Cargando…

Assessing Mucoadhesion in Polymer Gels: The Effect of Method Type and Instrument Variables

The process of mucoadhesion has been widely studied using a wide variety of methods, which are influenced by instrumental variables and experiment design, making the comparison between the results of different studies difficult. The aim of this work was to standardize the conditions of the detachmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bassi da Silva, Jéssica, Ferreira, Sabrina Barbosa de Souza, Reis, Adriano Valim, Cook, Michael Thomas, Bruschi, Marcos Luciano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6415125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30966289
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym10030254
_version_ 1783403118742994944
author Bassi da Silva, Jéssica
Ferreira, Sabrina Barbosa de Souza
Reis, Adriano Valim
Cook, Michael Thomas
Bruschi, Marcos Luciano
author_facet Bassi da Silva, Jéssica
Ferreira, Sabrina Barbosa de Souza
Reis, Adriano Valim
Cook, Michael Thomas
Bruschi, Marcos Luciano
author_sort Bassi da Silva, Jéssica
collection PubMed
description The process of mucoadhesion has been widely studied using a wide variety of methods, which are influenced by instrumental variables and experiment design, making the comparison between the results of different studies difficult. The aim of this work was to standardize the conditions of the detachment test and the rheological methods of mucoadhesion assessment for semisolids, and introduce a texture profile analysis (TPA) method. A factorial design was developed to suggest standard conditions for performing the detachment force method. To evaluate the method, binary polymeric systems were prepared containing poloxamer 407 and Carbopol 971P(®), Carbopol 974P(®), or Noveon(®) Polycarbophil. The mucoadhesion of systems was evaluated, and the reproducibility of these measurements investigated. This detachment force method was demonstrated to be reproduceable, and gave different adhesion when mucin disk or ex vivo oral mucosa was used. The factorial design demonstrated that all evaluated parameters had an effect on measurements of mucoadhesive force, but the same was not observed for the work of adhesion. It was suggested that the work of adhesion is a more appropriate metric for evaluating mucoadhesion. Oscillatory rheology was more capable of investigating adhesive interactions than flow rheology. TPA method was demonstrated to be reproducible and can evaluate the adhesiveness interaction parameter. This investigation demonstrates the need for standardized methods to evaluate mucoadhesion and makes suggestions for a standard study design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6415125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64151252019-04-02 Assessing Mucoadhesion in Polymer Gels: The Effect of Method Type and Instrument Variables Bassi da Silva, Jéssica Ferreira, Sabrina Barbosa de Souza Reis, Adriano Valim Cook, Michael Thomas Bruschi, Marcos Luciano Polymers (Basel) Article The process of mucoadhesion has been widely studied using a wide variety of methods, which are influenced by instrumental variables and experiment design, making the comparison between the results of different studies difficult. The aim of this work was to standardize the conditions of the detachment test and the rheological methods of mucoadhesion assessment for semisolids, and introduce a texture profile analysis (TPA) method. A factorial design was developed to suggest standard conditions for performing the detachment force method. To evaluate the method, binary polymeric systems were prepared containing poloxamer 407 and Carbopol 971P(®), Carbopol 974P(®), or Noveon(®) Polycarbophil. The mucoadhesion of systems was evaluated, and the reproducibility of these measurements investigated. This detachment force method was demonstrated to be reproduceable, and gave different adhesion when mucin disk or ex vivo oral mucosa was used. The factorial design demonstrated that all evaluated parameters had an effect on measurements of mucoadhesive force, but the same was not observed for the work of adhesion. It was suggested that the work of adhesion is a more appropriate metric for evaluating mucoadhesion. Oscillatory rheology was more capable of investigating adhesive interactions than flow rheology. TPA method was demonstrated to be reproducible and can evaluate the adhesiveness interaction parameter. This investigation demonstrates the need for standardized methods to evaluate mucoadhesion and makes suggestions for a standard study design. MDPI 2018-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6415125/ /pubmed/30966289 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym10030254 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bassi da Silva, Jéssica
Ferreira, Sabrina Barbosa de Souza
Reis, Adriano Valim
Cook, Michael Thomas
Bruschi, Marcos Luciano
Assessing Mucoadhesion in Polymer Gels: The Effect of Method Type and Instrument Variables
title Assessing Mucoadhesion in Polymer Gels: The Effect of Method Type and Instrument Variables
title_full Assessing Mucoadhesion in Polymer Gels: The Effect of Method Type and Instrument Variables
title_fullStr Assessing Mucoadhesion in Polymer Gels: The Effect of Method Type and Instrument Variables
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Mucoadhesion in Polymer Gels: The Effect of Method Type and Instrument Variables
title_short Assessing Mucoadhesion in Polymer Gels: The Effect of Method Type and Instrument Variables
title_sort assessing mucoadhesion in polymer gels: the effect of method type and instrument variables
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6415125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30966289
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym10030254
work_keys_str_mv AT bassidasilvajessica assessingmucoadhesioninpolymergelstheeffectofmethodtypeandinstrumentvariables
AT ferreirasabrinabarbosadesouza assessingmucoadhesioninpolymergelstheeffectofmethodtypeandinstrumentvariables
AT reisadrianovalim assessingmucoadhesioninpolymergelstheeffectofmethodtypeandinstrumentvariables
AT cookmichaelthomas assessingmucoadhesioninpolymergelstheeffectofmethodtypeandinstrumentvariables
AT bruschimarcosluciano assessingmucoadhesioninpolymergelstheeffectofmethodtypeandinstrumentvariables