Cargando…

Comparison of Argon and Oxygen Plasma Treatments for Ambient Room-Temperature Wafer-Scale Au–Au Bonding Using Ultrathin Au Films

Au–Au surface activated bonding is promising for room-temperature bonding. The use of Ar plasma vs. O(2) plasma for pretreatment was investigated for room-temperature wafer-scale Au–Au bonding using ultrathin Au films (<50 nm) in ambient air. The main difference between Ar plasma and O(2) plasma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamamoto, Michitaka, Matsumae, Takashi, Kurashima, Yuichi, Takagi, Hideki, Suga, Tadatomo, Itoh, Toshihiro, Higurashi, Eiji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6412855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30781779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi10020119
_version_ 1783402702502363136
author Yamamoto, Michitaka
Matsumae, Takashi
Kurashima, Yuichi
Takagi, Hideki
Suga, Tadatomo
Itoh, Toshihiro
Higurashi, Eiji
author_facet Yamamoto, Michitaka
Matsumae, Takashi
Kurashima, Yuichi
Takagi, Hideki
Suga, Tadatomo
Itoh, Toshihiro
Higurashi, Eiji
author_sort Yamamoto, Michitaka
collection PubMed
description Au–Au surface activated bonding is promising for room-temperature bonding. The use of Ar plasma vs. O(2) plasma for pretreatment was investigated for room-temperature wafer-scale Au–Au bonding using ultrathin Au films (<50 nm) in ambient air. The main difference between Ar plasma and O(2) plasma is their surface activation mechanism: physical etching and chemical reaction, respectively. Destructive razor blade testing revealed that the bonding strength of samples obtained using Ar plasma treatment was higher than the strength of bulk Si (surface energy of bulk Si: 2.5 J/m(2)), while that of samples obtained using O(2) plasma treatment was low (surface energy: 0.1–0.2 J/m(2)). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis revealed that a gold oxide (Au(2)O(3)) layer readily formed with O(2) plasma treatment, and this layer impeded Au–Au bonding. Thermal desorption spectroscopy analysis revealed that Au(2)O(3) thermally desorbed around 110 °C. Annealing of O(2) plasma-treated samples up to 150 °C before bonding increased the bonding strength from 0.1 to 2.5 J/m(2) due to Au(2)O(3) decomposition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6412855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64128552019-04-09 Comparison of Argon and Oxygen Plasma Treatments for Ambient Room-Temperature Wafer-Scale Au–Au Bonding Using Ultrathin Au Films Yamamoto, Michitaka Matsumae, Takashi Kurashima, Yuichi Takagi, Hideki Suga, Tadatomo Itoh, Toshihiro Higurashi, Eiji Micromachines (Basel) Article Au–Au surface activated bonding is promising for room-temperature bonding. The use of Ar plasma vs. O(2) plasma for pretreatment was investigated for room-temperature wafer-scale Au–Au bonding using ultrathin Au films (<50 nm) in ambient air. The main difference between Ar plasma and O(2) plasma is their surface activation mechanism: physical etching and chemical reaction, respectively. Destructive razor blade testing revealed that the bonding strength of samples obtained using Ar plasma treatment was higher than the strength of bulk Si (surface energy of bulk Si: 2.5 J/m(2)), while that of samples obtained using O(2) plasma treatment was low (surface energy: 0.1–0.2 J/m(2)). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis revealed that a gold oxide (Au(2)O(3)) layer readily formed with O(2) plasma treatment, and this layer impeded Au–Au bonding. Thermal desorption spectroscopy analysis revealed that Au(2)O(3) thermally desorbed around 110 °C. Annealing of O(2) plasma-treated samples up to 150 °C before bonding increased the bonding strength from 0.1 to 2.5 J/m(2) due to Au(2)O(3) decomposition. MDPI 2019-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6412855/ /pubmed/30781779 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi10020119 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yamamoto, Michitaka
Matsumae, Takashi
Kurashima, Yuichi
Takagi, Hideki
Suga, Tadatomo
Itoh, Toshihiro
Higurashi, Eiji
Comparison of Argon and Oxygen Plasma Treatments for Ambient Room-Temperature Wafer-Scale Au–Au Bonding Using Ultrathin Au Films
title Comparison of Argon and Oxygen Plasma Treatments for Ambient Room-Temperature Wafer-Scale Au–Au Bonding Using Ultrathin Au Films
title_full Comparison of Argon and Oxygen Plasma Treatments for Ambient Room-Temperature Wafer-Scale Au–Au Bonding Using Ultrathin Au Films
title_fullStr Comparison of Argon and Oxygen Plasma Treatments for Ambient Room-Temperature Wafer-Scale Au–Au Bonding Using Ultrathin Au Films
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Argon and Oxygen Plasma Treatments for Ambient Room-Temperature Wafer-Scale Au–Au Bonding Using Ultrathin Au Films
title_short Comparison of Argon and Oxygen Plasma Treatments for Ambient Room-Temperature Wafer-Scale Au–Au Bonding Using Ultrathin Au Films
title_sort comparison of argon and oxygen plasma treatments for ambient room-temperature wafer-scale au–au bonding using ultrathin au films
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6412855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30781779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi10020119
work_keys_str_mv AT yamamotomichitaka comparisonofargonandoxygenplasmatreatmentsforambientroomtemperaturewaferscaleauaubondingusingultrathinaufilms
AT matsumaetakashi comparisonofargonandoxygenplasmatreatmentsforambientroomtemperaturewaferscaleauaubondingusingultrathinaufilms
AT kurashimayuichi comparisonofargonandoxygenplasmatreatmentsforambientroomtemperaturewaferscaleauaubondingusingultrathinaufilms
AT takagihideki comparisonofargonandoxygenplasmatreatmentsforambientroomtemperaturewaferscaleauaubondingusingultrathinaufilms
AT sugatadatomo comparisonofargonandoxygenplasmatreatmentsforambientroomtemperaturewaferscaleauaubondingusingultrathinaufilms
AT itohtoshihiro comparisonofargonandoxygenplasmatreatmentsforambientroomtemperaturewaferscaleauaubondingusingultrathinaufilms
AT higurashieiji comparisonofargonandoxygenplasmatreatmentsforambientroomtemperaturewaferscaleauaubondingusingultrathinaufilms