Cargando…

Comparison of Argon and Oxygen Plasma Treatments for Ambient Room-Temperature Wafer-Scale Au–Au Bonding Using Ultrathin Au Films

Au–Au surface activated bonding is promising for room-temperature bonding. The use of Ar plasma vs. O(2) plasma for pretreatment was investigated for room-temperature wafer-scale Au–Au bonding using ultrathin Au films (<50 nm) in ambient air. The main difference between Ar plasma and O(2) plasma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamamoto, Michitaka, Matsumae, Takashi, Kurashima, Yuichi, Takagi, Hideki, Suga, Tadatomo, Itoh, Toshihiro, Higurashi, Eiji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6412855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30781779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi10020119
Descripción
Sumario:Au–Au surface activated bonding is promising for room-temperature bonding. The use of Ar plasma vs. O(2) plasma for pretreatment was investigated for room-temperature wafer-scale Au–Au bonding using ultrathin Au films (<50 nm) in ambient air. The main difference between Ar plasma and O(2) plasma is their surface activation mechanism: physical etching and chemical reaction, respectively. Destructive razor blade testing revealed that the bonding strength of samples obtained using Ar plasma treatment was higher than the strength of bulk Si (surface energy of bulk Si: 2.5 J/m(2)), while that of samples obtained using O(2) plasma treatment was low (surface energy: 0.1–0.2 J/m(2)). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis revealed that a gold oxide (Au(2)O(3)) layer readily formed with O(2) plasma treatment, and this layer impeded Au–Au bonding. Thermal desorption spectroscopy analysis revealed that Au(2)O(3) thermally desorbed around 110 °C. Annealing of O(2) plasma-treated samples up to 150 °C before bonding increased the bonding strength from 0.1 to 2.5 J/m(2) due to Au(2)O(3) decomposition.