Cargando…

Assessment of Packaged Foods and Beverages Carrying Nutrition Marketing against Canada’s Food Guide Recommendations

Canadians’ food purchases consist largely of packaged processed and ultra-processed products, which typically fall outside the “core” foods recommended by Canada’s Food Guide (CFG). Almost half of packaged products in Canada carry nutrition marketing (i.e., nutrient content and health claims). This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Franco-Arellano, Beatriz, Kim, Min Ah, Vandevijvere, Stefanie, Bernstein, Jodi T., Labonté, Marie-Ève, Mulligan, Christine, L’Abbé, Mary R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6412409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30781351
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11020411
_version_ 1783402598344163328
author Franco-Arellano, Beatriz
Kim, Min Ah
Vandevijvere, Stefanie
Bernstein, Jodi T.
Labonté, Marie-Ève
Mulligan, Christine
L’Abbé, Mary R.
author_facet Franco-Arellano, Beatriz
Kim, Min Ah
Vandevijvere, Stefanie
Bernstein, Jodi T.
Labonté, Marie-Ève
Mulligan, Christine
L’Abbé, Mary R.
author_sort Franco-Arellano, Beatriz
collection PubMed
description Canadians’ food purchases consist largely of packaged processed and ultra-processed products, which typically fall outside the “core” foods recommended by Canada’s Food Guide (CFG). Almost half of packaged products in Canada carry nutrition marketing (i.e., nutrient content and health claims). This study assessed whether packaged foods carrying nutrition marketing align with recommendations outlined in the 2007 CFG. Label data (n = 9376) were extracted from the 2013 Food Label Information Program (FLIP). Label components (including nutrition marketing) were classified using the International Network for Food and Obesity/NCDs Research, Monitoring and Action Support (INFORMAS) labelling taxonomy. The Health Canada Surveillance Tool (HCST) was used to assess the alignment of products to CFG. Each food or beverage was classified into one of five groups (i.e., Tier 1, Tier 2, Tier 3, Tier 4, “Others”). Products in Tier 1, 2 or water were considered “in line with CFG”. Most products in the analyzed sample were classified as Tier 2 (35%) and Tier 3 (27%). Although foods with nutrition marketing were significantly more likely to align to CFG recommendations (p < 0.001), many products not “in line with CFG” still carried nutrition marketing. This study provides important baseline data that could be used upon the implementation of the new CFG.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6412409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64124092019-03-29 Assessment of Packaged Foods and Beverages Carrying Nutrition Marketing against Canada’s Food Guide Recommendations Franco-Arellano, Beatriz Kim, Min Ah Vandevijvere, Stefanie Bernstein, Jodi T. Labonté, Marie-Ève Mulligan, Christine L’Abbé, Mary R. Nutrients Article Canadians’ food purchases consist largely of packaged processed and ultra-processed products, which typically fall outside the “core” foods recommended by Canada’s Food Guide (CFG). Almost half of packaged products in Canada carry nutrition marketing (i.e., nutrient content and health claims). This study assessed whether packaged foods carrying nutrition marketing align with recommendations outlined in the 2007 CFG. Label data (n = 9376) were extracted from the 2013 Food Label Information Program (FLIP). Label components (including nutrition marketing) were classified using the International Network for Food and Obesity/NCDs Research, Monitoring and Action Support (INFORMAS) labelling taxonomy. The Health Canada Surveillance Tool (HCST) was used to assess the alignment of products to CFG. Each food or beverage was classified into one of five groups (i.e., Tier 1, Tier 2, Tier 3, Tier 4, “Others”). Products in Tier 1, 2 or water were considered “in line with CFG”. Most products in the analyzed sample were classified as Tier 2 (35%) and Tier 3 (27%). Although foods with nutrition marketing were significantly more likely to align to CFG recommendations (p < 0.001), many products not “in line with CFG” still carried nutrition marketing. This study provides important baseline data that could be used upon the implementation of the new CFG. MDPI 2019-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6412409/ /pubmed/30781351 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11020411 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Franco-Arellano, Beatriz
Kim, Min Ah
Vandevijvere, Stefanie
Bernstein, Jodi T.
Labonté, Marie-Ève
Mulligan, Christine
L’Abbé, Mary R.
Assessment of Packaged Foods and Beverages Carrying Nutrition Marketing against Canada’s Food Guide Recommendations
title Assessment of Packaged Foods and Beverages Carrying Nutrition Marketing against Canada’s Food Guide Recommendations
title_full Assessment of Packaged Foods and Beverages Carrying Nutrition Marketing against Canada’s Food Guide Recommendations
title_fullStr Assessment of Packaged Foods and Beverages Carrying Nutrition Marketing against Canada’s Food Guide Recommendations
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Packaged Foods and Beverages Carrying Nutrition Marketing against Canada’s Food Guide Recommendations
title_short Assessment of Packaged Foods and Beverages Carrying Nutrition Marketing against Canada’s Food Guide Recommendations
title_sort assessment of packaged foods and beverages carrying nutrition marketing against canada’s food guide recommendations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6412409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30781351
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11020411
work_keys_str_mv AT francoarellanobeatriz assessmentofpackagedfoodsandbeveragescarryingnutritionmarketingagainstcanadasfoodguiderecommendations
AT kimminah assessmentofpackagedfoodsandbeveragescarryingnutritionmarketingagainstcanadasfoodguiderecommendations
AT vandevijverestefanie assessmentofpackagedfoodsandbeveragescarryingnutritionmarketingagainstcanadasfoodguiderecommendations
AT bernsteinjodit assessmentofpackagedfoodsandbeveragescarryingnutritionmarketingagainstcanadasfoodguiderecommendations
AT labontemarieeve assessmentofpackagedfoodsandbeveragescarryingnutritionmarketingagainstcanadasfoodguiderecommendations
AT mulliganchristine assessmentofpackagedfoodsandbeveragescarryingnutritionmarketingagainstcanadasfoodguiderecommendations
AT labbemaryr assessmentofpackagedfoodsandbeveragescarryingnutritionmarketingagainstcanadasfoodguiderecommendations