Cargando…

Physiological and Perceptual Responses to High-Intensity Circuit Training using Body Weight as Resistance: Are There Sex-Specific Differences?

High-intensity circuit training (HICT) using body weight as resistance is a popular fitness trend and an ideal exercise modality in terms of functionality and economy. Given the popularity of HICT, evidence suggests that sex may elicit unique physiological and perceptual responses to this mode of ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: CLAYTON, BETHANNE C., TINIUS, RACHEL A., WINCHESTER, LEE J., MENKE, BRENNA R., REECE, MICHELLE C., MAPLES, JILL M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Berkeley Electronic Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6413850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30899349
_version_ 1783402895407841280
author CLAYTON, BETHANNE C.
TINIUS, RACHEL A.
WINCHESTER, LEE J.
MENKE, BRENNA R.
REECE, MICHELLE C.
MAPLES, JILL M.
author_facet CLAYTON, BETHANNE C.
TINIUS, RACHEL A.
WINCHESTER, LEE J.
MENKE, BRENNA R.
REECE, MICHELLE C.
MAPLES, JILL M.
author_sort CLAYTON, BETHANNE C.
collection PubMed
description High-intensity circuit training (HICT) using body weight as resistance is a popular fitness trend and an ideal exercise modality in terms of functionality and economy. Given the popularity of HICT, evidence suggests that sex may elicit unique physiological and perceptual responses to this mode of exercise and there is a need for further work in this area. The purpose of this study was to examine physiological and perceptual responses of females and males to HICT using body weight resistance exercise. Forty-five participants (23 females and 22 males) completed baseline testing and a 15-minute HICT exercise bout wearing a portable metabolic analyzer. %VO(2max), %HR(max), and RER were monitored during exercise and analyzed at 3 different 5-minute time segments during the HICT (beginning, middle, end). RPE was assessed half-way through the circuit (7.5), immediately upon cessation of exercise (15), and 15-minutes post-exercise (Session RPE). There was a significant (p<0.01) time effect on %VO(2max), %HR(max), RER, and RPE. At all three time points, %VO(2max) was significantly (p<0.02) higher among females compared to males. RER values were significantly (p=0.02) higher among females during the last 5-minute segment (i.e. the end) of the exercise bout. However there were no differences in %HR(max) (p>0.20). Males reported a higher RPE immediately post-exercise compared to females (p=0.01). Taken together, these data suggest that there are distinct, sex-specific physiological and perceptual responses to HICT; thus, sex-specific exercise prescription considerations are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6413850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Berkeley Electronic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64138502019-03-19 Physiological and Perceptual Responses to High-Intensity Circuit Training using Body Weight as Resistance: Are There Sex-Specific Differences? CLAYTON, BETHANNE C. TINIUS, RACHEL A. WINCHESTER, LEE J. MENKE, BRENNA R. REECE, MICHELLE C. MAPLES, JILL M. Int J Exerc Sci Original Research High-intensity circuit training (HICT) using body weight as resistance is a popular fitness trend and an ideal exercise modality in terms of functionality and economy. Given the popularity of HICT, evidence suggests that sex may elicit unique physiological and perceptual responses to this mode of exercise and there is a need for further work in this area. The purpose of this study was to examine physiological and perceptual responses of females and males to HICT using body weight resistance exercise. Forty-five participants (23 females and 22 males) completed baseline testing and a 15-minute HICT exercise bout wearing a portable metabolic analyzer. %VO(2max), %HR(max), and RER were monitored during exercise and analyzed at 3 different 5-minute time segments during the HICT (beginning, middle, end). RPE was assessed half-way through the circuit (7.5), immediately upon cessation of exercise (15), and 15-minutes post-exercise (Session RPE). There was a significant (p<0.01) time effect on %VO(2max), %HR(max), RER, and RPE. At all three time points, %VO(2max) was significantly (p<0.02) higher among females compared to males. RER values were significantly (p=0.02) higher among females during the last 5-minute segment (i.e. the end) of the exercise bout. However there were no differences in %HR(max) (p>0.20). Males reported a higher RPE immediately post-exercise compared to females (p=0.01). Taken together, these data suggest that there are distinct, sex-specific physiological and perceptual responses to HICT; thus, sex-specific exercise prescription considerations are warranted. Berkeley Electronic Press 2019-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6413850/ /pubmed/30899349 Text en
spellingShingle Original Research
CLAYTON, BETHANNE C.
TINIUS, RACHEL A.
WINCHESTER, LEE J.
MENKE, BRENNA R.
REECE, MICHELLE C.
MAPLES, JILL M.
Physiological and Perceptual Responses to High-Intensity Circuit Training using Body Weight as Resistance: Are There Sex-Specific Differences?
title Physiological and Perceptual Responses to High-Intensity Circuit Training using Body Weight as Resistance: Are There Sex-Specific Differences?
title_full Physiological and Perceptual Responses to High-Intensity Circuit Training using Body Weight as Resistance: Are There Sex-Specific Differences?
title_fullStr Physiological and Perceptual Responses to High-Intensity Circuit Training using Body Weight as Resistance: Are There Sex-Specific Differences?
title_full_unstemmed Physiological and Perceptual Responses to High-Intensity Circuit Training using Body Weight as Resistance: Are There Sex-Specific Differences?
title_short Physiological and Perceptual Responses to High-Intensity Circuit Training using Body Weight as Resistance: Are There Sex-Specific Differences?
title_sort physiological and perceptual responses to high-intensity circuit training using body weight as resistance: are there sex-specific differences?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6413850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30899349
work_keys_str_mv AT claytonbethannec physiologicalandperceptualresponsestohighintensitycircuittrainingusingbodyweightasresistancearetheresexspecificdifferences
AT tiniusrachela physiologicalandperceptualresponsestohighintensitycircuittrainingusingbodyweightasresistancearetheresexspecificdifferences
AT winchesterleej physiologicalandperceptualresponsestohighintensitycircuittrainingusingbodyweightasresistancearetheresexspecificdifferences
AT menkebrennar physiologicalandperceptualresponsestohighintensitycircuittrainingusingbodyweightasresistancearetheresexspecificdifferences
AT reecemichellec physiologicalandperceptualresponsestohighintensitycircuittrainingusingbodyweightasresistancearetheresexspecificdifferences
AT maplesjillm physiologicalandperceptualresponsestohighintensitycircuittrainingusingbodyweightasresistancearetheresexspecificdifferences