Cargando…

Laboratory Intercomparison of Cytogenetic Dosimetry Among 38 Laboratories in China

A nationwide intercomparison exercise for estimating the irradiated dose was organized by the National Institute for Radiological Protection, Center for Disease Control and Prevention of China. Thirty-eight laboratories participated in this program. The main objective of this intercomparison exercis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pan, Yan, Ruan, Jianlei, Gao, Gang, Wu, Lina, Piao, Chunnan, Liu, Jianxiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6416682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30890901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325819833473
_version_ 1783403407642460160
author Pan, Yan
Ruan, Jianlei
Gao, Gang
Wu, Lina
Piao, Chunnan
Liu, Jianxiang
author_facet Pan, Yan
Ruan, Jianlei
Gao, Gang
Wu, Lina
Piao, Chunnan
Liu, Jianxiang
author_sort Pan, Yan
collection PubMed
description A nationwide intercomparison exercise for estimating the irradiated dose was organized by the National Institute for Radiological Protection, Center for Disease Control and Prevention of China. Thirty-eight laboratories participated in this program. The main objective of this intercomparison exercise was to compare the participants’ ability of operation and dose assessment basing on the frequencies of dicentrics and centric rings. Whole blood samples were irradiated with different dosages of (60)Co γ-rays. Each laboratory collected 2 blind samples and prepared the slides independently. All participants presented the estimated dose reports within 30 days. The doses assessed by the participants were acceptable within the reference dose of ±20%. The mean absolute difference of estimated dose relative to the reference dose was calculated, which reflected the overall accuracy of dose estimates for each laboratory. The overall estimation results of blind blood samples for intercomparison showed a good agreement with the reference dose for each sample, with nearly 75% of the participants producing acceptable results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6416682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64166822019-03-19 Laboratory Intercomparison of Cytogenetic Dosimetry Among 38 Laboratories in China Pan, Yan Ruan, Jianlei Gao, Gang Wu, Lina Piao, Chunnan Liu, Jianxiang Dose Response Original Article A nationwide intercomparison exercise for estimating the irradiated dose was organized by the National Institute for Radiological Protection, Center for Disease Control and Prevention of China. Thirty-eight laboratories participated in this program. The main objective of this intercomparison exercise was to compare the participants’ ability of operation and dose assessment basing on the frequencies of dicentrics and centric rings. Whole blood samples were irradiated with different dosages of (60)Co γ-rays. Each laboratory collected 2 blind samples and prepared the slides independently. All participants presented the estimated dose reports within 30 days. The doses assessed by the participants were acceptable within the reference dose of ±20%. The mean absolute difference of estimated dose relative to the reference dose was calculated, which reflected the overall accuracy of dose estimates for each laboratory. The overall estimation results of blind blood samples for intercomparison showed a good agreement with the reference dose for each sample, with nearly 75% of the participants producing acceptable results. SAGE Publications 2019-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6416682/ /pubmed/30890901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325819833473 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Pan, Yan
Ruan, Jianlei
Gao, Gang
Wu, Lina
Piao, Chunnan
Liu, Jianxiang
Laboratory Intercomparison of Cytogenetic Dosimetry Among 38 Laboratories in China
title Laboratory Intercomparison of Cytogenetic Dosimetry Among 38 Laboratories in China
title_full Laboratory Intercomparison of Cytogenetic Dosimetry Among 38 Laboratories in China
title_fullStr Laboratory Intercomparison of Cytogenetic Dosimetry Among 38 Laboratories in China
title_full_unstemmed Laboratory Intercomparison of Cytogenetic Dosimetry Among 38 Laboratories in China
title_short Laboratory Intercomparison of Cytogenetic Dosimetry Among 38 Laboratories in China
title_sort laboratory intercomparison of cytogenetic dosimetry among 38 laboratories in china
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6416682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30890901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325819833473
work_keys_str_mv AT panyan laboratoryintercomparisonofcytogeneticdosimetryamong38laboratoriesinchina
AT ruanjianlei laboratoryintercomparisonofcytogeneticdosimetryamong38laboratoriesinchina
AT gaogang laboratoryintercomparisonofcytogeneticdosimetryamong38laboratoriesinchina
AT wulina laboratoryintercomparisonofcytogeneticdosimetryamong38laboratoriesinchina
AT piaochunnan laboratoryintercomparisonofcytogeneticdosimetryamong38laboratoriesinchina
AT liujianxiang laboratoryintercomparisonofcytogeneticdosimetryamong38laboratoriesinchina