Cargando…

Effects of explant size on epithelial outgrowth, thickness, stratification, ultrastructure and phenotype of cultured limbal epithelial cells

PURPOSE: Transplantation of limbal stem cells is a promising therapy for limbal stem cell deficiency. Limbal cells can be harvested from either a healthy part of the patient’s eye or the eye of a donor. Small explants are less likely to inflict injury to the donor site. We investigated the effects o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Utheim, O. A., Pasovic, L., Raeder, S., Eidet, J. R., Fostad, I. G., Sehic, A., Roald, B., de la Paz, M. F., Lyberg, T., Dartt, D. A., Utheim, T. P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6413940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30861002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212524
_version_ 1783402910504189952
author Utheim, O. A.
Pasovic, L.
Raeder, S.
Eidet, J. R.
Fostad, I. G.
Sehic, A.
Roald, B.
de la Paz, M. F.
Lyberg, T.
Dartt, D. A.
Utheim, T. P.
author_facet Utheim, O. A.
Pasovic, L.
Raeder, S.
Eidet, J. R.
Fostad, I. G.
Sehic, A.
Roald, B.
de la Paz, M. F.
Lyberg, T.
Dartt, D. A.
Utheim, T. P.
author_sort Utheim, O. A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Transplantation of limbal stem cells is a promising therapy for limbal stem cell deficiency. Limbal cells can be harvested from either a healthy part of the patient’s eye or the eye of a donor. Small explants are less likely to inflict injury to the donor site. We investigated the effects of limbal explant size on multiple characteristics known to be important for transplant function. METHODS: Human limbal epithelial cells were expanded from large versus small explants (3 versus 1 mm of the corneal circumference) for 3 weeks and characterized by light microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and transmission electron microscopy. Epithelial thickness, stratification, outgrowth, ultrastructure and phenotype were assessed. RESULTS: Epithelial thickness and stratification were similar between the groups. Outgrowth size correlated positively with explant size (r = 0.37; P = 0.01), whereas fold growth correlated negatively with explant size (r = –0.55; P < 0.0001). Percentage of cells expressing the limbal epithelial cell marker K19 was higher in cells derived from large explants (99.1±1.2%) compared to cells derived from small explants (93.2±13.6%, P = 0.024). The percentage of cells expressing ABCG2, integrin β1, p63, and p63α that are markers suggestive of an immature phenotype; Keratin 3, Connexin 43, and E-Cadherin that are markers of differentiation; and Ki67 and PCNA that indicate cell proliferation were equal in both groups. Desmosome and hemidesmosome densities were equal between the groups. CONCLUSION: For donor- and culture conditions used in the present study, large explants are preferable to small in terms of outgrowth area. As regards limbal epithelial cell thickness, stratification, mechanical strength, and the attainment of a predominantly immature phenotype, both large and small explants are sufficient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6413940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64139402019-04-02 Effects of explant size on epithelial outgrowth, thickness, stratification, ultrastructure and phenotype of cultured limbal epithelial cells Utheim, O. A. Pasovic, L. Raeder, S. Eidet, J. R. Fostad, I. G. Sehic, A. Roald, B. de la Paz, M. F. Lyberg, T. Dartt, D. A. Utheim, T. P. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: Transplantation of limbal stem cells is a promising therapy for limbal stem cell deficiency. Limbal cells can be harvested from either a healthy part of the patient’s eye or the eye of a donor. Small explants are less likely to inflict injury to the donor site. We investigated the effects of limbal explant size on multiple characteristics known to be important for transplant function. METHODS: Human limbal epithelial cells were expanded from large versus small explants (3 versus 1 mm of the corneal circumference) for 3 weeks and characterized by light microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and transmission electron microscopy. Epithelial thickness, stratification, outgrowth, ultrastructure and phenotype were assessed. RESULTS: Epithelial thickness and stratification were similar between the groups. Outgrowth size correlated positively with explant size (r = 0.37; P = 0.01), whereas fold growth correlated negatively with explant size (r = –0.55; P < 0.0001). Percentage of cells expressing the limbal epithelial cell marker K19 was higher in cells derived from large explants (99.1±1.2%) compared to cells derived from small explants (93.2±13.6%, P = 0.024). The percentage of cells expressing ABCG2, integrin β1, p63, and p63α that are markers suggestive of an immature phenotype; Keratin 3, Connexin 43, and E-Cadherin that are markers of differentiation; and Ki67 and PCNA that indicate cell proliferation were equal in both groups. Desmosome and hemidesmosome densities were equal between the groups. CONCLUSION: For donor- and culture conditions used in the present study, large explants are preferable to small in terms of outgrowth area. As regards limbal epithelial cell thickness, stratification, mechanical strength, and the attainment of a predominantly immature phenotype, both large and small explants are sufficient. Public Library of Science 2019-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6413940/ /pubmed/30861002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212524 Text en © 2019 Utheim et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Utheim, O. A.
Pasovic, L.
Raeder, S.
Eidet, J. R.
Fostad, I. G.
Sehic, A.
Roald, B.
de la Paz, M. F.
Lyberg, T.
Dartt, D. A.
Utheim, T. P.
Effects of explant size on epithelial outgrowth, thickness, stratification, ultrastructure and phenotype of cultured limbal epithelial cells
title Effects of explant size on epithelial outgrowth, thickness, stratification, ultrastructure and phenotype of cultured limbal epithelial cells
title_full Effects of explant size on epithelial outgrowth, thickness, stratification, ultrastructure and phenotype of cultured limbal epithelial cells
title_fullStr Effects of explant size on epithelial outgrowth, thickness, stratification, ultrastructure and phenotype of cultured limbal epithelial cells
title_full_unstemmed Effects of explant size on epithelial outgrowth, thickness, stratification, ultrastructure and phenotype of cultured limbal epithelial cells
title_short Effects of explant size on epithelial outgrowth, thickness, stratification, ultrastructure and phenotype of cultured limbal epithelial cells
title_sort effects of explant size on epithelial outgrowth, thickness, stratification, ultrastructure and phenotype of cultured limbal epithelial cells
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6413940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30861002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212524
work_keys_str_mv AT utheimoa effectsofexplantsizeonepithelialoutgrowththicknessstratificationultrastructureandphenotypeofculturedlimbalepithelialcells
AT pasovicl effectsofexplantsizeonepithelialoutgrowththicknessstratificationultrastructureandphenotypeofculturedlimbalepithelialcells
AT raeders effectsofexplantsizeonepithelialoutgrowththicknessstratificationultrastructureandphenotypeofculturedlimbalepithelialcells
AT eidetjr effectsofexplantsizeonepithelialoutgrowththicknessstratificationultrastructureandphenotypeofculturedlimbalepithelialcells
AT fostadig effectsofexplantsizeonepithelialoutgrowththicknessstratificationultrastructureandphenotypeofculturedlimbalepithelialcells
AT sehica effectsofexplantsizeonepithelialoutgrowththicknessstratificationultrastructureandphenotypeofculturedlimbalepithelialcells
AT roaldb effectsofexplantsizeonepithelialoutgrowththicknessstratificationultrastructureandphenotypeofculturedlimbalepithelialcells
AT delapazmf effectsofexplantsizeonepithelialoutgrowththicknessstratificationultrastructureandphenotypeofculturedlimbalepithelialcells
AT lybergt effectsofexplantsizeonepithelialoutgrowththicknessstratificationultrastructureandphenotypeofculturedlimbalepithelialcells
AT darttda effectsofexplantsizeonepithelialoutgrowththicknessstratificationultrastructureandphenotypeofculturedlimbalepithelialcells
AT utheimtp effectsofexplantsizeonepithelialoutgrowththicknessstratificationultrastructureandphenotypeofculturedlimbalepithelialcells