
AT mckeownnicolam investigatingitemstoimprovethevalidityofthefiveitemhealthyeatingscorecomparedwiththe2015healthyeatingindexinamilitarypopulation
AT mustaviva investigatingitemstoimprovethevalidityofthefiveitemhealthyeatingscorecomparedwiththe2015healthyeatingindexinamilitarypopulation