Cargando…
New debate of revascularization strategy of non-infarct-related artery lesions in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: decoding the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial, not enough to challenge the current guidelines
Autores principales: | Song, Fang, Wu, Qiang, Chen, Xiao-Ping |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6415997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30807360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000112 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Multiple culprit lesions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: a case of simultaneous thrombosis of two infarct-related arteries
por: Caliskan, R., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Cardiogenic shock due to left main related myocardial infarction: is revascularization enough?
por: Galván-Román, Francisco, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Multivessel vs. culprit vessel-only percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with and without cardiogenic shock
por: Wu, Jing, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Target Vessel Versus Complete Revascularization in Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Without Cardiogenic Shock
por: Pandit, Neeraj, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
When to Achieve Complete Revascularization in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock
por: Masiero, Giulia, et al.
Publicado: (2022)