Cargando…

Improving fiducial and prostate capsule visualization for radiotherapy planning using MRI

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intraprostatic fiducial markers (FM) improve the accuracy of radiotherapy (RT) delivery. Here we assess geometric integrity and contouring consistency using a T2*‐weighted (T2*W) sequence alone, which allows visualization of the FM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients scanned...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pathmanathan, Angela U., Schmidt, Maria A., Brand, Douglas H., Kousi, Evanthia, van As, Nicholas J., Tree, Alison C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6414142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30756456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12529
_version_ 1783402934820667392
author Pathmanathan, Angela U.
Schmidt, Maria A.
Brand, Douglas H.
Kousi, Evanthia
van As, Nicholas J.
Tree, Alison C.
author_facet Pathmanathan, Angela U.
Schmidt, Maria A.
Brand, Douglas H.
Kousi, Evanthia
van As, Nicholas J.
Tree, Alison C.
author_sort Pathmanathan, Angela U.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intraprostatic fiducial markers (FM) improve the accuracy of radiotherapy (RT) delivery. Here we assess geometric integrity and contouring consistency using a T2*‐weighted (T2*W) sequence alone, which allows visualization of the FM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients scanned within the Prostate Advances in Comparative Evidence (PACE) trial (NCT01584258) had prostate images acquired with computed tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging: T2‐weighted (T2W) and T2*W sequences. The prostate was contoured independently on each imaging dataset by three clinicians. Interobserver variability was assessed using comparison indices with Monaco ADMIRE (research version 2.0, Elekta AB) and examined for statistical differences between imaging sets. CT and MR images of two test objects were acquired to assess geometric distortion and accuracy of marker positioning. The first was a linear test object comprising straight tubes in three orthogonal directions, the second was a smaller test object with markers suspended in gel. RESULTS: Interobserver variability for prostate contouring was lower for both T2W and T2*W compared to CT, this was statistically significant when comparing CT and T2*W images. All markers are visible in T2*W images with 29/30 correctly identified, only 3/30 are visible in T2W images. Assessment of geometric distortion revealed in‐plane displacements were under 0.375 mm in MRI, and through plane displacements could not be detected. The signal loss in the MR images is symmetric in relation to the true marker position shown in CT images. CONCLUSION: Prostate T2*W images are geometrically accurate, and yield consistent prostate contours. This single sequence can be used to identify FM and for prostate delineation in a mixed MR‐CT workflow.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6414142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64141422019-03-22 Improving fiducial and prostate capsule visualization for radiotherapy planning using MRI Pathmanathan, Angela U. Schmidt, Maria A. Brand, Douglas H. Kousi, Evanthia van As, Nicholas J. Tree, Alison C. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intraprostatic fiducial markers (FM) improve the accuracy of radiotherapy (RT) delivery. Here we assess geometric integrity and contouring consistency using a T2*‐weighted (T2*W) sequence alone, which allows visualization of the FM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients scanned within the Prostate Advances in Comparative Evidence (PACE) trial (NCT01584258) had prostate images acquired with computed tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging: T2‐weighted (T2W) and T2*W sequences. The prostate was contoured independently on each imaging dataset by three clinicians. Interobserver variability was assessed using comparison indices with Monaco ADMIRE (research version 2.0, Elekta AB) and examined for statistical differences between imaging sets. CT and MR images of two test objects were acquired to assess geometric distortion and accuracy of marker positioning. The first was a linear test object comprising straight tubes in three orthogonal directions, the second was a smaller test object with markers suspended in gel. RESULTS: Interobserver variability for prostate contouring was lower for both T2W and T2*W compared to CT, this was statistically significant when comparing CT and T2*W images. All markers are visible in T2*W images with 29/30 correctly identified, only 3/30 are visible in T2W images. Assessment of geometric distortion revealed in‐plane displacements were under 0.375 mm in MRI, and through plane displacements could not be detected. The signal loss in the MR images is symmetric in relation to the true marker position shown in CT images. CONCLUSION: Prostate T2*W images are geometrically accurate, and yield consistent prostate contours. This single sequence can be used to identify FM and for prostate delineation in a mixed MR‐CT workflow. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6414142/ /pubmed/30756456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12529 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Pathmanathan, Angela U.
Schmidt, Maria A.
Brand, Douglas H.
Kousi, Evanthia
van As, Nicholas J.
Tree, Alison C.
Improving fiducial and prostate capsule visualization for radiotherapy planning using MRI
title Improving fiducial and prostate capsule visualization for radiotherapy planning using MRI
title_full Improving fiducial and prostate capsule visualization for radiotherapy planning using MRI
title_fullStr Improving fiducial and prostate capsule visualization for radiotherapy planning using MRI
title_full_unstemmed Improving fiducial and prostate capsule visualization for radiotherapy planning using MRI
title_short Improving fiducial and prostate capsule visualization for radiotherapy planning using MRI
title_sort improving fiducial and prostate capsule visualization for radiotherapy planning using mri
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6414142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30756456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12529
work_keys_str_mv AT pathmanathanangelau improvingfiducialandprostatecapsulevisualizationforradiotherapyplanningusingmri
AT schmidtmariaa improvingfiducialandprostatecapsulevisualizationforradiotherapyplanningusingmri
AT branddouglash improvingfiducialandprostatecapsulevisualizationforradiotherapyplanningusingmri
AT kousievanthia improvingfiducialandprostatecapsulevisualizationforradiotherapyplanningusingmri
AT vanasnicholasj improvingfiducialandprostatecapsulevisualizationforradiotherapyplanningusingmri
AT treealisonc improvingfiducialandprostatecapsulevisualizationforradiotherapyplanningusingmri