Cargando…

Graphene-Based Ammonia Sensors Functionalised with Sub-Monolayer V(2)O(5): A Comparative Study of Chemical Vapour Deposited and Epitaxial Graphene †

Graphene in its pristine form has demonstrated a gas detection ability in an inert carrier gas. For practical use in ambient atmosphere, its sensor properties should be enhanced with functionalisation by defects and dopants, or by decoration with nanophases of metals or/and metal oxides. Excellent s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kodu, Margus, Berholts, Artjom, Kahro, Tauno, Eriksson, Jens, Yakimova, Rositsa, Avarmaa, Tea, Renge, Indrek, Alles, Harry, Jaaniso, Raivo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6413083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30813421
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19040951
_version_ 1783402756425383936
author Kodu, Margus
Berholts, Artjom
Kahro, Tauno
Eriksson, Jens
Yakimova, Rositsa
Avarmaa, Tea
Renge, Indrek
Alles, Harry
Jaaniso, Raivo
author_facet Kodu, Margus
Berholts, Artjom
Kahro, Tauno
Eriksson, Jens
Yakimova, Rositsa
Avarmaa, Tea
Renge, Indrek
Alles, Harry
Jaaniso, Raivo
author_sort Kodu, Margus
collection PubMed
description Graphene in its pristine form has demonstrated a gas detection ability in an inert carrier gas. For practical use in ambient atmosphere, its sensor properties should be enhanced with functionalisation by defects and dopants, or by decoration with nanophases of metals or/and metal oxides. Excellent sensor behaviour was found for two types of single layer graphenes: grown by chemical vapour deposition (CVD) and transferred onto oxidized silicon (Si/SiO(2)/CVDG), and the epitaxial graphene grown on SiC (SiC/EG). Both graphene samples were functionalised using a pulsed laser deposited (PLD) thin V(2)O(5) layer of average thickness ≈ 0.6 nm. According to the Raman spectra, the SiC/EG has a remarkable resistance against structural damage under the laser deposition conditions. By contrast, the PLD process readily induces defects in CVD graphene. Both sensors showed remarkable and selective sensing of NH(3) gas in terms of response amplitude and speed, as well as recovery rate. SiC/EG showed a response that was an order of magnitude larger as compared to similarly functionalised CVDG sensor (295% vs. 31% for 100 ppm NH(3)). The adsorption site properties are assigned to deposited V(2)O(5) nanophase, being similar for both sensors, rather than (defect) graphene itself. The substantially larger response of SiC/EG sensor is probably the result of the smaller initial free charge carrier doping in EG.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6413083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64130832019-04-03 Graphene-Based Ammonia Sensors Functionalised with Sub-Monolayer V(2)O(5): A Comparative Study of Chemical Vapour Deposited and Epitaxial Graphene † Kodu, Margus Berholts, Artjom Kahro, Tauno Eriksson, Jens Yakimova, Rositsa Avarmaa, Tea Renge, Indrek Alles, Harry Jaaniso, Raivo Sensors (Basel) Article Graphene in its pristine form has demonstrated a gas detection ability in an inert carrier gas. For practical use in ambient atmosphere, its sensor properties should be enhanced with functionalisation by defects and dopants, or by decoration with nanophases of metals or/and metal oxides. Excellent sensor behaviour was found for two types of single layer graphenes: grown by chemical vapour deposition (CVD) and transferred onto oxidized silicon (Si/SiO(2)/CVDG), and the epitaxial graphene grown on SiC (SiC/EG). Both graphene samples were functionalised using a pulsed laser deposited (PLD) thin V(2)O(5) layer of average thickness ≈ 0.6 nm. According to the Raman spectra, the SiC/EG has a remarkable resistance against structural damage under the laser deposition conditions. By contrast, the PLD process readily induces defects in CVD graphene. Both sensors showed remarkable and selective sensing of NH(3) gas in terms of response amplitude and speed, as well as recovery rate. SiC/EG showed a response that was an order of magnitude larger as compared to similarly functionalised CVDG sensor (295% vs. 31% for 100 ppm NH(3)). The adsorption site properties are assigned to deposited V(2)O(5) nanophase, being similar for both sensors, rather than (defect) graphene itself. The substantially larger response of SiC/EG sensor is probably the result of the smaller initial free charge carrier doping in EG. MDPI 2019-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6413083/ /pubmed/30813421 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19040951 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kodu, Margus
Berholts, Artjom
Kahro, Tauno
Eriksson, Jens
Yakimova, Rositsa
Avarmaa, Tea
Renge, Indrek
Alles, Harry
Jaaniso, Raivo
Graphene-Based Ammonia Sensors Functionalised with Sub-Monolayer V(2)O(5): A Comparative Study of Chemical Vapour Deposited and Epitaxial Graphene †
title Graphene-Based Ammonia Sensors Functionalised with Sub-Monolayer V(2)O(5): A Comparative Study of Chemical Vapour Deposited and Epitaxial Graphene †
title_full Graphene-Based Ammonia Sensors Functionalised with Sub-Monolayer V(2)O(5): A Comparative Study of Chemical Vapour Deposited and Epitaxial Graphene †
title_fullStr Graphene-Based Ammonia Sensors Functionalised with Sub-Monolayer V(2)O(5): A Comparative Study of Chemical Vapour Deposited and Epitaxial Graphene †
title_full_unstemmed Graphene-Based Ammonia Sensors Functionalised with Sub-Monolayer V(2)O(5): A Comparative Study of Chemical Vapour Deposited and Epitaxial Graphene †
title_short Graphene-Based Ammonia Sensors Functionalised with Sub-Monolayer V(2)O(5): A Comparative Study of Chemical Vapour Deposited and Epitaxial Graphene †
title_sort graphene-based ammonia sensors functionalised with sub-monolayer v(2)o(5): a comparative study of chemical vapour deposited and epitaxial graphene †
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6413083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30813421
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19040951
work_keys_str_mv AT kodumargus graphenebasedammoniasensorsfunctionalisedwithsubmonolayerv2o5acomparativestudyofchemicalvapourdepositedandepitaxialgraphene
AT berholtsartjom graphenebasedammoniasensorsfunctionalisedwithsubmonolayerv2o5acomparativestudyofchemicalvapourdepositedandepitaxialgraphene
AT kahrotauno graphenebasedammoniasensorsfunctionalisedwithsubmonolayerv2o5acomparativestudyofchemicalvapourdepositedandepitaxialgraphene
AT erikssonjens graphenebasedammoniasensorsfunctionalisedwithsubmonolayerv2o5acomparativestudyofchemicalvapourdepositedandepitaxialgraphene
AT yakimovarositsa graphenebasedammoniasensorsfunctionalisedwithsubmonolayerv2o5acomparativestudyofchemicalvapourdepositedandepitaxialgraphene
AT avarmaatea graphenebasedammoniasensorsfunctionalisedwithsubmonolayerv2o5acomparativestudyofchemicalvapourdepositedandepitaxialgraphene
AT rengeindrek graphenebasedammoniasensorsfunctionalisedwithsubmonolayerv2o5acomparativestudyofchemicalvapourdepositedandepitaxialgraphene
AT allesharry graphenebasedammoniasensorsfunctionalisedwithsubmonolayerv2o5acomparativestudyofchemicalvapourdepositedandepitaxialgraphene
AT jaanisoraivo graphenebasedammoniasensorsfunctionalisedwithsubmonolayerv2o5acomparativestudyofchemicalvapourdepositedandepitaxialgraphene