Cargando…
Influence of urban river restoration on nitrogen dynamics at the sediment-water interface
River restoration projects focused on altering flow regimes through use of in-channel structures can facilitate ecosystem services, such as promoting nitrogen (N) storage to reduce eutrophication. In this study we use small flux chambers to examine ammonium (NH(4)(+)) and nitrate (NO(3)(-)) cycling...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6415882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30865649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212690 |
_version_ | 1783403253565751296 |
---|---|
author | Lavelle, Anna M. Bury, Nic R. O’Shea, Francis T. Chadwick, Michael A. |
author_facet | Lavelle, Anna M. Bury, Nic R. O’Shea, Francis T. Chadwick, Michael A. |
author_sort | Lavelle, Anna M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | River restoration projects focused on altering flow regimes through use of in-channel structures can facilitate ecosystem services, such as promoting nitrogen (N) storage to reduce eutrophication. In this study we use small flux chambers to examine ammonium (NH(4)(+)) and nitrate (NO(3)(-)) cycling across the sediment-water interface. Paired restored and unrestored study sites in 5 urban tributaries of the River Thames in Greater London were used to examine N dynamics following physical disturbances (0–3 min exposures) and subsequent biogeochemical activity (3–10 min exposures). Average ambient NH(4)(+) concentrations were significantly different amongst all sites and ranged from 28.0 to 731.7 μg L(-1), with the highest concentrations measured at restored sites. Average NO(3)(-) concentrations ranged from 9.6 to 26.4 mg L(-1), but did not significantly differ between restored and unrestored sites. Average NH(4)(+) fluxes at restored sites ranged from -8.9 to 5.0 μg N m(-2) sec(-1), however restoration did not significantly influence NH(4)(+) uptake or regeneration (i.e., a measure of release to surface water) between 0–3 minutes and 3–10 minutes. Further, average NO(3)(-) fluxes amongst sites responded significantly between 0–3 minutes ranging from -33.6 to 97.7 μg N m(-2) sec(-1). Neither NH(4)(+) nor NO(3)(-) fluxes correlated to sediment chlorophyll-a, total organic matter, or grain size. We attributed variations in overall N fluxes to N-specific sediment storage capacity, biogeochemical transformations, potential legacy effects associated with urban pollution, and variations in river-specific restoration actions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6415882 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64158822019-04-02 Influence of urban river restoration on nitrogen dynamics at the sediment-water interface Lavelle, Anna M. Bury, Nic R. O’Shea, Francis T. Chadwick, Michael A. PLoS One Research Article River restoration projects focused on altering flow regimes through use of in-channel structures can facilitate ecosystem services, such as promoting nitrogen (N) storage to reduce eutrophication. In this study we use small flux chambers to examine ammonium (NH(4)(+)) and nitrate (NO(3)(-)) cycling across the sediment-water interface. Paired restored and unrestored study sites in 5 urban tributaries of the River Thames in Greater London were used to examine N dynamics following physical disturbances (0–3 min exposures) and subsequent biogeochemical activity (3–10 min exposures). Average ambient NH(4)(+) concentrations were significantly different amongst all sites and ranged from 28.0 to 731.7 μg L(-1), with the highest concentrations measured at restored sites. Average NO(3)(-) concentrations ranged from 9.6 to 26.4 mg L(-1), but did not significantly differ between restored and unrestored sites. Average NH(4)(+) fluxes at restored sites ranged from -8.9 to 5.0 μg N m(-2) sec(-1), however restoration did not significantly influence NH(4)(+) uptake or regeneration (i.e., a measure of release to surface water) between 0–3 minutes and 3–10 minutes. Further, average NO(3)(-) fluxes amongst sites responded significantly between 0–3 minutes ranging from -33.6 to 97.7 μg N m(-2) sec(-1). Neither NH(4)(+) nor NO(3)(-) fluxes correlated to sediment chlorophyll-a, total organic matter, or grain size. We attributed variations in overall N fluxes to N-specific sediment storage capacity, biogeochemical transformations, potential legacy effects associated with urban pollution, and variations in river-specific restoration actions. Public Library of Science 2019-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6415882/ /pubmed/30865649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212690 Text en © 2019 Lavelle et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lavelle, Anna M. Bury, Nic R. O’Shea, Francis T. Chadwick, Michael A. Influence of urban river restoration on nitrogen dynamics at the sediment-water interface |
title | Influence of urban river restoration on nitrogen dynamics at the sediment-water interface |
title_full | Influence of urban river restoration on nitrogen dynamics at the sediment-water interface |
title_fullStr | Influence of urban river restoration on nitrogen dynamics at the sediment-water interface |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of urban river restoration on nitrogen dynamics at the sediment-water interface |
title_short | Influence of urban river restoration on nitrogen dynamics at the sediment-water interface |
title_sort | influence of urban river restoration on nitrogen dynamics at the sediment-water interface |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6415882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30865649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212690 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lavelleannam influenceofurbanriverrestorationonnitrogendynamicsatthesedimentwaterinterface AT burynicr influenceofurbanriverrestorationonnitrogendynamicsatthesedimentwaterinterface AT osheafrancist influenceofurbanriverrestorationonnitrogendynamicsatthesedimentwaterinterface AT chadwickmichaela influenceofurbanriverrestorationonnitrogendynamicsatthesedimentwaterinterface |