Cargando…
Laboratory Intercomparison of Cytogenetic Dosimetry Among 38 Laboratories in China
A nationwide intercomparison exercise for estimating the irradiated dose was organized by the National Institute for Radiological Protection, Center for Disease Control and Prevention of China. Thirty-eight laboratories participated in this program. The main objective of this intercomparison exercis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6416682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30890901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325819833473 |
_version_ | 1783403407642460160 |
---|---|
author | Pan, Yan Ruan, Jianlei Gao, Gang Wu, Lina Piao, Chunnan Liu, Jianxiang |
author_facet | Pan, Yan Ruan, Jianlei Gao, Gang Wu, Lina Piao, Chunnan Liu, Jianxiang |
author_sort | Pan, Yan |
collection | PubMed |
description | A nationwide intercomparison exercise for estimating the irradiated dose was organized by the National Institute for Radiological Protection, Center for Disease Control and Prevention of China. Thirty-eight laboratories participated in this program. The main objective of this intercomparison exercise was to compare the participants’ ability of operation and dose assessment basing on the frequencies of dicentrics and centric rings. Whole blood samples were irradiated with different dosages of (60)Co γ-rays. Each laboratory collected 2 blind samples and prepared the slides independently. All participants presented the estimated dose reports within 30 days. The doses assessed by the participants were acceptable within the reference dose of ±20%. The mean absolute difference of estimated dose relative to the reference dose was calculated, which reflected the overall accuracy of dose estimates for each laboratory. The overall estimation results of blind blood samples for intercomparison showed a good agreement with the reference dose for each sample, with nearly 75% of the participants producing acceptable results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6416682 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64166822019-03-19 Laboratory Intercomparison of Cytogenetic Dosimetry Among 38 Laboratories in China Pan, Yan Ruan, Jianlei Gao, Gang Wu, Lina Piao, Chunnan Liu, Jianxiang Dose Response Original Article A nationwide intercomparison exercise for estimating the irradiated dose was organized by the National Institute for Radiological Protection, Center for Disease Control and Prevention of China. Thirty-eight laboratories participated in this program. The main objective of this intercomparison exercise was to compare the participants’ ability of operation and dose assessment basing on the frequencies of dicentrics and centric rings. Whole blood samples were irradiated with different dosages of (60)Co γ-rays. Each laboratory collected 2 blind samples and prepared the slides independently. All participants presented the estimated dose reports within 30 days. The doses assessed by the participants were acceptable within the reference dose of ±20%. The mean absolute difference of estimated dose relative to the reference dose was calculated, which reflected the overall accuracy of dose estimates for each laboratory. The overall estimation results of blind blood samples for intercomparison showed a good agreement with the reference dose for each sample, with nearly 75% of the participants producing acceptable results. SAGE Publications 2019-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6416682/ /pubmed/30890901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325819833473 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Pan, Yan Ruan, Jianlei Gao, Gang Wu, Lina Piao, Chunnan Liu, Jianxiang Laboratory Intercomparison of Cytogenetic Dosimetry Among 38 Laboratories in China |
title | Laboratory Intercomparison of Cytogenetic Dosimetry Among 38
Laboratories in China |
title_full | Laboratory Intercomparison of Cytogenetic Dosimetry Among 38
Laboratories in China |
title_fullStr | Laboratory Intercomparison of Cytogenetic Dosimetry Among 38
Laboratories in China |
title_full_unstemmed | Laboratory Intercomparison of Cytogenetic Dosimetry Among 38
Laboratories in China |
title_short | Laboratory Intercomparison of Cytogenetic Dosimetry Among 38
Laboratories in China |
title_sort | laboratory intercomparison of cytogenetic dosimetry among 38
laboratories in china |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6416682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30890901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325819833473 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT panyan laboratoryintercomparisonofcytogeneticdosimetryamong38laboratoriesinchina AT ruanjianlei laboratoryintercomparisonofcytogeneticdosimetryamong38laboratoriesinchina AT gaogang laboratoryintercomparisonofcytogeneticdosimetryamong38laboratoriesinchina AT wulina laboratoryintercomparisonofcytogeneticdosimetryamong38laboratoriesinchina AT piaochunnan laboratoryintercomparisonofcytogeneticdosimetryamong38laboratoriesinchina AT liujianxiang laboratoryintercomparisonofcytogeneticdosimetryamong38laboratoriesinchina |