Cargando…

Antegrade Posterior Interosseous Flap for Nonhealing Wounds of the Elbow: Anatomical and Clinical Study

BACKGROUND: The posterior interosseous artery (PIA) flap has been widely reported to cover defects at the dorsal aspect of the hand. However, the use of this flap to cover elbow defects has been rarely reported. The purpose of this study was to analyze the anatomical feasibility of the PIA flap to c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zaidenberg, Ezequiel Ernesto, Zancolli, Pablo, Farias Cisneros, Efrain, Miller, Aden Gunnar, Moreno, Rodrigo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6414117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001959
_version_ 1783402928982196224
author Zaidenberg, Ezequiel Ernesto
Zancolli, Pablo
Farias Cisneros, Efrain
Miller, Aden Gunnar
Moreno, Rodrigo
author_facet Zaidenberg, Ezequiel Ernesto
Zancolli, Pablo
Farias Cisneros, Efrain
Miller, Aden Gunnar
Moreno, Rodrigo
author_sort Zaidenberg, Ezequiel Ernesto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The posterior interosseous artery (PIA) flap has been widely reported to cover defects at the dorsal aspect of the hand. However, the use of this flap to cover elbow defects has been rarely reported. The purpose of this study was to analyze the anatomical feasibility of the PIA flap to cover elbow soft-tissue defects and, additionally, to review the clinical outcomes of patients treated with this flap. METHODS: An anatomical study was performed on 14 cadaveric specimens to assess the number of PIA perforators at the distal third of the forearm, along with the distance of the perforators from the ulnar styloid. Additionally, the pedicle distance from the pivot point to the lateral epicondyle was recorded. A clinical study in 4 patients with elbow soft-tissue defects treated with the antegrade PIA was also performed to assess viability and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A mean of 3 perforators (range, 2–4) of the PIA were found in the distal third of the forearm. The pedicle distance from the pivot point to the lateral epicondyle was 10 cm (range, 8–11.5 cm). In the clinical study, all cases treated with the antegrade PIA flap showed satisfactory outcomes without loss of the flap or significant partial necrosis. CONCLUSION: In this limited series, the antegrade PIA flap has shown to be a reliable and effective alternative for treatment of soft-tissue defects at the elbow. The PIA perforators in the distal forearm and the pedicle length allow the flap to easily reach the elbow.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6414117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64141172019-03-16 Antegrade Posterior Interosseous Flap for Nonhealing Wounds of the Elbow: Anatomical and Clinical Study Zaidenberg, Ezequiel Ernesto Zancolli, Pablo Farias Cisneros, Efrain Miller, Aden Gunnar Moreno, Rodrigo Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: The posterior interosseous artery (PIA) flap has been widely reported to cover defects at the dorsal aspect of the hand. However, the use of this flap to cover elbow defects has been rarely reported. The purpose of this study was to analyze the anatomical feasibility of the PIA flap to cover elbow soft-tissue defects and, additionally, to review the clinical outcomes of patients treated with this flap. METHODS: An anatomical study was performed on 14 cadaveric specimens to assess the number of PIA perforators at the distal third of the forearm, along with the distance of the perforators from the ulnar styloid. Additionally, the pedicle distance from the pivot point to the lateral epicondyle was recorded. A clinical study in 4 patients with elbow soft-tissue defects treated with the antegrade PIA was also performed to assess viability and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A mean of 3 perforators (range, 2–4) of the PIA were found in the distal third of the forearm. The pedicle distance from the pivot point to the lateral epicondyle was 10 cm (range, 8–11.5 cm). In the clinical study, all cases treated with the antegrade PIA flap showed satisfactory outcomes without loss of the flap or significant partial necrosis. CONCLUSION: In this limited series, the antegrade PIA flap has shown to be a reliable and effective alternative for treatment of soft-tissue defects at the elbow. The PIA perforators in the distal forearm and the pedicle length allow the flap to easily reach the elbow. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6414117/ /pubmed/30881783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001959 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zaidenberg, Ezequiel Ernesto
Zancolli, Pablo
Farias Cisneros, Efrain
Miller, Aden Gunnar
Moreno, Rodrigo
Antegrade Posterior Interosseous Flap for Nonhealing Wounds of the Elbow: Anatomical and Clinical Study
title Antegrade Posterior Interosseous Flap for Nonhealing Wounds of the Elbow: Anatomical and Clinical Study
title_full Antegrade Posterior Interosseous Flap for Nonhealing Wounds of the Elbow: Anatomical and Clinical Study
title_fullStr Antegrade Posterior Interosseous Flap for Nonhealing Wounds of the Elbow: Anatomical and Clinical Study
title_full_unstemmed Antegrade Posterior Interosseous Flap for Nonhealing Wounds of the Elbow: Anatomical and Clinical Study
title_short Antegrade Posterior Interosseous Flap for Nonhealing Wounds of the Elbow: Anatomical and Clinical Study
title_sort antegrade posterior interosseous flap for nonhealing wounds of the elbow: anatomical and clinical study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6414117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001959
work_keys_str_mv AT zaidenbergezequielernesto antegradeposteriorinterosseousflapfornonhealingwoundsoftheelbowanatomicalandclinicalstudy
AT zancollipablo antegradeposteriorinterosseousflapfornonhealingwoundsoftheelbowanatomicalandclinicalstudy
AT fariascisnerosefrain antegradeposteriorinterosseousflapfornonhealingwoundsoftheelbowanatomicalandclinicalstudy
AT milleradengunnar antegradeposteriorinterosseousflapfornonhealingwoundsoftheelbowanatomicalandclinicalstudy
AT morenorodrigo antegradeposteriorinterosseousflapfornonhealingwoundsoftheelbowanatomicalandclinicalstudy