Cargando…
A Systematic Review of the Effect of Neurofeedback in Cancer Patients
Introduction: Neurofeedback (NF) or electroencephalogram (EEG)-Biofeedback is a drug-free form of brain training to directly alter the underlying neural mechanisms of cognition and behavior. It is a technique that measures a subject’s EEG signal, processes it in real time, with the goal to enable a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6416750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30832518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1534735419832361 |
_version_ | 1783403421133438976 |
---|---|
author | Hetkamp, Madeleine Bender, Jasmin Rheindorf, Nadine Kowalski, Axel Lindner, Marion Knispel, Sarah Beckmann, Mingo Tagay, Sefik Teufel, Martin |
author_facet | Hetkamp, Madeleine Bender, Jasmin Rheindorf, Nadine Kowalski, Axel Lindner, Marion Knispel, Sarah Beckmann, Mingo Tagay, Sefik Teufel, Martin |
author_sort | Hetkamp, Madeleine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Neurofeedback (NF) or electroencephalogram (EEG)-Biofeedback is a drug-free form of brain training to directly alter the underlying neural mechanisms of cognition and behavior. It is a technique that measures a subject’s EEG signal, processes it in real time, with the goal to enable a behavioral modification by modulating brain activity. The most common application of the NF technology is in epilepsies, migraine, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, affective disorders, and psychotic disorders. Few studies have investigated the use of NF in context of psychosomatic illnesses. Little is known about the use in cancer patients or postcancer survivors despite the high number of this patient group. Objectives: We here provide a systematic review of the use and effect of NF on symptoms and burden in cancer patients and long-term cancer survivors. Methods: In conducting this systematic review, we followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Statement. Results: Our search resulted in only 3 experimental studies, 1 observational study, and 2 case reports. Given the heterogeneity of the intervention systems and protocols, no meta-analysis was conducted. Conclusion: Altogether, there is initial evidence that NF is a complementary, drug-free, and noninvasive therapy that has the potential to ameliorate symptoms in this patient group, such as pain, fatigue, depression, and sleep. Further studies are highly needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6416750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64167502019-03-19 A Systematic Review of the Effect of Neurofeedback in Cancer Patients Hetkamp, Madeleine Bender, Jasmin Rheindorf, Nadine Kowalski, Axel Lindner, Marion Knispel, Sarah Beckmann, Mingo Tagay, Sefik Teufel, Martin Integr Cancer Ther Review Article Introduction: Neurofeedback (NF) or electroencephalogram (EEG)-Biofeedback is a drug-free form of brain training to directly alter the underlying neural mechanisms of cognition and behavior. It is a technique that measures a subject’s EEG signal, processes it in real time, with the goal to enable a behavioral modification by modulating brain activity. The most common application of the NF technology is in epilepsies, migraine, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, affective disorders, and psychotic disorders. Few studies have investigated the use of NF in context of psychosomatic illnesses. Little is known about the use in cancer patients or postcancer survivors despite the high number of this patient group. Objectives: We here provide a systematic review of the use and effect of NF on symptoms and burden in cancer patients and long-term cancer survivors. Methods: In conducting this systematic review, we followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Statement. Results: Our search resulted in only 3 experimental studies, 1 observational study, and 2 case reports. Given the heterogeneity of the intervention systems and protocols, no meta-analysis was conducted. Conclusion: Altogether, there is initial evidence that NF is a complementary, drug-free, and noninvasive therapy that has the potential to ameliorate symptoms in this patient group, such as pain, fatigue, depression, and sleep. Further studies are highly needed. SAGE Publications 2019-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6416750/ /pubmed/30832518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1534735419832361 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Hetkamp, Madeleine Bender, Jasmin Rheindorf, Nadine Kowalski, Axel Lindner, Marion Knispel, Sarah Beckmann, Mingo Tagay, Sefik Teufel, Martin A Systematic Review of the Effect of Neurofeedback in Cancer Patients |
title | A Systematic Review of the Effect of Neurofeedback in Cancer Patients |
title_full | A Systematic Review of the Effect of Neurofeedback in Cancer Patients |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review of the Effect of Neurofeedback in Cancer Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review of the Effect of Neurofeedback in Cancer Patients |
title_short | A Systematic Review of the Effect of Neurofeedback in Cancer Patients |
title_sort | systematic review of the effect of neurofeedback in cancer patients |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6416750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30832518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1534735419832361 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hetkampmadeleine asystematicreviewoftheeffectofneurofeedbackincancerpatients AT benderjasmin asystematicreviewoftheeffectofneurofeedbackincancerpatients AT rheindorfnadine asystematicreviewoftheeffectofneurofeedbackincancerpatients AT kowalskiaxel asystematicreviewoftheeffectofneurofeedbackincancerpatients AT lindnermarion asystematicreviewoftheeffectofneurofeedbackincancerpatients AT knispelsarah asystematicreviewoftheeffectofneurofeedbackincancerpatients AT beckmannmingo asystematicreviewoftheeffectofneurofeedbackincancerpatients AT tagaysefik asystematicreviewoftheeffectofneurofeedbackincancerpatients AT teufelmartin asystematicreviewoftheeffectofneurofeedbackincancerpatients AT hetkampmadeleine systematicreviewoftheeffectofneurofeedbackincancerpatients AT benderjasmin systematicreviewoftheeffectofneurofeedbackincancerpatients AT rheindorfnadine systematicreviewoftheeffectofneurofeedbackincancerpatients AT kowalskiaxel systematicreviewoftheeffectofneurofeedbackincancerpatients AT lindnermarion systematicreviewoftheeffectofneurofeedbackincancerpatients AT knispelsarah systematicreviewoftheeffectofneurofeedbackincancerpatients AT beckmannmingo systematicreviewoftheeffectofneurofeedbackincancerpatients AT tagaysefik systematicreviewoftheeffectofneurofeedbackincancerpatients AT teufelmartin systematicreviewoftheeffectofneurofeedbackincancerpatients |