Cargando…

Effects of Personal Body Armor on Functional Movement Capability

The Functional Movement Screen (FMS) is a tool used to assess fundamental movement patterns and has been utilized to determine movement readiness of tactical athletes. However, tactical athletes rarely perform tasks without load carriage, and limited research evaluating loaded tactical personnel via...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: TOMES, COLIN D, LEWIS, MATTHEW D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Berkeley Electronic Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6413854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30899358
_version_ 1783402896321150976
author TOMES, COLIN D
LEWIS, MATTHEW D.
author_facet TOMES, COLIN D
LEWIS, MATTHEW D.
author_sort TOMES, COLIN D
collection PubMed
description The Functional Movement Screen (FMS) is a tool used to assess fundamental movement patterns and has been utilized to determine movement readiness of tactical athletes. However, tactical athletes rarely perform tasks without load carriage, and limited research evaluating loaded tactical personnel via the FMS has been conducted. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to determine if ballistic vest wear results in movement deficits as evaluated by the FMS. A convenience sample of college students (n = 31) completed test sessions in loaded and unloaded conditions. Subjects completed each FMS movement and indicated perceived effort on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Sign test was used to determine difference between FMS composite and component scores collected under each condition. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. A significant (p < 0.001) difference in FMS composite scores was identified between loading conditions. Significant FMS score changes between load conditions were identified in the dominant side in-line lunge (p < 0.01), non-dominant side in-line lunge (p < 0.01), dominant shoulder mobility (p < 0.01), non-dominant shoulder mobility (p < 0.01), and non-dominant rotary stability (p = 0.01). Our data indicate ballistic vest wear reduces overall functional movement capacity, as well as mobility related to certain individual FMS components in the population examined. Additionally, results suggest subjects may better tolerate additional load carriage when completing tasks on their dominant side. These results raise important questions regarding design, fit, and task completion for tactical athletes utilizing a ballistic vest.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6413854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Berkeley Electronic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64138542019-03-19 Effects of Personal Body Armor on Functional Movement Capability TOMES, COLIN D LEWIS, MATTHEW D. Int J Exerc Sci Original Research The Functional Movement Screen (FMS) is a tool used to assess fundamental movement patterns and has been utilized to determine movement readiness of tactical athletes. However, tactical athletes rarely perform tasks without load carriage, and limited research evaluating loaded tactical personnel via the FMS has been conducted. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to determine if ballistic vest wear results in movement deficits as evaluated by the FMS. A convenience sample of college students (n = 31) completed test sessions in loaded and unloaded conditions. Subjects completed each FMS movement and indicated perceived effort on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Sign test was used to determine difference between FMS composite and component scores collected under each condition. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. A significant (p < 0.001) difference in FMS composite scores was identified between loading conditions. Significant FMS score changes between load conditions were identified in the dominant side in-line lunge (p < 0.01), non-dominant side in-line lunge (p < 0.01), dominant shoulder mobility (p < 0.01), non-dominant shoulder mobility (p < 0.01), and non-dominant rotary stability (p = 0.01). Our data indicate ballistic vest wear reduces overall functional movement capacity, as well as mobility related to certain individual FMS components in the population examined. Additionally, results suggest subjects may better tolerate additional load carriage when completing tasks on their dominant side. These results raise important questions regarding design, fit, and task completion for tactical athletes utilizing a ballistic vest. Berkeley Electronic Press 2019-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6413854/ /pubmed/30899358 Text en
spellingShingle Original Research
TOMES, COLIN D
LEWIS, MATTHEW D.
Effects of Personal Body Armor on Functional Movement Capability
title Effects of Personal Body Armor on Functional Movement Capability
title_full Effects of Personal Body Armor on Functional Movement Capability
title_fullStr Effects of Personal Body Armor on Functional Movement Capability
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Personal Body Armor on Functional Movement Capability
title_short Effects of Personal Body Armor on Functional Movement Capability
title_sort effects of personal body armor on functional movement capability
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6413854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30899358
work_keys_str_mv AT tomescolind effectsofpersonalbodyarmoronfunctionalmovementcapability
AT lewismatthewd effectsofpersonalbodyarmoronfunctionalmovementcapability