Cargando…

The Incidence of Chiari Malformations in Patients with Isolated Sagittal Synostosis

BACKGROUND: We report the incidence of Chiari malformation I (CMI) in a cohort of 377 patients with isolated sagittal synostosis (ISS), which is to the best of our knowledge the largest such series reported to date. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients seen at a single institution from 2007 t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davis, Amani Ali, Zuccoli, Giulio, Haredy, Mostafa M., Runkel, Lauren, Losee, Joseph, Pollack, Ian F., Tamber, Mandeep S., Tyler-Kabara, Elizabeth, Goldstein, Jesse A., Nischal, Ken-K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6416108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002090
_version_ 1783403283832897536
author Davis, Amani Ali
Zuccoli, Giulio
Haredy, Mostafa M.
Runkel, Lauren
Losee, Joseph
Pollack, Ian F.
Tamber, Mandeep S.
Tyler-Kabara, Elizabeth
Goldstein, Jesse A.
Nischal, Ken-K
author_facet Davis, Amani Ali
Zuccoli, Giulio
Haredy, Mostafa M.
Runkel, Lauren
Losee, Joseph
Pollack, Ian F.
Tamber, Mandeep S.
Tyler-Kabara, Elizabeth
Goldstein, Jesse A.
Nischal, Ken-K
author_sort Davis, Amani Ali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We report the incidence of Chiari malformation I (CMI) in a cohort of 377 patients with isolated sagittal synostosis (ISS), which is to the best of our knowledge the largest such series reported to date. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients seen at a single institution from 2007 to 2017 was completed. ISS, Chiari malformations (CMI and CMII) and hydrocephalus were diagnosed by a senior neuroradiologist (G.Z.). Patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into early (group A) and late (group B) presenting groups, as well as operated (group I) and unoperated (group II) groups. The patients were further subdivided into group AI (early operated), group AII (early unoperated), group BI (late operated), and group BII (late unoperated). Once identified, patient notes were examined for the following data sets: date of birth, age of presentation, age at last follow-up, other systemic conditions as well as molecular testing results. Surgical interventions, ophthalmological, and other relevant data were recorded. Statistical analysis was run in the form of a chi-square test to identify a significant difference between each subgroup. A literature review of the incidence of Chiari malformations in patients with ISS was conducted. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-seven patients constitute the study’s total cohort (272 were males and 105 females). This cohort was divided into patients who underwent surgical repair of ISS (group 1: n = 200), and patients who did not (group 2: n = 177). The entire cohort was also divided into early (group A: n = 161) and late (group B: n = 216) presenting craniosynostosis. In the total cohort, 22/377 (5.8%) patients with CMI were identified. CMI was found in 14/200 (7.0%) patients in group I, and 8/177 (4.5%) patients in group II. CMI was found in 2/161 (1%) patients in group A, and 20/216 (9.2%) patients in group B. The incidence of CMI in group AI (early operated) was 2/151 (1.3%), in group AII (early unoperated) was 0/10, in group BI (late operated) was 11/49 (21%), and in group BII (late unoperated) was 9/167 (5.4%). Chi-square analysis revealed a significant difference between the incidence of CMI in the early-presenting (group A) and late-presenting (group B) groups (P = 0.001) and between the late-presenting operated (BI) and late-presenting unoperated (BII) groups (P = 0.001). The incidence of hydrocephalus was 1.6% (6/377) in the total cohort. However, all patients diagnosed with hydrocephalus came from group II (no surgical ISS correction). The incidence of hydrocephalus in group II was 3.3% (6/177). The incidence of hydrocephalus in group BII (late unoperated ISS) was 3.0% (5/167). The incidence of hydrocephalus in group AII (early unoperated ISS) was 9.0% (1/11). CONCLUSIONS: We noted the highest incidence of CMI—21%—in group BI (late-presenting operated). We noted hydrocephalus in group II (nonoperated), with the highest incidence of hydrocephalus found in the group BII (late-presenting unoperated) subgroup. We therefore recommend patients with ISS receive funduscopic examination to screen for raised intracranial pressure (ICP) associated with CMI and hydrocephalus, especially patients with late-presenting ISS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6416108
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64161082019-03-16 The Incidence of Chiari Malformations in Patients with Isolated Sagittal Synostosis Davis, Amani Ali Zuccoli, Giulio Haredy, Mostafa M. Runkel, Lauren Losee, Joseph Pollack, Ian F. Tamber, Mandeep S. Tyler-Kabara, Elizabeth Goldstein, Jesse A. Nischal, Ken-K Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: We report the incidence of Chiari malformation I (CMI) in a cohort of 377 patients with isolated sagittal synostosis (ISS), which is to the best of our knowledge the largest such series reported to date. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients seen at a single institution from 2007 to 2017 was completed. ISS, Chiari malformations (CMI and CMII) and hydrocephalus were diagnosed by a senior neuroradiologist (G.Z.). Patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into early (group A) and late (group B) presenting groups, as well as operated (group I) and unoperated (group II) groups. The patients were further subdivided into group AI (early operated), group AII (early unoperated), group BI (late operated), and group BII (late unoperated). Once identified, patient notes were examined for the following data sets: date of birth, age of presentation, age at last follow-up, other systemic conditions as well as molecular testing results. Surgical interventions, ophthalmological, and other relevant data were recorded. Statistical analysis was run in the form of a chi-square test to identify a significant difference between each subgroup. A literature review of the incidence of Chiari malformations in patients with ISS was conducted. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-seven patients constitute the study’s total cohort (272 were males and 105 females). This cohort was divided into patients who underwent surgical repair of ISS (group 1: n = 200), and patients who did not (group 2: n = 177). The entire cohort was also divided into early (group A: n = 161) and late (group B: n = 216) presenting craniosynostosis. In the total cohort, 22/377 (5.8%) patients with CMI were identified. CMI was found in 14/200 (7.0%) patients in group I, and 8/177 (4.5%) patients in group II. CMI was found in 2/161 (1%) patients in group A, and 20/216 (9.2%) patients in group B. The incidence of CMI in group AI (early operated) was 2/151 (1.3%), in group AII (early unoperated) was 0/10, in group BI (late operated) was 11/49 (21%), and in group BII (late unoperated) was 9/167 (5.4%). Chi-square analysis revealed a significant difference between the incidence of CMI in the early-presenting (group A) and late-presenting (group B) groups (P = 0.001) and between the late-presenting operated (BI) and late-presenting unoperated (BII) groups (P = 0.001). The incidence of hydrocephalus was 1.6% (6/377) in the total cohort. However, all patients diagnosed with hydrocephalus came from group II (no surgical ISS correction). The incidence of hydrocephalus in group II was 3.3% (6/177). The incidence of hydrocephalus in group BII (late unoperated ISS) was 3.0% (5/167). The incidence of hydrocephalus in group AII (early unoperated ISS) was 9.0% (1/11). CONCLUSIONS: We noted the highest incidence of CMI—21%—in group BI (late-presenting operated). We noted hydrocephalus in group II (nonoperated), with the highest incidence of hydrocephalus found in the group BII (late-presenting unoperated) subgroup. We therefore recommend patients with ISS receive funduscopic examination to screen for raised intracranial pressure (ICP) associated with CMI and hydrocephalus, especially patients with late-presenting ISS. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6416108/ /pubmed/30881832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002090 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Davis, Amani Ali
Zuccoli, Giulio
Haredy, Mostafa M.
Runkel, Lauren
Losee, Joseph
Pollack, Ian F.
Tamber, Mandeep S.
Tyler-Kabara, Elizabeth
Goldstein, Jesse A.
Nischal, Ken-K
The Incidence of Chiari Malformations in Patients with Isolated Sagittal Synostosis
title The Incidence of Chiari Malformations in Patients with Isolated Sagittal Synostosis
title_full The Incidence of Chiari Malformations in Patients with Isolated Sagittal Synostosis
title_fullStr The Incidence of Chiari Malformations in Patients with Isolated Sagittal Synostosis
title_full_unstemmed The Incidence of Chiari Malformations in Patients with Isolated Sagittal Synostosis
title_short The Incidence of Chiari Malformations in Patients with Isolated Sagittal Synostosis
title_sort incidence of chiari malformations in patients with isolated sagittal synostosis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6416108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002090
work_keys_str_mv AT davisamaniali theincidenceofchiarimalformationsinpatientswithisolatedsagittalsynostosis
AT zuccoligiulio theincidenceofchiarimalformationsinpatientswithisolatedsagittalsynostosis
AT haredymostafam theincidenceofchiarimalformationsinpatientswithisolatedsagittalsynostosis
AT runkellauren theincidenceofchiarimalformationsinpatientswithisolatedsagittalsynostosis
AT loseejoseph theincidenceofchiarimalformationsinpatientswithisolatedsagittalsynostosis
AT pollackianf theincidenceofchiarimalformationsinpatientswithisolatedsagittalsynostosis
AT tambermandeeps theincidenceofchiarimalformationsinpatientswithisolatedsagittalsynostosis
AT tylerkabaraelizabeth theincidenceofchiarimalformationsinpatientswithisolatedsagittalsynostosis
AT goldsteinjessea theincidenceofchiarimalformationsinpatientswithisolatedsagittalsynostosis
AT nischalkenk theincidenceofchiarimalformationsinpatientswithisolatedsagittalsynostosis
AT davisamaniali incidenceofchiarimalformationsinpatientswithisolatedsagittalsynostosis
AT zuccoligiulio incidenceofchiarimalformationsinpatientswithisolatedsagittalsynostosis
AT haredymostafam incidenceofchiarimalformationsinpatientswithisolatedsagittalsynostosis
AT runkellauren incidenceofchiarimalformationsinpatientswithisolatedsagittalsynostosis
AT loseejoseph incidenceofchiarimalformationsinpatientswithisolatedsagittalsynostosis
AT pollackianf incidenceofchiarimalformationsinpatientswithisolatedsagittalsynostosis
AT tambermandeeps incidenceofchiarimalformationsinpatientswithisolatedsagittalsynostosis
AT tylerkabaraelizabeth incidenceofchiarimalformationsinpatientswithisolatedsagittalsynostosis
AT goldsteinjessea incidenceofchiarimalformationsinpatientswithisolatedsagittalsynostosis
AT nischalkenk incidenceofchiarimalformationsinpatientswithisolatedsagittalsynostosis