Cargando…

Maximal power production as a function of sex and training status

Maximal muscular power is achieved at lower percentages of maximal strength (1RM); however, this notion has not been elucidated based on sex or training status. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to examine the influence of sex and training status on maximal power production. Sixty men...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Ryan M., Freitas, Eduardo D., Heishman, Aaron D., Kaur, Japneet, Koziol, Karolina J., Galletti, Bianca A., Bemben, Michael G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6413571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30899137
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2018.78904
_version_ 1783402843732967424
author Miller, Ryan M.
Freitas, Eduardo D.
Heishman, Aaron D.
Kaur, Japneet
Koziol, Karolina J.
Galletti, Bianca A.
Bemben, Michael G.
author_facet Miller, Ryan M.
Freitas, Eduardo D.
Heishman, Aaron D.
Kaur, Japneet
Koziol, Karolina J.
Galletti, Bianca A.
Bemben, Michael G.
author_sort Miller, Ryan M.
collection PubMed
description Maximal muscular power is achieved at lower percentages of maximal strength (1RM); however, this notion has not been elucidated based on sex or training status. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to examine the influence of sex and training status on maximal power production. Sixty men and women (resistance trained or untrained) completed 1RM testing for the two-leg press (2LP) and bench press (BP). Participants then returned to perform single repetitions at 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 and 80% of their 1RM to determine muscular power. Factorial analyses determined significant interactions (training status by sex by intensity) for the BP (F=35.6, p<0.001) and 2LP (F=8.2, p<0.001). Subsequent analyses indicated that during the BP trained men produce maximal power between 30-40% 1RM compared to untrained men at 60-70% 1RM. Trained women produced maximal power at 50% 1RM compared to untrained women at 60-70% 1RM. During the 2LP, trained men produced maximal power at 40% 1RM compared to untrained men at 60% 1RM. Trained women produced maximal power at 50% 1RM compared to 60-70% 1RM in untrained women. These data suggest that resistance trained individuals and men display maximal power at a lower relative intensity than untrained individuals and women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6413571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Institute of Sport in Warsaw
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64135712019-03-21 Maximal power production as a function of sex and training status Miller, Ryan M. Freitas, Eduardo D. Heishman, Aaron D. Kaur, Japneet Koziol, Karolina J. Galletti, Bianca A. Bemben, Michael G. Biol Sport Original Paper Maximal muscular power is achieved at lower percentages of maximal strength (1RM); however, this notion has not been elucidated based on sex or training status. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to examine the influence of sex and training status on maximal power production. Sixty men and women (resistance trained or untrained) completed 1RM testing for the two-leg press (2LP) and bench press (BP). Participants then returned to perform single repetitions at 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 and 80% of their 1RM to determine muscular power. Factorial analyses determined significant interactions (training status by sex by intensity) for the BP (F=35.6, p<0.001) and 2LP (F=8.2, p<0.001). Subsequent analyses indicated that during the BP trained men produce maximal power between 30-40% 1RM compared to untrained men at 60-70% 1RM. Trained women produced maximal power at 50% 1RM compared to untrained women at 60-70% 1RM. During the 2LP, trained men produced maximal power at 40% 1RM compared to untrained men at 60% 1RM. Trained women produced maximal power at 50% 1RM compared to 60-70% 1RM in untrained women. These data suggest that resistance trained individuals and men display maximal power at a lower relative intensity than untrained individuals and women. Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2018-10-15 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6413571/ /pubmed/30899137 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2018.78904 Text en Copyright © Biology of Sport 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Miller, Ryan M.
Freitas, Eduardo D.
Heishman, Aaron D.
Kaur, Japneet
Koziol, Karolina J.
Galletti, Bianca A.
Bemben, Michael G.
Maximal power production as a function of sex and training status
title Maximal power production as a function of sex and training status
title_full Maximal power production as a function of sex and training status
title_fullStr Maximal power production as a function of sex and training status
title_full_unstemmed Maximal power production as a function of sex and training status
title_short Maximal power production as a function of sex and training status
title_sort maximal power production as a function of sex and training status
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6413571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30899137
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2018.78904
work_keys_str_mv AT millerryanm maximalpowerproductionasafunctionofsexandtrainingstatus
AT freitaseduardod maximalpowerproductionasafunctionofsexandtrainingstatus
AT heishmanaarond maximalpowerproductionasafunctionofsexandtrainingstatus
AT kaurjapneet maximalpowerproductionasafunctionofsexandtrainingstatus
AT koziolkarolinaj maximalpowerproductionasafunctionofsexandtrainingstatus
AT gallettibiancaa maximalpowerproductionasafunctionofsexandtrainingstatus
AT bembenmichaelg maximalpowerproductionasafunctionofsexandtrainingstatus