Cargando…

AlignRT(®) and Catalyst™ in whole‐breast radiotherapy with DIBH: Is IGRT still needed?

PURPOSE: Surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) is reported as a feasible setup technique for whole‐breast radiotherapy in deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH), but position errors of bony structures related to deeper parts of the target are not fully known. The aim of this study was to estimate patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laaksomaa, Marko, Sarudis, Sebastian, Rossi, Maija, Lehtonen, Turkka, Pehkonen, Jani, Remes, Jenny, Luukkanen, Helmi, Skyttä, Tanja, Kapanen, Mika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6414178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30861276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12553
_version_ 1783402943024726016
author Laaksomaa, Marko
Sarudis, Sebastian
Rossi, Maija
Lehtonen, Turkka
Pehkonen, Jani
Remes, Jenny
Luukkanen, Helmi
Skyttä, Tanja
Kapanen, Mika
author_facet Laaksomaa, Marko
Sarudis, Sebastian
Rossi, Maija
Lehtonen, Turkka
Pehkonen, Jani
Remes, Jenny
Luukkanen, Helmi
Skyttä, Tanja
Kapanen, Mika
author_sort Laaksomaa, Marko
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) is reported as a feasible setup technique for whole‐breast radiotherapy in deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH), but position errors of bony structures related to deeper parts of the target are not fully known. The aim of this study was to estimate patient setup accuracy and margins obtained with two different SGRT workflows with and without daily kV‐ and/or MV‐based image guidance (IGRT). METHODS: A total of 50 breast cancer patients were treated in DIBH, using SGRT for the patient setup, and IGRT for isocenter corrections. The patients were treated at two different departments, one using AlignRT(®) (25 patients) and the other using Catalyst™ (25 patients). Inter‐fractional position errors were analyzed retrospectively in orthogonal and tangential setup images, and analyzed with and without IGRT. RESULTS: In the orthogonal kV‐kV images, the systematic residual errors of the bony structures were ≤ 3 mm in both groups with SGRT‐only. When fine‐adjusted by daily IGRT, the errors decreased to ≤ 2 mm; except for the shoulder joint. The residual errors of the ribs in tangential images were between 1 and 2 mm with both workflows. The heart planning margins were between 3 and 7 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of IGRT may be considerably reduced with a well‐planned SGRT‐workflow for whole‐breast DIBH with residual errors ≤ 3 mm. This accuracy can be further improved with an IGRT scheme.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6414178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64141782019-03-22 AlignRT(®) and Catalyst™ in whole‐breast radiotherapy with DIBH: Is IGRT still needed? Laaksomaa, Marko Sarudis, Sebastian Rossi, Maija Lehtonen, Turkka Pehkonen, Jani Remes, Jenny Luukkanen, Helmi Skyttä, Tanja Kapanen, Mika J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: Surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) is reported as a feasible setup technique for whole‐breast radiotherapy in deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH), but position errors of bony structures related to deeper parts of the target are not fully known. The aim of this study was to estimate patient setup accuracy and margins obtained with two different SGRT workflows with and without daily kV‐ and/or MV‐based image guidance (IGRT). METHODS: A total of 50 breast cancer patients were treated in DIBH, using SGRT for the patient setup, and IGRT for isocenter corrections. The patients were treated at two different departments, one using AlignRT(®) (25 patients) and the other using Catalyst™ (25 patients). Inter‐fractional position errors were analyzed retrospectively in orthogonal and tangential setup images, and analyzed with and without IGRT. RESULTS: In the orthogonal kV‐kV images, the systematic residual errors of the bony structures were ≤ 3 mm in both groups with SGRT‐only. When fine‐adjusted by daily IGRT, the errors decreased to ≤ 2 mm; except for the shoulder joint. The residual errors of the ribs in tangential images were between 1 and 2 mm with both workflows. The heart planning margins were between 3 and 7 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of IGRT may be considerably reduced with a well‐planned SGRT‐workflow for whole‐breast DIBH with residual errors ≤ 3 mm. This accuracy can be further improved with an IGRT scheme. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6414178/ /pubmed/30861276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12553 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Laaksomaa, Marko
Sarudis, Sebastian
Rossi, Maija
Lehtonen, Turkka
Pehkonen, Jani
Remes, Jenny
Luukkanen, Helmi
Skyttä, Tanja
Kapanen, Mika
AlignRT(®) and Catalyst™ in whole‐breast radiotherapy with DIBH: Is IGRT still needed?
title AlignRT(®) and Catalyst™ in whole‐breast radiotherapy with DIBH: Is IGRT still needed?
title_full AlignRT(®) and Catalyst™ in whole‐breast radiotherapy with DIBH: Is IGRT still needed?
title_fullStr AlignRT(®) and Catalyst™ in whole‐breast radiotherapy with DIBH: Is IGRT still needed?
title_full_unstemmed AlignRT(®) and Catalyst™ in whole‐breast radiotherapy with DIBH: Is IGRT still needed?
title_short AlignRT(®) and Catalyst™ in whole‐breast radiotherapy with DIBH: Is IGRT still needed?
title_sort alignrt(®) and catalyst™ in whole‐breast radiotherapy with dibh: is igrt still needed?
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6414178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30861276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12553
work_keys_str_mv AT laaksomaamarko alignrtandcatalystinwholebreastradiotherapywithdibhisigrtstillneeded
AT sarudissebastian alignrtandcatalystinwholebreastradiotherapywithdibhisigrtstillneeded
AT rossimaija alignrtandcatalystinwholebreastradiotherapywithdibhisigrtstillneeded
AT lehtonenturkka alignrtandcatalystinwholebreastradiotherapywithdibhisigrtstillneeded
AT pehkonenjani alignrtandcatalystinwholebreastradiotherapywithdibhisigrtstillneeded
AT remesjenny alignrtandcatalystinwholebreastradiotherapywithdibhisigrtstillneeded
AT luukkanenhelmi alignrtandcatalystinwholebreastradiotherapywithdibhisigrtstillneeded
AT skyttatanja alignrtandcatalystinwholebreastradiotherapywithdibhisigrtstillneeded
AT kapanenmika alignrtandcatalystinwholebreastradiotherapywithdibhisigrtstillneeded