Cargando…
Maximal power production as a function of sex and training status
Maximal muscular power is achieved at lower percentages of maximal strength (1RM); however, this notion has not been elucidated based on sex or training status. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to examine the influence of sex and training status on maximal power production. Sixty men...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Institute of Sport in Warsaw
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6413571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30899137 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2018.78904 |
_version_ | 1783402843732967424 |
---|---|
author | Miller, Ryan M. Freitas, Eduardo D. Heishman, Aaron D. Kaur, Japneet Koziol, Karolina J. Galletti, Bianca A. Bemben, Michael G. |
author_facet | Miller, Ryan M. Freitas, Eduardo D. Heishman, Aaron D. Kaur, Japneet Koziol, Karolina J. Galletti, Bianca A. Bemben, Michael G. |
author_sort | Miller, Ryan M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Maximal muscular power is achieved at lower percentages of maximal strength (1RM); however, this notion has not been elucidated based on sex or training status. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to examine the influence of sex and training status on maximal power production. Sixty men and women (resistance trained or untrained) completed 1RM testing for the two-leg press (2LP) and bench press (BP). Participants then returned to perform single repetitions at 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 and 80% of their 1RM to determine muscular power. Factorial analyses determined significant interactions (training status by sex by intensity) for the BP (F=35.6, p<0.001) and 2LP (F=8.2, p<0.001). Subsequent analyses indicated that during the BP trained men produce maximal power between 30-40% 1RM compared to untrained men at 60-70% 1RM. Trained women produced maximal power at 50% 1RM compared to untrained women at 60-70% 1RM. During the 2LP, trained men produced maximal power at 40% 1RM compared to untrained men at 60% 1RM. Trained women produced maximal power at 50% 1RM compared to 60-70% 1RM in untrained women. These data suggest that resistance trained individuals and men display maximal power at a lower relative intensity than untrained individuals and women. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6413571 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Institute of Sport in Warsaw |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64135712019-03-21 Maximal power production as a function of sex and training status Miller, Ryan M. Freitas, Eduardo D. Heishman, Aaron D. Kaur, Japneet Koziol, Karolina J. Galletti, Bianca A. Bemben, Michael G. Biol Sport Original Paper Maximal muscular power is achieved at lower percentages of maximal strength (1RM); however, this notion has not been elucidated based on sex or training status. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to examine the influence of sex and training status on maximal power production. Sixty men and women (resistance trained or untrained) completed 1RM testing for the two-leg press (2LP) and bench press (BP). Participants then returned to perform single repetitions at 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 and 80% of their 1RM to determine muscular power. Factorial analyses determined significant interactions (training status by sex by intensity) for the BP (F=35.6, p<0.001) and 2LP (F=8.2, p<0.001). Subsequent analyses indicated that during the BP trained men produce maximal power between 30-40% 1RM compared to untrained men at 60-70% 1RM. Trained women produced maximal power at 50% 1RM compared to untrained women at 60-70% 1RM. During the 2LP, trained men produced maximal power at 40% 1RM compared to untrained men at 60% 1RM. Trained women produced maximal power at 50% 1RM compared to 60-70% 1RM in untrained women. These data suggest that resistance trained individuals and men display maximal power at a lower relative intensity than untrained individuals and women. Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2018-10-15 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6413571/ /pubmed/30899137 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2018.78904 Text en Copyright © Biology of Sport 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Miller, Ryan M. Freitas, Eduardo D. Heishman, Aaron D. Kaur, Japneet Koziol, Karolina J. Galletti, Bianca A. Bemben, Michael G. Maximal power production as a function of sex and training status |
title | Maximal power production as a function of sex and training status |
title_full | Maximal power production as a function of sex and training status |
title_fullStr | Maximal power production as a function of sex and training status |
title_full_unstemmed | Maximal power production as a function of sex and training status |
title_short | Maximal power production as a function of sex and training status |
title_sort | maximal power production as a function of sex and training status |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6413571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30899137 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2018.78904 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT millerryanm maximalpowerproductionasafunctionofsexandtrainingstatus AT freitaseduardod maximalpowerproductionasafunctionofsexandtrainingstatus AT heishmanaarond maximalpowerproductionasafunctionofsexandtrainingstatus AT kaurjapneet maximalpowerproductionasafunctionofsexandtrainingstatus AT koziolkarolinaj maximalpowerproductionasafunctionofsexandtrainingstatus AT gallettibiancaa maximalpowerproductionasafunctionofsexandtrainingstatus AT bembenmichaelg maximalpowerproductionasafunctionofsexandtrainingstatus |