Cargando…

The Efficacy of Probiotics, Prebiotic Inulin-Type Fructans, and Synbiotics in Human Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Studies of probiotics, fructan-type prebiotics, and synbiotics in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) show significant heterogeneity in methodology and results. Here, we study the efficacy of such interventions and the reasons for the heterogeneity of their results. Eligible random controlled tria...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Astó, Erola, Méndez, Iago, Audivert, Sergi, Farran-Codina, Andreu, Espadaler, Jordi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6412539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30704039
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11020293
_version_ 1783402628838850560
author Astó, Erola
Méndez, Iago
Audivert, Sergi
Farran-Codina, Andreu
Espadaler, Jordi
author_facet Astó, Erola
Méndez, Iago
Audivert, Sergi
Farran-Codina, Andreu
Espadaler, Jordi
author_sort Astó, Erola
collection PubMed
description Studies of probiotics, fructan-type prebiotics, and synbiotics in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) show significant heterogeneity in methodology and results. Here, we study the efficacy of such interventions and the reasons for the heterogeneity of their results. Eligible random controlled trials were collected from the PUBMED and SCOPUS databases. A total of 18 placebo-controlled and active treatment-controlled (i.e., mesalazine) studies were selected with a Jadad score ≥ 3, including 1491 patients with UC. Data for prebiotics and synbiotics were sparse and consequently these studies were excluded from the meta-analysis. The UC remission efficacy of probiotics was measured in terms of relative risk (RR) and odds ratio (OR). Significant effects were observed in patients with active UC whenever probiotics containing bifidobacteria were used, or when adopting the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-recommended scales (UC Disease Activity Index and Disease Activity Index). By the FDA recommended scales, the RR was 1.55 (CI95%: 1.13–2.15, p-value = 0.007, I(2) = 29%); for bifidobacteria-containing probiotics, the RR was 1.73 (CI95%: 1.23–2.43, p-value = 0.002, I(2) = 35%). No significant effects were observed on the maintenance of remission for placebo-controlled or mesalazine-controlled studies. We conclude that a validated scale is necessary to determine the state of patients with UC. However, probiotics containing bifidobacteria are promising for the treatment of active UC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6412539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64125392019-03-29 The Efficacy of Probiotics, Prebiotic Inulin-Type Fructans, and Synbiotics in Human Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Astó, Erola Méndez, Iago Audivert, Sergi Farran-Codina, Andreu Espadaler, Jordi Nutrients Review Studies of probiotics, fructan-type prebiotics, and synbiotics in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) show significant heterogeneity in methodology and results. Here, we study the efficacy of such interventions and the reasons for the heterogeneity of their results. Eligible random controlled trials were collected from the PUBMED and SCOPUS databases. A total of 18 placebo-controlled and active treatment-controlled (i.e., mesalazine) studies were selected with a Jadad score ≥ 3, including 1491 patients with UC. Data for prebiotics and synbiotics were sparse and consequently these studies were excluded from the meta-analysis. The UC remission efficacy of probiotics was measured in terms of relative risk (RR) and odds ratio (OR). Significant effects were observed in patients with active UC whenever probiotics containing bifidobacteria were used, or when adopting the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-recommended scales (UC Disease Activity Index and Disease Activity Index). By the FDA recommended scales, the RR was 1.55 (CI95%: 1.13–2.15, p-value = 0.007, I(2) = 29%); for bifidobacteria-containing probiotics, the RR was 1.73 (CI95%: 1.23–2.43, p-value = 0.002, I(2) = 35%). No significant effects were observed on the maintenance of remission for placebo-controlled or mesalazine-controlled studies. We conclude that a validated scale is necessary to determine the state of patients with UC. However, probiotics containing bifidobacteria are promising for the treatment of active UC. MDPI 2019-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6412539/ /pubmed/30704039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11020293 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Astó, Erola
Méndez, Iago
Audivert, Sergi
Farran-Codina, Andreu
Espadaler, Jordi
The Efficacy of Probiotics, Prebiotic Inulin-Type Fructans, and Synbiotics in Human Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title The Efficacy of Probiotics, Prebiotic Inulin-Type Fructans, and Synbiotics in Human Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full The Efficacy of Probiotics, Prebiotic Inulin-Type Fructans, and Synbiotics in Human Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Efficacy of Probiotics, Prebiotic Inulin-Type Fructans, and Synbiotics in Human Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy of Probiotics, Prebiotic Inulin-Type Fructans, and Synbiotics in Human Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short The Efficacy of Probiotics, Prebiotic Inulin-Type Fructans, and Synbiotics in Human Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort efficacy of probiotics, prebiotic inulin-type fructans, and synbiotics in human ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6412539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30704039
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11020293
work_keys_str_mv AT astoerola theefficacyofprobioticsprebioticinulintypefructansandsynbioticsinhumanulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mendeziago theefficacyofprobioticsprebioticinulintypefructansandsynbioticsinhumanulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT audivertsergi theefficacyofprobioticsprebioticinulintypefructansandsynbioticsinhumanulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT farrancodinaandreu theefficacyofprobioticsprebioticinulintypefructansandsynbioticsinhumanulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT espadalerjordi theefficacyofprobioticsprebioticinulintypefructansandsynbioticsinhumanulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT astoerola efficacyofprobioticsprebioticinulintypefructansandsynbioticsinhumanulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mendeziago efficacyofprobioticsprebioticinulintypefructansandsynbioticsinhumanulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT audivertsergi efficacyofprobioticsprebioticinulintypefructansandsynbioticsinhumanulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT farrancodinaandreu efficacyofprobioticsprebioticinulintypefructansandsynbioticsinhumanulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT espadalerjordi efficacyofprobioticsprebioticinulintypefructansandsynbioticsinhumanulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis