Cargando…

Influence of urban river restoration on nitrogen dynamics at the sediment-water interface

River restoration projects focused on altering flow regimes through use of in-channel structures can facilitate ecosystem services, such as promoting nitrogen (N) storage to reduce eutrophication. In this study we use small flux chambers to examine ammonium (NH(4)(+)) and nitrate (NO(3)(-)) cycling...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lavelle, Anna M., Bury, Nic R., O’Shea, Francis T., Chadwick, Michael A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6415882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30865649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212690
_version_ 1783403253565751296
author Lavelle, Anna M.
Bury, Nic R.
O’Shea, Francis T.
Chadwick, Michael A.
author_facet Lavelle, Anna M.
Bury, Nic R.
O’Shea, Francis T.
Chadwick, Michael A.
author_sort Lavelle, Anna M.
collection PubMed
description River restoration projects focused on altering flow regimes through use of in-channel structures can facilitate ecosystem services, such as promoting nitrogen (N) storage to reduce eutrophication. In this study we use small flux chambers to examine ammonium (NH(4)(+)) and nitrate (NO(3)(-)) cycling across the sediment-water interface. Paired restored and unrestored study sites in 5 urban tributaries of the River Thames in Greater London were used to examine N dynamics following physical disturbances (0–3 min exposures) and subsequent biogeochemical activity (3–10 min exposures). Average ambient NH(4)(+) concentrations were significantly different amongst all sites and ranged from 28.0 to 731.7 μg L(-1), with the highest concentrations measured at restored sites. Average NO(3)(-) concentrations ranged from 9.6 to 26.4 mg L(-1), but did not significantly differ between restored and unrestored sites. Average NH(4)(+) fluxes at restored sites ranged from -8.9 to 5.0 μg N m(-2) sec(-1), however restoration did not significantly influence NH(4)(+) uptake or regeneration (i.e., a measure of release to surface water) between 0–3 minutes and 3–10 minutes. Further, average NO(3)(-) fluxes amongst sites responded significantly between 0–3 minutes ranging from -33.6 to 97.7 μg N m(-2) sec(-1). Neither NH(4)(+) nor NO(3)(-) fluxes correlated to sediment chlorophyll-a, total organic matter, or grain size. We attributed variations in overall N fluxes to N-specific sediment storage capacity, biogeochemical transformations, potential legacy effects associated with urban pollution, and variations in river-specific restoration actions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6415882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64158822019-04-02 Influence of urban river restoration on nitrogen dynamics at the sediment-water interface Lavelle, Anna M. Bury, Nic R. O’Shea, Francis T. Chadwick, Michael A. PLoS One Research Article River restoration projects focused on altering flow regimes through use of in-channel structures can facilitate ecosystem services, such as promoting nitrogen (N) storage to reduce eutrophication. In this study we use small flux chambers to examine ammonium (NH(4)(+)) and nitrate (NO(3)(-)) cycling across the sediment-water interface. Paired restored and unrestored study sites in 5 urban tributaries of the River Thames in Greater London were used to examine N dynamics following physical disturbances (0–3 min exposures) and subsequent biogeochemical activity (3–10 min exposures). Average ambient NH(4)(+) concentrations were significantly different amongst all sites and ranged from 28.0 to 731.7 μg L(-1), with the highest concentrations measured at restored sites. Average NO(3)(-) concentrations ranged from 9.6 to 26.4 mg L(-1), but did not significantly differ between restored and unrestored sites. Average NH(4)(+) fluxes at restored sites ranged from -8.9 to 5.0 μg N m(-2) sec(-1), however restoration did not significantly influence NH(4)(+) uptake or regeneration (i.e., a measure of release to surface water) between 0–3 minutes and 3–10 minutes. Further, average NO(3)(-) fluxes amongst sites responded significantly between 0–3 minutes ranging from -33.6 to 97.7 μg N m(-2) sec(-1). Neither NH(4)(+) nor NO(3)(-) fluxes correlated to sediment chlorophyll-a, total organic matter, or grain size. We attributed variations in overall N fluxes to N-specific sediment storage capacity, biogeochemical transformations, potential legacy effects associated with urban pollution, and variations in river-specific restoration actions. Public Library of Science 2019-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6415882/ /pubmed/30865649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212690 Text en © 2019 Lavelle et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lavelle, Anna M.
Bury, Nic R.
O’Shea, Francis T.
Chadwick, Michael A.
Influence of urban river restoration on nitrogen dynamics at the sediment-water interface
title Influence of urban river restoration on nitrogen dynamics at the sediment-water interface
title_full Influence of urban river restoration on nitrogen dynamics at the sediment-water interface
title_fullStr Influence of urban river restoration on nitrogen dynamics at the sediment-water interface
title_full_unstemmed Influence of urban river restoration on nitrogen dynamics at the sediment-water interface
title_short Influence of urban river restoration on nitrogen dynamics at the sediment-water interface
title_sort influence of urban river restoration on nitrogen dynamics at the sediment-water interface
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6415882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30865649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212690
work_keys_str_mv AT lavelleannam influenceofurbanriverrestorationonnitrogendynamicsatthesedimentwaterinterface
AT burynicr influenceofurbanriverrestorationonnitrogendynamicsatthesedimentwaterinterface
AT osheafrancist influenceofurbanriverrestorationonnitrogendynamicsatthesedimentwaterinterface
AT chadwickmichaela influenceofurbanriverrestorationonnitrogendynamicsatthesedimentwaterinterface