Cargando…

A Comparative Study of Fractionated Versus Single Dose Injection for Spinal Anesthesia During Cesarean Section in Patients with Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension

BACKGROUND: Local anesthetics for spinal anesthesia in one-single injection are known to induce more severe hypotension than a fractionated dose in healthy obstetric patients. Hypotension in obstetric patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension, including preeclampsia, during spinal anesthesia, cou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nugroho, Alfan Mahdi, Sugiarto, Adhrie, Chandra, Susilo, Lembahmanah, Laras, Septica, Rafidya Indah, Yuneva, Annisaa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6413406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881909
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm-85115
_version_ 1783402812773761024
author Nugroho, Alfan Mahdi
Sugiarto, Adhrie
Chandra, Susilo
Lembahmanah, Laras
Septica, Rafidya Indah
Yuneva, Annisaa
author_facet Nugroho, Alfan Mahdi
Sugiarto, Adhrie
Chandra, Susilo
Lembahmanah, Laras
Septica, Rafidya Indah
Yuneva, Annisaa
author_sort Nugroho, Alfan Mahdi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Local anesthetics for spinal anesthesia in one-single injection are known to induce more severe hypotension than a fractionated dose in healthy obstetric patients. Hypotension in obstetric patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension, including preeclampsia, during spinal anesthesia, could compromise fetal well-being. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the mean arterial pressure (MAP), the total dose of ephedrine required, and level of sensory blockade between the fractionated-dose and single-dose spinal anesthesia injection in obstetric patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension who underwent a cesarean section. METHODS: This single-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted from January to April 2018 after being approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Universitas Indonesia (No. 1174/UN2.F1/ETIK/2017) and recorded at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03693638). After obtaining informed consent, 42 parturients with hypertension in pregnancy (gestational hypertension or preeclampsia), ASA II-III, aged 18 - 40 years, and BMI of 18.5 - 35 kg/m(2) with singleton pregnancy, who were planned for spinal anesthesia for emergency or semi-emergency cesarean section with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (Marcaine(TM), Hospira) and fentanyl, were included in this study. All subjects were randomly divided into two groups including fractionated-dose (FD) and single-dose (SD). RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups in MAP in the first 15 minutes after anesthesia (P > 0.05) and median total dose of ephedrine required (10 (0 - 25) mg in the FD group vs. 15 (0 - 30) mg in the SD group, P = 0.30). However, in the FD group, MAP tended to be higher in the first three minutes compared to the SD group. The level of sensory blockade was mostly at T4, which was not significantly different between the groups (52.4% in FD vs. 42.9% in SD, P = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: In obstetric patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension who underwent a cesarean section, the mean arterial pressure after spinal anesthesia was not significantly different between the fractionated dose of spinal anesthesia injection and single-dose injection. Total ephedrine required and levels of sensory blockade were not significantly different between the groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6413406
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Kowsar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64134062019-03-16 A Comparative Study of Fractionated Versus Single Dose Injection for Spinal Anesthesia During Cesarean Section in Patients with Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension Nugroho, Alfan Mahdi Sugiarto, Adhrie Chandra, Susilo Lembahmanah, Laras Septica, Rafidya Indah Yuneva, Annisaa Anesth Pain Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Local anesthetics for spinal anesthesia in one-single injection are known to induce more severe hypotension than a fractionated dose in healthy obstetric patients. Hypotension in obstetric patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension, including preeclampsia, during spinal anesthesia, could compromise fetal well-being. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the mean arterial pressure (MAP), the total dose of ephedrine required, and level of sensory blockade between the fractionated-dose and single-dose spinal anesthesia injection in obstetric patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension who underwent a cesarean section. METHODS: This single-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted from January to April 2018 after being approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Universitas Indonesia (No. 1174/UN2.F1/ETIK/2017) and recorded at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03693638). After obtaining informed consent, 42 parturients with hypertension in pregnancy (gestational hypertension or preeclampsia), ASA II-III, aged 18 - 40 years, and BMI of 18.5 - 35 kg/m(2) with singleton pregnancy, who were planned for spinal anesthesia for emergency or semi-emergency cesarean section with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (Marcaine(TM), Hospira) and fentanyl, were included in this study. All subjects were randomly divided into two groups including fractionated-dose (FD) and single-dose (SD). RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups in MAP in the first 15 minutes after anesthesia (P > 0.05) and median total dose of ephedrine required (10 (0 - 25) mg in the FD group vs. 15 (0 - 30) mg in the SD group, P = 0.30). However, in the FD group, MAP tended to be higher in the first three minutes compared to the SD group. The level of sensory blockade was mostly at T4, which was not significantly different between the groups (52.4% in FD vs. 42.9% in SD, P = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: In obstetric patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension who underwent a cesarean section, the mean arterial pressure after spinal anesthesia was not significantly different between the fractionated dose of spinal anesthesia injection and single-dose injection. Total ephedrine required and levels of sensory blockade were not significantly different between the groups. Kowsar 2019-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6413406/ /pubmed/30881909 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm-85115 Text en Copyright © 2019, Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nugroho, Alfan Mahdi
Sugiarto, Adhrie
Chandra, Susilo
Lembahmanah, Laras
Septica, Rafidya Indah
Yuneva, Annisaa
A Comparative Study of Fractionated Versus Single Dose Injection for Spinal Anesthesia During Cesarean Section in Patients with Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension
title A Comparative Study of Fractionated Versus Single Dose Injection for Spinal Anesthesia During Cesarean Section in Patients with Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension
title_full A Comparative Study of Fractionated Versus Single Dose Injection for Spinal Anesthesia During Cesarean Section in Patients with Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of Fractionated Versus Single Dose Injection for Spinal Anesthesia During Cesarean Section in Patients with Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of Fractionated Versus Single Dose Injection for Spinal Anesthesia During Cesarean Section in Patients with Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension
title_short A Comparative Study of Fractionated Versus Single Dose Injection for Spinal Anesthesia During Cesarean Section in Patients with Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension
title_sort comparative study of fractionated versus single dose injection for spinal anesthesia during cesarean section in patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6413406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881909
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm-85115
work_keys_str_mv AT nugrohoalfanmahdi acomparativestudyoffractionatedversussingledoseinjectionforspinalanesthesiaduringcesareansectioninpatientswithpregnancyinducedhypertension
AT sugiartoadhrie acomparativestudyoffractionatedversussingledoseinjectionforspinalanesthesiaduringcesareansectioninpatientswithpregnancyinducedhypertension
AT chandrasusilo acomparativestudyoffractionatedversussingledoseinjectionforspinalanesthesiaduringcesareansectioninpatientswithpregnancyinducedhypertension
AT lembahmanahlaras acomparativestudyoffractionatedversussingledoseinjectionforspinalanesthesiaduringcesareansectioninpatientswithpregnancyinducedhypertension
AT septicarafidyaindah acomparativestudyoffractionatedversussingledoseinjectionforspinalanesthesiaduringcesareansectioninpatientswithpregnancyinducedhypertension
AT yunevaannisaa acomparativestudyoffractionatedversussingledoseinjectionforspinalanesthesiaduringcesareansectioninpatientswithpregnancyinducedhypertension
AT nugrohoalfanmahdi comparativestudyoffractionatedversussingledoseinjectionforspinalanesthesiaduringcesareansectioninpatientswithpregnancyinducedhypertension
AT sugiartoadhrie comparativestudyoffractionatedversussingledoseinjectionforspinalanesthesiaduringcesareansectioninpatientswithpregnancyinducedhypertension
AT chandrasusilo comparativestudyoffractionatedversussingledoseinjectionforspinalanesthesiaduringcesareansectioninpatientswithpregnancyinducedhypertension
AT lembahmanahlaras comparativestudyoffractionatedversussingledoseinjectionforspinalanesthesiaduringcesareansectioninpatientswithpregnancyinducedhypertension
AT septicarafidyaindah comparativestudyoffractionatedversussingledoseinjectionforspinalanesthesiaduringcesareansectioninpatientswithpregnancyinducedhypertension
AT yunevaannisaa comparativestudyoffractionatedversussingledoseinjectionforspinalanesthesiaduringcesareansectioninpatientswithpregnancyinducedhypertension