Cargando…
A descriptive analysis of the characteristics and the peer review process of systematic review protocols published in an open peer review journal from 2012 to 2017
BACKGROUND: An a priori design is essential to reduce the risk of bias in systematic reviews (SRs). To this end, authors can register their SR with PROSPERO, and/or publish a SR protocol in an academic journal. The latter has the advantage that the manuscript for the SR protocol is usually peer-revi...
Autores principales: | Rombey, Tanja, Allers, Katharina, Mathes, Tim, Hoffmann, Falk, Pieper, Dawid |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6415341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30866832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0698-8 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Restrictions and their reporting in systematic reviews of effectiveness: an observational study
por: Helbach, Jasmin, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Thank you to Virology Journal’s peer reviewers in 2012
por: Wang, Linfa
Publicado: (2013) -
Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals
por: Gasparyan, Armen Yuri, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Appreciations to Peer Reviewers for Journal of Korean Medical Science 2017
por: Hong, Sung-Tae
Publicado: (2018)