Cargando…
Graphene-Based Ammonia Sensors Functionalised with Sub-Monolayer V(2)O(5): A Comparative Study of Chemical Vapour Deposited and Epitaxial Graphene †
Graphene in its pristine form has demonstrated a gas detection ability in an inert carrier gas. For practical use in ambient atmosphere, its sensor properties should be enhanced with functionalisation by defects and dopants, or by decoration with nanophases of metals or/and metal oxides. Excellent s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6413083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30813421 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19040951 |
_version_ | 1783402756425383936 |
---|---|
author | Kodu, Margus Berholts, Artjom Kahro, Tauno Eriksson, Jens Yakimova, Rositsa Avarmaa, Tea Renge, Indrek Alles, Harry Jaaniso, Raivo |
author_facet | Kodu, Margus Berholts, Artjom Kahro, Tauno Eriksson, Jens Yakimova, Rositsa Avarmaa, Tea Renge, Indrek Alles, Harry Jaaniso, Raivo |
author_sort | Kodu, Margus |
collection | PubMed |
description | Graphene in its pristine form has demonstrated a gas detection ability in an inert carrier gas. For practical use in ambient atmosphere, its sensor properties should be enhanced with functionalisation by defects and dopants, or by decoration with nanophases of metals or/and metal oxides. Excellent sensor behaviour was found for two types of single layer graphenes: grown by chemical vapour deposition (CVD) and transferred onto oxidized silicon (Si/SiO(2)/CVDG), and the epitaxial graphene grown on SiC (SiC/EG). Both graphene samples were functionalised using a pulsed laser deposited (PLD) thin V(2)O(5) layer of average thickness ≈ 0.6 nm. According to the Raman spectra, the SiC/EG has a remarkable resistance against structural damage under the laser deposition conditions. By contrast, the PLD process readily induces defects in CVD graphene. Both sensors showed remarkable and selective sensing of NH(3) gas in terms of response amplitude and speed, as well as recovery rate. SiC/EG showed a response that was an order of magnitude larger as compared to similarly functionalised CVDG sensor (295% vs. 31% for 100 ppm NH(3)). The adsorption site properties are assigned to deposited V(2)O(5) nanophase, being similar for both sensors, rather than (defect) graphene itself. The substantially larger response of SiC/EG sensor is probably the result of the smaller initial free charge carrier doping in EG. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6413083 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64130832019-04-03 Graphene-Based Ammonia Sensors Functionalised with Sub-Monolayer V(2)O(5): A Comparative Study of Chemical Vapour Deposited and Epitaxial Graphene † Kodu, Margus Berholts, Artjom Kahro, Tauno Eriksson, Jens Yakimova, Rositsa Avarmaa, Tea Renge, Indrek Alles, Harry Jaaniso, Raivo Sensors (Basel) Article Graphene in its pristine form has demonstrated a gas detection ability in an inert carrier gas. For practical use in ambient atmosphere, its sensor properties should be enhanced with functionalisation by defects and dopants, or by decoration with nanophases of metals or/and metal oxides. Excellent sensor behaviour was found for two types of single layer graphenes: grown by chemical vapour deposition (CVD) and transferred onto oxidized silicon (Si/SiO(2)/CVDG), and the epitaxial graphene grown on SiC (SiC/EG). Both graphene samples were functionalised using a pulsed laser deposited (PLD) thin V(2)O(5) layer of average thickness ≈ 0.6 nm. According to the Raman spectra, the SiC/EG has a remarkable resistance against structural damage under the laser deposition conditions. By contrast, the PLD process readily induces defects in CVD graphene. Both sensors showed remarkable and selective sensing of NH(3) gas in terms of response amplitude and speed, as well as recovery rate. SiC/EG showed a response that was an order of magnitude larger as compared to similarly functionalised CVDG sensor (295% vs. 31% for 100 ppm NH(3)). The adsorption site properties are assigned to deposited V(2)O(5) nanophase, being similar for both sensors, rather than (defect) graphene itself. The substantially larger response of SiC/EG sensor is probably the result of the smaller initial free charge carrier doping in EG. MDPI 2019-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6413083/ /pubmed/30813421 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19040951 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kodu, Margus Berholts, Artjom Kahro, Tauno Eriksson, Jens Yakimova, Rositsa Avarmaa, Tea Renge, Indrek Alles, Harry Jaaniso, Raivo Graphene-Based Ammonia Sensors Functionalised with Sub-Monolayer V(2)O(5): A Comparative Study of Chemical Vapour Deposited and Epitaxial Graphene † |
title | Graphene-Based Ammonia Sensors Functionalised with Sub-Monolayer V(2)O(5): A Comparative Study of Chemical Vapour Deposited and Epitaxial Graphene † |
title_full | Graphene-Based Ammonia Sensors Functionalised with Sub-Monolayer V(2)O(5): A Comparative Study of Chemical Vapour Deposited and Epitaxial Graphene † |
title_fullStr | Graphene-Based Ammonia Sensors Functionalised with Sub-Monolayer V(2)O(5): A Comparative Study of Chemical Vapour Deposited and Epitaxial Graphene † |
title_full_unstemmed | Graphene-Based Ammonia Sensors Functionalised with Sub-Monolayer V(2)O(5): A Comparative Study of Chemical Vapour Deposited and Epitaxial Graphene † |
title_short | Graphene-Based Ammonia Sensors Functionalised with Sub-Monolayer V(2)O(5): A Comparative Study of Chemical Vapour Deposited and Epitaxial Graphene † |
title_sort | graphene-based ammonia sensors functionalised with sub-monolayer v(2)o(5): a comparative study of chemical vapour deposited and epitaxial graphene † |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6413083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30813421 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19040951 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kodumargus graphenebasedammoniasensorsfunctionalisedwithsubmonolayerv2o5acomparativestudyofchemicalvapourdepositedandepitaxialgraphene AT berholtsartjom graphenebasedammoniasensorsfunctionalisedwithsubmonolayerv2o5acomparativestudyofchemicalvapourdepositedandepitaxialgraphene AT kahrotauno graphenebasedammoniasensorsfunctionalisedwithsubmonolayerv2o5acomparativestudyofchemicalvapourdepositedandepitaxialgraphene AT erikssonjens graphenebasedammoniasensorsfunctionalisedwithsubmonolayerv2o5acomparativestudyofchemicalvapourdepositedandepitaxialgraphene AT yakimovarositsa graphenebasedammoniasensorsfunctionalisedwithsubmonolayerv2o5acomparativestudyofchemicalvapourdepositedandepitaxialgraphene AT avarmaatea graphenebasedammoniasensorsfunctionalisedwithsubmonolayerv2o5acomparativestudyofchemicalvapourdepositedandepitaxialgraphene AT rengeindrek graphenebasedammoniasensorsfunctionalisedwithsubmonolayerv2o5acomparativestudyofchemicalvapourdepositedandepitaxialgraphene AT allesharry graphenebasedammoniasensorsfunctionalisedwithsubmonolayerv2o5acomparativestudyofchemicalvapourdepositedandepitaxialgraphene AT jaanisoraivo graphenebasedammoniasensorsfunctionalisedwithsubmonolayerv2o5acomparativestudyofchemicalvapourdepositedandepitaxialgraphene |