Cargando…
Development and validation of a 3D‐printed bolus cap for total scalp irradiation
PURPOSE: The goal of total scalp irradiation (TSI) is to deliver a uniform dose to the scalp, which requires the use of a bolus cap. Most current methods for fabricating bolus caps are laborious, yet still result in nonconformity and low reproducibility, which can lead to nonuniform irradiation of t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6414136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30821903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12552 |
_version_ | 1783402933426061312 |
---|---|
author | Baltz, Garrett C. Chi, Pai‐Chun Melinda Wong, Pei‐Fong Wang, Congjun Craft, Daniel F. Kry, Stephen F. Lin, Stacy Sydney Hsinyi Garden, Adam S. Smith, Susan A. Howell, Rebecca M. |
author_facet | Baltz, Garrett C. Chi, Pai‐Chun Melinda Wong, Pei‐Fong Wang, Congjun Craft, Daniel F. Kry, Stephen F. Lin, Stacy Sydney Hsinyi Garden, Adam S. Smith, Susan A. Howell, Rebecca M. |
author_sort | Baltz, Garrett C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The goal of total scalp irradiation (TSI) is to deliver a uniform dose to the scalp, which requires the use of a bolus cap. Most current methods for fabricating bolus caps are laborious, yet still result in nonconformity and low reproducibility, which can lead to nonuniform irradiation of the scalp. We developed and validated patient‐specific bolus caps for TSI using three‐dimensional (3D) printing. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 3D‐printing materials were radiologically analyzed to identify a material with properties suitable for use as a bolus cap. A Python script was developed within a commercial treatment planning system to automate the creation of a ready‐to‐print, patient‐specific 3D bolus cap model. A bolus cap was printed for an anthropomorphic head phantom using a commercial vendor and a computed tomography simulation of the anthropomorphic head phantom and bolus cap was used to create a volumetric‐modulated arc therapy TSI treatment plan. The planned treatment was delivered to the head phantom and dosimetric validation was performed using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD). The developed procedure was used to create a bolus cap for a clinical TSI patient, and in vivo TLD measurements were acquired for several fractions. RESULTS: Agilus‐60 was validated as a new 3D‐printing material suitable for use as bolus. A 3D‐printed Agilus‐60 bolus cap had excellent conformality to the phantom scalp, with a maximum air gap of 4 mm. TLD measurements showed that the bolus cap generated a uniform dose to the scalp within a 2.7% standard deviation, and the delivered doses agreed with calculated doses to within 2.4% on average. The patient bolus was conformal and the average difference between TLD measured and planned doses was 5.3%. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a workflow to 3D‐print highly conformal bolus caps for TSI and demonstrated these caps can reproducibly generate a uniform dose to the scalp. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6414136 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64141362019-03-22 Development and validation of a 3D‐printed bolus cap for total scalp irradiation Baltz, Garrett C. Chi, Pai‐Chun Melinda Wong, Pei‐Fong Wang, Congjun Craft, Daniel F. Kry, Stephen F. Lin, Stacy Sydney Hsinyi Garden, Adam S. Smith, Susan A. Howell, Rebecca M. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: The goal of total scalp irradiation (TSI) is to deliver a uniform dose to the scalp, which requires the use of a bolus cap. Most current methods for fabricating bolus caps are laborious, yet still result in nonconformity and low reproducibility, which can lead to nonuniform irradiation of the scalp. We developed and validated patient‐specific bolus caps for TSI using three‐dimensional (3D) printing. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 3D‐printing materials were radiologically analyzed to identify a material with properties suitable for use as a bolus cap. A Python script was developed within a commercial treatment planning system to automate the creation of a ready‐to‐print, patient‐specific 3D bolus cap model. A bolus cap was printed for an anthropomorphic head phantom using a commercial vendor and a computed tomography simulation of the anthropomorphic head phantom and bolus cap was used to create a volumetric‐modulated arc therapy TSI treatment plan. The planned treatment was delivered to the head phantom and dosimetric validation was performed using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD). The developed procedure was used to create a bolus cap for a clinical TSI patient, and in vivo TLD measurements were acquired for several fractions. RESULTS: Agilus‐60 was validated as a new 3D‐printing material suitable for use as bolus. A 3D‐printed Agilus‐60 bolus cap had excellent conformality to the phantom scalp, with a maximum air gap of 4 mm. TLD measurements showed that the bolus cap generated a uniform dose to the scalp within a 2.7% standard deviation, and the delivered doses agreed with calculated doses to within 2.4% on average. The patient bolus was conformal and the average difference between TLD measured and planned doses was 5.3%. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a workflow to 3D‐print highly conformal bolus caps for TSI and demonstrated these caps can reproducibly generate a uniform dose to the scalp. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6414136/ /pubmed/30821903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12552 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Baltz, Garrett C. Chi, Pai‐Chun Melinda Wong, Pei‐Fong Wang, Congjun Craft, Daniel F. Kry, Stephen F. Lin, Stacy Sydney Hsinyi Garden, Adam S. Smith, Susan A. Howell, Rebecca M. Development and validation of a 3D‐printed bolus cap for total scalp irradiation |
title | Development and validation of a 3D‐printed bolus cap for total scalp irradiation |
title_full | Development and validation of a 3D‐printed bolus cap for total scalp irradiation |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of a 3D‐printed bolus cap for total scalp irradiation |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of a 3D‐printed bolus cap for total scalp irradiation |
title_short | Development and validation of a 3D‐printed bolus cap for total scalp irradiation |
title_sort | development and validation of a 3d‐printed bolus cap for total scalp irradiation |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6414136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30821903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12552 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baltzgarrettc developmentandvalidationofa3dprintedboluscapfortotalscalpirradiation AT chipaichunmelinda developmentandvalidationofa3dprintedboluscapfortotalscalpirradiation AT wongpeifong developmentandvalidationofa3dprintedboluscapfortotalscalpirradiation AT wangcongjun developmentandvalidationofa3dprintedboluscapfortotalscalpirradiation AT craftdanielf developmentandvalidationofa3dprintedboluscapfortotalscalpirradiation AT krystephenf developmentandvalidationofa3dprintedboluscapfortotalscalpirradiation AT linstacysydneyhsinyi developmentandvalidationofa3dprintedboluscapfortotalscalpirradiation AT gardenadams developmentandvalidationofa3dprintedboluscapfortotalscalpirradiation AT smithsusana developmentandvalidationofa3dprintedboluscapfortotalscalpirradiation AT howellrebeccam developmentandvalidationofa3dprintedboluscapfortotalscalpirradiation |