Cargando…
Comparison of Argon and Oxygen Plasma Treatments for Ambient Room-Temperature Wafer-Scale Au–Au Bonding Using Ultrathin Au Films
Au–Au surface activated bonding is promising for room-temperature bonding. The use of Ar plasma vs. O(2) plasma for pretreatment was investigated for room-temperature wafer-scale Au–Au bonding using ultrathin Au films (<50 nm) in ambient air. The main difference between Ar plasma and O(2) plasma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6412855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30781779 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi10020119 |
_version_ | 1783402702502363136 |
---|---|
author | Yamamoto, Michitaka Matsumae, Takashi Kurashima, Yuichi Takagi, Hideki Suga, Tadatomo Itoh, Toshihiro Higurashi, Eiji |
author_facet | Yamamoto, Michitaka Matsumae, Takashi Kurashima, Yuichi Takagi, Hideki Suga, Tadatomo Itoh, Toshihiro Higurashi, Eiji |
author_sort | Yamamoto, Michitaka |
collection | PubMed |
description | Au–Au surface activated bonding is promising for room-temperature bonding. The use of Ar plasma vs. O(2) plasma for pretreatment was investigated for room-temperature wafer-scale Au–Au bonding using ultrathin Au films (<50 nm) in ambient air. The main difference between Ar plasma and O(2) plasma is their surface activation mechanism: physical etching and chemical reaction, respectively. Destructive razor blade testing revealed that the bonding strength of samples obtained using Ar plasma treatment was higher than the strength of bulk Si (surface energy of bulk Si: 2.5 J/m(2)), while that of samples obtained using O(2) plasma treatment was low (surface energy: 0.1–0.2 J/m(2)). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis revealed that a gold oxide (Au(2)O(3)) layer readily formed with O(2) plasma treatment, and this layer impeded Au–Au bonding. Thermal desorption spectroscopy analysis revealed that Au(2)O(3) thermally desorbed around 110 °C. Annealing of O(2) plasma-treated samples up to 150 °C before bonding increased the bonding strength from 0.1 to 2.5 J/m(2) due to Au(2)O(3) decomposition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6412855 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64128552019-04-09 Comparison of Argon and Oxygen Plasma Treatments for Ambient Room-Temperature Wafer-Scale Au–Au Bonding Using Ultrathin Au Films Yamamoto, Michitaka Matsumae, Takashi Kurashima, Yuichi Takagi, Hideki Suga, Tadatomo Itoh, Toshihiro Higurashi, Eiji Micromachines (Basel) Article Au–Au surface activated bonding is promising for room-temperature bonding. The use of Ar plasma vs. O(2) plasma for pretreatment was investigated for room-temperature wafer-scale Au–Au bonding using ultrathin Au films (<50 nm) in ambient air. The main difference between Ar plasma and O(2) plasma is their surface activation mechanism: physical etching and chemical reaction, respectively. Destructive razor blade testing revealed that the bonding strength of samples obtained using Ar plasma treatment was higher than the strength of bulk Si (surface energy of bulk Si: 2.5 J/m(2)), while that of samples obtained using O(2) plasma treatment was low (surface energy: 0.1–0.2 J/m(2)). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis revealed that a gold oxide (Au(2)O(3)) layer readily formed with O(2) plasma treatment, and this layer impeded Au–Au bonding. Thermal desorption spectroscopy analysis revealed that Au(2)O(3) thermally desorbed around 110 °C. Annealing of O(2) plasma-treated samples up to 150 °C before bonding increased the bonding strength from 0.1 to 2.5 J/m(2) due to Au(2)O(3) decomposition. MDPI 2019-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6412855/ /pubmed/30781779 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi10020119 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Yamamoto, Michitaka Matsumae, Takashi Kurashima, Yuichi Takagi, Hideki Suga, Tadatomo Itoh, Toshihiro Higurashi, Eiji Comparison of Argon and Oxygen Plasma Treatments for Ambient Room-Temperature Wafer-Scale Au–Au Bonding Using Ultrathin Au Films |
title | Comparison of Argon and Oxygen Plasma Treatments for Ambient Room-Temperature Wafer-Scale Au–Au Bonding Using Ultrathin Au Films |
title_full | Comparison of Argon and Oxygen Plasma Treatments for Ambient Room-Temperature Wafer-Scale Au–Au Bonding Using Ultrathin Au Films |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Argon and Oxygen Plasma Treatments for Ambient Room-Temperature Wafer-Scale Au–Au Bonding Using Ultrathin Au Films |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Argon and Oxygen Plasma Treatments for Ambient Room-Temperature Wafer-Scale Au–Au Bonding Using Ultrathin Au Films |
title_short | Comparison of Argon and Oxygen Plasma Treatments for Ambient Room-Temperature Wafer-Scale Au–Au Bonding Using Ultrathin Au Films |
title_sort | comparison of argon and oxygen plasma treatments for ambient room-temperature wafer-scale au–au bonding using ultrathin au films |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6412855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30781779 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi10020119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yamamotomichitaka comparisonofargonandoxygenplasmatreatmentsforambientroomtemperaturewaferscaleauaubondingusingultrathinaufilms AT matsumaetakashi comparisonofargonandoxygenplasmatreatmentsforambientroomtemperaturewaferscaleauaubondingusingultrathinaufilms AT kurashimayuichi comparisonofargonandoxygenplasmatreatmentsforambientroomtemperaturewaferscaleauaubondingusingultrathinaufilms AT takagihideki comparisonofargonandoxygenplasmatreatmentsforambientroomtemperaturewaferscaleauaubondingusingultrathinaufilms AT sugatadatomo comparisonofargonandoxygenplasmatreatmentsforambientroomtemperaturewaferscaleauaubondingusingultrathinaufilms AT itohtoshihiro comparisonofargonandoxygenplasmatreatmentsforambientroomtemperaturewaferscaleauaubondingusingultrathinaufilms AT higurashieiji comparisonofargonandoxygenplasmatreatmentsforambientroomtemperaturewaferscaleauaubondingusingultrathinaufilms |