Cargando…

Upper-body Wingate test classificatory table for adult judo athletes

The aims of this study were to compare the upper-body Wingate test performance of judo athletes from different weight categories and to create a classificatory table for this test. A total of 179 judo athletes performed an upper-body Wingate test, following standardized recommendations (30-sec durat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Franchini, Emerson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Exercise Rehabilitation 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6416509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30899737
http://dx.doi.org/10.12965/jer.1836520.260
_version_ 1783403368435154944
author Franchini, Emerson
author_facet Franchini, Emerson
author_sort Franchini, Emerson
collection PubMed
description The aims of this study were to compare the upper-body Wingate test performance of judo athletes from different weight categories and to create a classificatory table for this test. A total of 179 judo athletes performed an upper-body Wingate test, following standardized recommendations (30-sec duration, and a load equivalent to 0.06 kg/kg of body mass). Absolute and relative peak power (PP) and mean power (MP) were determined. Weight categories were compared through a one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey test. The effect size was determined by partial eta squared. There was a large effect of weight category in absolute PP and MP, with lower values for the lighter categories (P<0.05), but it is important to note that absolute PP and MP did not differ (P>0.05) between subsequent weight categories. Moreover, when the relative PP and MP were considered, no significant differences were found (P>0.05). The higher values of PP and MP achieved by heavier judo athletes compared to lighter ones during the upper-body Wingate test is likely related to the higher total muscle mass presented by the first group compared to the later. Indeed, judo athletes from different weight category presented similar relative PP and MP, likely due to the judo training demands as well as consequence of a selection of athletes with the higher potential to develop upper-body anaerobic fitness. Finally, the normative classificatory table created may be useful as a reference in judo athletes’ anaerobic evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6416509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Korean Society of Exercise Rehabilitation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64165092019-03-21 Upper-body Wingate test classificatory table for adult judo athletes Franchini, Emerson J Exerc Rehabil Original Article The aims of this study were to compare the upper-body Wingate test performance of judo athletes from different weight categories and to create a classificatory table for this test. A total of 179 judo athletes performed an upper-body Wingate test, following standardized recommendations (30-sec duration, and a load equivalent to 0.06 kg/kg of body mass). Absolute and relative peak power (PP) and mean power (MP) were determined. Weight categories were compared through a one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey test. The effect size was determined by partial eta squared. There was a large effect of weight category in absolute PP and MP, with lower values for the lighter categories (P<0.05), but it is important to note that absolute PP and MP did not differ (P>0.05) between subsequent weight categories. Moreover, when the relative PP and MP were considered, no significant differences were found (P>0.05). The higher values of PP and MP achieved by heavier judo athletes compared to lighter ones during the upper-body Wingate test is likely related to the higher total muscle mass presented by the first group compared to the later. Indeed, judo athletes from different weight category presented similar relative PP and MP, likely due to the judo training demands as well as consequence of a selection of athletes with the higher potential to develop upper-body anaerobic fitness. Finally, the normative classificatory table created may be useful as a reference in judo athletes’ anaerobic evaluation. Korean Society of Exercise Rehabilitation 2019-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6416509/ /pubmed/30899737 http://dx.doi.org/10.12965/jer.1836520.260 Text en Copyright © 2019 Korean Society of Exercise Rehabilitation This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Franchini, Emerson
Upper-body Wingate test classificatory table for adult judo athletes
title Upper-body Wingate test classificatory table for adult judo athletes
title_full Upper-body Wingate test classificatory table for adult judo athletes
title_fullStr Upper-body Wingate test classificatory table for adult judo athletes
title_full_unstemmed Upper-body Wingate test classificatory table for adult judo athletes
title_short Upper-body Wingate test classificatory table for adult judo athletes
title_sort upper-body wingate test classificatory table for adult judo athletes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6416509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30899737
http://dx.doi.org/10.12965/jer.1836520.260
work_keys_str_mv AT franchiniemerson upperbodywingatetestclassificatorytableforadultjudoathletes